Damon
This is important to consider
I believe that DSS
groups will be a major player in determining the final archetypes that are
agreed at a high level.
It seems to me that in the same way, archetypes will have great impact on
the development of future EHR-compatible instrument interface
Karsten,
The advantage is that there will be no 3 or 4 competing standards, but
just one.
It seems enough.
Gerard
--
--
Gerard Freriks, MD
Convenor CEN/TC251 WG1
TNO-PG
Zernikedreef 9
2333CK Leiden
The Netherlands
+31 71 5181388
+31 654 792800
On 29 Nov 2004, at 23:44, Karsten Hilbert
Hi,
We, at CEN are devoted to CEN/IEEE/ISO developments and not 'old rusty'
standards.
Gerard
--
--
Gerard Freriks, MD
Convenor CEN/TC251 WG1
TNO-PG
Zernikedreef 9
2333CK Leiden
The Netherlands
+31 71 5181388
+31 654 792800
On 29 Nov 2004, at 20:56, Damon Berry wrote:
Sam,
Thanks for
We, at CEN are devoted to CEN/IEEE/ISO developments and not 'old rusty'
standards.
The advantage of which is what, exactly ?
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a
Dear all,
I am not sure whether this is premature but I curious as to which part of an
OpenEHR compliant EHR-S will enforce the constraints that are embedded in an
archetype model - I note the use of the term data validator on the web
site - Will the kernel in an OpenEHR server parse data (for
5 matches
Mail list logo