Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights?

2014-11-13 Thread Grahame Grieve
my advice from LOINC/regenstrief is that it does apply Grahame On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com wrote: Something that has become clear in CIMI, and will affect openEHR, 13606 and most likely any archetype developer is that acknowledgements

Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights?

2014-11-13 Thread Heather Leslie
-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Grahame Grieve Sent: Thursday, 13 November 2014 8:07 PM To: For openEHR clinical discussions Cc: Openehr-Technical Subject: Re: Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights? my advice from LOINC/regenstrief is that it does apply Grahame

Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights?

2014-11-13 Thread Ian McNicoll
: Openehr-Technical Subject: Re: Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights? my advice from LOINC/regenstrief is that it does apply Grahame On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com wrote: Something that has become clear

Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights?

2014-11-13 Thread Ian McNicoll
So we all would probably benefit from creating some copy and paste examples for common 3rd party attribution that can be easily incorporated into archetypes / resources. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll office +44 (0)1536 414 994 fax +44 (0)1536 516317 mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 skype ianmcnicoll ian.mcnicoll

Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights?

2014-11-13 Thread Thomas Beale
Hi David, licence is taken care of in the model as it is today http://www.openehr.org/wiki/download/attachments/45645905/AOM_archetype_package.png?version=2modificationDate=1412032298000api=v2. Note that it is currently spelt in international English, not US English ('license', which is only

Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights?

2014-11-13 Thread Ian McNicoll
Hi Diego, I am not quite sure what you meant by that? Ian On 13 November 2014 09:56, Diego Bosc? yampeku at gmail.com wrote: If that's the case then we cannot assume any other attribute to be in the repository. 2014-11-13 10:52 GMT+01:00 Ian McNicoll ian at mcmi.co.uk: Hi Diego, I did

Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights?

2014-11-13 Thread Thomas Beale
On 13/11/2014 10:02, Heather Leslie wrote: I've had discussions with IHTSDO about needing a formal statement about SCT that should be placed in archetypes and this will be identical to that which they are currently working on with CIMI. Regards Heather The main thing we need to do with

Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights?

2014-11-13 Thread Diego Boscá
Maybe in the case of terminologies it could be put in a kind of terminology metadata part that we discussed some time ago to correctly identify the different terminology versions. 2014-11-13 11:33 GMT+01:00 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com: On 13/11/2014 10:02, Heather Leslie