Re: ACTION performer?

Can I suggest that a PR is raised for this ? - thomas On 27/08/2015 21:40, Ian McNicoll wrote: Hi Silje, I agree that ACTION.performer would be a useful addition (optional) to the RM. For now, I model per

Re: ACTION performer?

On 27/08/2015 10:18, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote: So it’s possible to specify the role of each participant? yep - the PARTICIPATION type has 'function' i.e. 'role' (this name was adopted from 13606 a long time ago - probably too late to change). - thomas

Re: ACTION performer?

Hi Silje, I agree that ACTION.performer would be a useful addition (optional) to the RM. For now, I model performer as a participation. ACTION.other_participations inherits ENTRY.other_participations http://www.openehr.org/releases/trunk/UML/#Diagrams___18_1_83e026d_1433173757197_893618_10673 Th

RE: ACTION performer?

So it’s possible to specify the role of each participant? Regards, Silje From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 11:09 AM To: Openehr-Technical Subject: Re: ACTION performer

Re: ACTION performer?

Normally you would use participations. Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "Bakke, Silje Ljosland" To: "openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org" Subject: ACTION performer? Date: Thu, Aug 27, 2015 10:00 Hi all, According to Norwegian law, the performer or main performer of a procedur