HL7 opens up

2012-09-05 Thread Dr Lavanian
Dear All, I have been asking for more than 2 years for HL7 to become simplified and free- to-use, so that it could proliferate globally. So this is good news.however I still await details. Like - (1) what is free, (2) how long is it free, (3) what does 'free' really mean, (4) how soon will

openEHR Transition: Web-based tools?

2011-09-11 Thread Dr Lavanian
Hi all, Both approaches have their pros and cons. I would suggest a hybrid approach. Have a desktop app with a local Db that updates itself from a web based repository, as per need. This way you could have the security and speed of a desktop app with the 'updatability' of a web model. With

HL7 modelling approach

2010-11-26 Thread Dr Lavanian
Dear William, I found your note of great interest. IMHO V3 definitely has a higher learning and implementation curve as compared to V2.x and I look forward to ideas that would simplify message creation in V3. I Would be interested in downloading details of DCM (detailed clinical models) to XML

More on ISO 21090 complexity

2010-11-20 Thread Dr Lavanian
Dear friends, My thoughts on this debate wrt complexity of HL7 and similar such standards as also the slow pace of adoption: I think it is time we went back to basics (especially when a simple thing like describing Blood pressure (110/70 mmHg) can take more than a Kb of memory) The reason being

Why is OpenEHR adoption so slow?

2010-11-02 Thread Dr Lavanian
Dear All, I think Pablo has a very pertinent point. Theory and armchair discussions are good, but applicability in real life situations, and painlessly, is the need of the hour. If I were an implementor I would need a (no nonsense) 'openEHR for dummies', an SDK, sample code, a ready