Dear Ed,
I got the that feeling TOO, and I wish we can get some type of working 
FRAMEWORK that allow TWO AMAZING approaches to get some kind of 
interoperability to JOIN forces together. I gather, at the operational 
level, that is it is EXTREMELLY difficult to separate the GOOD FOR society 
and business iniciatives that somehow REWARDS materially all the great 
innovation created.

I am personally live everyday the prevention of great PROJECTS of EHR in 
developing countries due to the lack of understanding of the balance 
between, resources and people- needs---------------

Hope is what I reckon will allow us as human being to DO THE RIGHT THINGS 
every day.

Cheers Carol

Melbourne Australia

--------------------------------------------------
From: "William E Hammond" <hammo...@mc.duke.edu>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 5:28 AM
To: "For openEHR technical discussions" <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
Cc: "For openEHR technical discussions" <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
Subject: Re: Please respond by Nov. 5th:Known   Free/Open       Source  
EHR/EMRDeploymentCount.

> Thanks.  I agree that things are moving ahead.  I wish we could remove 
> some
> of the animosity (maybe I am reading it worng) towards HL7 (not from you),
> and close the gap between the two efforts.
>
> best Regards.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>             Thomas Beale
>             <thomas.beale at oce
>             aninformatics.com                                          To
>             >                         For openEHR technical discussions
>             Sent by:                  <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
>             openehr-technical                                          cc
>             -bounces at openehr.
>             org                                                   Subject
>                                       Re: Please respond by Nov. 5th:
>                                       Known  Free/Open   Source
>             11/06/2008 01:11          EHR/EMR      Deployment Count.
>             PM
>
>
>             Please respond to
>                For openEHR
>                 technical
>                discussions
>             <openehr-technica
>              l at openehr.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> William E Hammond wrote:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> I am very impressed with these statistics.  I was not aware of the
>> penetration of openEHR into that volume of use.  Congratulations for a
> hugh
>> success.  Can you help me identify the actual systems that are in use in
>> Australia, Netherlands and Brazil.  I am specifically interested in the
> EHR
>> systems that use openEHR. We need to build on those successes.
>>
>> Thanks for sharing this information.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Ed Hammond
>>
> *Ed,
>
> I should stress that these are pure openEHR systems; systems based on
> archetypes of some kind include Systematic (SSE) in Aarhus, Denmark, and
> Obstet in Australia. Both companies have expressed serious interest in
> 'going official', and I happen to know that their architectures are
> sufficiently close to the archetype / template idea that it is feasible.
> I dont have any numbers on EHRs in these systems but I would expect in
> the hundreds of thousands, based on the catchment areas they serve.
> Although I said at the beginning that I don't think it is that useful a
> statistic, it's not a bad brut measure of uptake, so let's see if we can
> gather some better numbers, for interest's sake.
>
> One reason for success of at least our own EHR server (Ocean
> Informatics) is that its performance is good - sub-0.5 second for
> everything so far, with a typical concurrent load equivalent to about a
> 1,000 bed hospital.  I don't yet have performance numbers for harder
> population queries, but mundane population queries across 10,000 -
> 250,000 EHRs are fast.
>
> This isn't the place to advertise, but I think it is reasonable to at
> least allow the community to know that real performance is indeed
> possible and feasible to implement in openEHR. If others agree, it may
> be the time to do a bit of a poll and start putting harder data on the
> 'who is using it' webpage.
>
> - thomas
>
> *
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
> 

Reply via email to