ADL/AOM 1.5 - id-codes unification - the final change

Hi Thomas, best wishes to you too, and all other readers. ADL is a generic modeling language, one should not stick to the OpenEHR RM while defining it. it looks like a good idea to reflect the structure of an archetype in the idCodes, like this: definition[at] list[at.1]

ADL/AOM 1.5 - id-codes unification - the final change

Made a comment on the wiki page, but I will copy that here too: Still thinking about this, but I have a first doubt: What is the result of generating the standard equivalent ADL for this ADL code? (from the example) ELEMENT[id31] occurrences matches {0..1} matches {

ADL/AOM 1.5 - id-codes unification - the final change

Thanks for the input; see the wiki page for response. On 02/01/2014 09:41, Diego Bosc? wrote: > Made a comment on the wiki page, but I will copy that here too: > > Still thinking about this, but I have a first doubt: > > What i

ADL/AOM 1.5 - id-codes unification - the final change

happy new year and best wishes for 2014. I hope your new year's day is a bright one (unless you live in the UK, in which case it's a lost cause today ;-) I have been working in the last few months to produce a final version of ADL/AOM 1.5, based on: * existing requirements