-Original Message-
From: Eric Browne [mailto:eric at montagesystems.com.au]
Sent: Saturday, 7 December 2002 2:25 PM
To: Thomas Beale
Cc: Sam Heard; openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: Categorising EHR Content
Tom Sam,
Thanks for taking the time to explain the openEHR use
Eric Browne wrote:
Tom Sam,
To start with your statement, Tom, regarding the usefulness of recording
the Bali-bombing in a subject's EHR:
yep. And consider: while it would in theory be possible to put something
in the EHR indicating the fact of the Bali bombing, this is in fact of
no use to
at montagesystems.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2002 10:31 AM
To: aniket Joshi
Cc: sam.heard at bigpond.com; openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: Categorising EHR Content
Aniket,
I have refreshed myself on openEHR's clinical model
terminology, but I still think you miss my point
current view.
Categorising EHR Content
[ in the following discussion, the word subject is
used. This refers
to the person who is the subject of a particular
EHR. Information
contained in the EHR pertains to that subject
Sam et al,
Sometimes it is beneficial to stand back and review the purpose
of EHRs, when trying to categorise content. No doubt you have done
this far more often than me, but for yet another high level perspective
here is my current view.
Categorising EHR Content
5 matches
Mail list logo
