I agree it is a balancing act in how far the semantics should be in the
RM or in the archetypes.
Both ways have their pro and contra.
Thanks for explaining it
Bert
On 28-08-15 19:17, Thomas Beale wrote:
Hi Bert,
On 28/08/2015 16:32, Bert Verhees wrote:
On 27-08-15 19:54, Thomas Beale wrote:
Hi Bert,
On 28/08/2015 16:32, Bert Verhees wrote:
On 27-08-15 19:54, Thomas Beale wrote:
I would suggest that CIMI has been simiplified to the point of not
being directly usable as an RM by openEHR or 13606 - most of the
needed context information is gone in CIMI, and it doesn't
distinguish a
Hi Silje,
I would not expect any problems.
- thomas
On 28/08/2015 23:05, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote:
Hi everyone,
We’ve bumped into an issue related to versioning of archetypes and
implementing non-published versions:
Several implementation projects are using archetypes from the
http:/
I can't see any problem to the approach you propose.
2015-08-28 15:05 GMT+02:00 Bakke, Silje Ljosland <
silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no>:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> We’ve bumped into an issue related to versioning of archetypes and
> implementing non-published versions:
>
>
>
> Several implementa
Hi everyone,
We've bumped into an issue related to versioning of archetypes and implementing
non-published versions:
Several implementation projects are using archetypes from the
http://arketyper.no CKM, many of which are still drafts or under review since
the CKM switch to v0 for unpublished
If no one else is volunteering, I can do it over a month or so. I am
really quite busy and under time-pressure at this moment
Bert
On 28-08-15 13:00, Ian McNicoll wrote:
Edwin has been around here for a while.
I think the suggestion of creating a wiki page based on this
discussion (and updat
Edwin has been around here for a while.
I think the suggestion of creating a wiki page based on this discussion
(and updating Erik's StackOverflow page) is worthwhile. It is question that
is commonly asked and a single summary would be helpful.
Any volunteers?
Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)
7 matches
Mail list logo