s.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130408/bd0b192f/attachment.html>
ailman/listinfo/openehr-**
> technical_lists.openehr.org<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130408/84293f5b/attachment.html>
I am always somewhat surprised as well. Thanks by the way for your
clarifying notes, that is exactly how I would summarise the discussions.
- thomas
On 07/04/2013 22:08, Randolph Neall wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> I'm surprised that at this advanced stage of openEHR's maturity you'd
> still have to d
Hi Randy,
I take your point about there being two threads in this discussion but
I think they *are* closely related.
The nub of Tim's argument, if I understand it correctly, is that a
two-level model is appropriate but that a three-level model (i.e
openEHR specialisations and templates) , allowin
4 matches
Mail list logo