blood film observation archetype

We've been running throuh the "normal" and possible ranges of values for lab tests and found that the archetype I mention in the subject does not state but a "bigger than 0" restriction for Haemoglobin, RCC, etc. I decided to take a look because ranges provided to me indicated diferent "possibl

Archetype Modification

data) -- This algorithm must be added to working code and system must be redeployed? thanks again Rong Chen wrote: >Rodrigo Filgueira wrote: > > >>Let's say I have an archetype being

Archetype Modification

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Normal and other ranges

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Normal and other ranges

>Vince > >Dr Vincent McCauley > >----- Original Message - >From: "Rodrigo Filgueira" >To: ; >Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 6:19 AM >Subject: Normal and other ranges > > > > >>I see DV_ORDERED can optionally have specified norma

Normal and other ranges

I see DV_ORDERED can optionally have specified normal and other ranges. While the other ranges are said to be dependant on the measuring context. normal range it seems to me, coud be defined as allways the same? I'm thinking about laboratory resullts. Anyway, is there a way to define this ranges i

More doubts about assertions

understand. am I correct? Thomas Beale wrote: >Rodrigo Filgueira wrote: > > >>Specs and documentation state that assertions should be used in >>reference to information *inside *the archetype they are defined in. >>does this mean I cannot create an assertion in comp

More doubts about assertions

situation came up while I was thinking on how to model the following, "perinatology reports should not be recorded for male patients". How would you represent this restriction with RM and archetypes? thank you   Rodrigo Filgueira Asistente Docente/Investigador Núcleo de Ingeniería Biomé

[RESEND] C_PRIMITIVE and C_DOMAIN_TYPE

model, and how it is used. If you could tell us how you use it, I believe it would be very helpful. thank you Rodrigo Filgueira Asistente Docente/Investigador N?cleo de Ingenier?a Biom?dica, FING - UDELAR

C_PRIMITIVE and C_DOMAIN_TYPE

us how you use it, I believe it would be very helpful. thank you Rodrigo Filgueira Asistente Docente/Investigador N?cleo de Ingenier?a Biom?dica, FING - UDELAR

C_PRIMITIVE and C_DOMAIN_TYPE

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

AUDIT_DETAILS

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

AUDIT_DETAILS

I'm trying to understand where audit details are used and how. My first thought was that it had to be an attribute of contribution which is correct, but then I found it is also an attribute of the VERSION class. Then I thought, ok this is better, let's audit each version and we are done. The fi

More questions!!!

In relation to this question and answer, could you provide an example? Is it path_to_class instead of path_to_object? >> Another question about this, how do you refer to this attributes in >> templates? > > Paths - path_to_object/attribute_name thank you

More questions!!!

In relation to this question and answer, could you provide an example? Is it path_to_class instead of path_to_object? >> Another question about this, how do you refer to this attributes in >> templates? > > Paths - path_to_object/attribute_name thank you

On alerts and medication interaction

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On alerts and medication interaction

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

More questions!!!

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

what is the use of the reference model?

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

More questions!!!

does not inherit from LOCATABLE. Is that correct? thank you Quoting Thomas Beale : > Rodrigo Filgueira wrote: >> I've been going round in circles about this question all weekend, >> and have two ideas. >> >> 1. It's basic and most important use is to

what is the use of the reference model?

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

what is the use of the reference model?

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Another moddeling question - changing compositions.

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Another moddeling question - changing compositions.

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Medication Administration Control - again

Sorry I'm starting another thread but some of my posts don?t make it to the list, maybe it's because of the Re:. Don't know, hope this one makes it. I did get the idea of registering the causes that lead to the suspencsion or cancelation of a medication in the wf_details of the instruction_deta

Modelling Medication Administration Control (2)

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

[Fwd: Modelling Medication Administration Control]

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

[Fwd: Modelling Medication Administration Control]

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -- next part -- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: rfil...@fing.edu.uy Subject: Modelling Medication A

Problem Saving an Archetype with 0.99.1a Beta

I meant a LIST structure. I downloaded 99.2a and it worked fine. thanks Sam Heard wrote: > Rodrigo > > Do you mean a LIST based OBSERVATION/EVALUATION or a LIST structure > (these choices are made on the start up screen). > > I cannot reproduce the problem in 99.2a, so you might try the current

Arquetyping patient ID

I have found in the demographic arquetypes released so far that person arquetype includes a "patient name" arquetype for matters of "PARTY _IDENTITY". I find name to come a little short when talking about Identities, so decided to put extra items in the PARTY_IDENTITY details (LIST) field. For

Problem Saving an Archetype with 0.99.1a Beta

while trying to save an List based archetype with just one item in it I get: Serialisation failed; archetype not valid: List{C_COMPLEX_OBJECT} [at]: cannot have both 'any_allowed' and have children. any clues on what may be wrong? thanks - If you have any questions about using this list, ple

Arquetyping patient ID

I have found in the demographic arquetypes released so far that person arquetype includes a "patient name" arquetype for matters of "PARTY _IDENTITY". I find name to come a little short when talking about Identities, so decided to put extra items in the PARTY_IDENTITY details (LIST) field. For

Arquetyping patient ID

I have found in the demographic arquetypes released so far that person arquetype includes a "patient name" arquetype for matters of "PARTY _IDENTITY". I find name to come a little short when talking about Identities, so decided to put extra items in the PARTY_IDENTITY details (LIST) field. For

Arquetyping patient ID

I have found in the demographic arquetypes released so far that person arquetype includes a "patient name" arquetype for matters of "PARTY _IDENTITY". I find name to come a little short when talking about Identities, so decided to put extra items in the PARTY_IDENTITY details (LIST) field. For

Validating data input

k you Rodrigo Filgueira Research Assistant N?cleo de Ingenier?a Biom?dica, FING - UDELAR -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20050218/76a390d0/attachment.html>