Actually - I did this concrete e-mail and addition to get some feedback on my
previous e-mail :)
And as you say Thomas: The most important thing now is to have some input on
the concept or semantics of this new term.
Currently we are prototyping on this functionality to see how it would work
re
Re: process, yes, it needs to be managed separately. Ian is the
terminology component owner. But I assumed Bjørn was talking about the
semantics of the new term - 'Report'. Bjørn - can you elaborate on what
Compositions would merit the 'report' Composition category?
- thomas
On 04/03/2016
Hi Bjorn,
How did you come up with the concept id of 434? We need to be careful about
assigning our own concept ids, we really need openEHR to assign these, I
suggest through the SEC process initiated by a Jira card.
At present we have two terminology files, as you know we have agreed to use the
I just added a «composition category» on my fork of the terminology project.
https://github.com/bjornna/terminology/commit/600dec3058cd85f9db3e5859d6bffa7f01a45edf
+
Any comments?
Ven
4 matches
Mail list logo
