Multi-level modelling - what does it mean?

On 09/04/2013 22:18, Tim Cook wrote: There are a large number of misconceptions and incorrect assumptions in this thread. I don't have time right now to address all of them but I will later this week. Quickly though, there are no tricks to what we do in MLHIM. Everything is 100% W3C

Multi-level modelling - what does it mean?

-names in your schema's and validate against relaxNG What do you think? Bert -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130410/aed0355d/attachment.html

Multi-level modelling - what does it mean?

On 04/10/2013 02:33 PM, Thomas Beale wrote: Redefinition of a component after it has been used to generate instance data is a BAD THING. This is an open door, a definition can never be changed again and having the same name. Bert

Multi-level modelling - what does it mean?

: http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130410/4e0fc5ee/attachment.html

Multi-level modelling - what does it mean?

part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130410/7637bc1c/attachment.html

Multi-level modelling - what does it mean?

-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130410/fd697c75/attachment.html

Multi-level modelling - what does it mean?

to that. I adapt with codeine. Due to the pain of thinking about it ;-) - thomas -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130410/5f1e3211/attachment.html