Concept Overload Caution

f Of Stef Verlinden > Sent: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 4:02 PM > To: For openEHR technical discussions > Subject: Re: Concept Overload Caution > > Hi Heath, > > I complety agree with you. Let's all do what we're best at. What I > would like to add to your proposal is

CKM reviews (Was Re: Concept Overload Caution)

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Concept Overload Caution

Heath Frankel wrote: > Hi Tim, > Thank you for your post, I complete agree. Like you I am not a clinician > and feel that I am rocking the establishment of openEHR and the principles > of Archetypes by saying this, but I strongly believe that we need to have a > technical review process of archety

Concept Overload Caution

ounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cook > Sent: Wednesday, 3 June 2009 9:59 AM > To: For openEHR technical discussions > Subject: Concept Overload Caution > > Hi All, > > The past 3 or 4 subjects on this list takes me back to conversations > that we had before (maybe

Concept Overload Caution

Hi Tim et al, Interesting comments. Certainly it is very common for newcomers to openEHR to model end-point datasets e.g. 'Diabetes consultation' as a single archetype, rather than as a set of archetypes , aggregated into a template. Sometimes this is due to a misunderstanding of the openEHR princ

Concept Overload Caution

Hi Heath and Peter Peter Gummer wrote: > Heath Frankel wrote: > >> I strongly believe that we need to have a >> technical review process of archetypes before they are published. ... >> >> Please understand that I not trying to re-empower the technician, I am >> simply looking for good quality

Concept Overload Caution

l-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr- >> technical- >> bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cook >> Sent: Wednesday, 3 June 2009 9:59 AM >> To: For openEHR technical discussions >> Subject: Concept Overload Caution >> >> Hi All, >> >>

Concept Overload Caution

Hi All, The past 3 or 4 subjects on this list takes me back to conversations that we had before (maybe several years ago?) when we were discussing slots and links. Maybe they were here maybe they were on the ARB list. I do not recall now. But my feeling in both of these areas are that there is