Op 10 aug. 2011, om 03:44 heeft Joel A Fernandes het volgende geschreven:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup my own feeds. For this purpose, I have rsync'ed
the deploy/ipk directory from my OE core tmp directory to my
webserver, and I edited /etc/opkg/base-feed.conf on my board's root
filesystem
Nitin, any insights on this?
Op 2 aug. 2011, om 17:01 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
It does look a bit weird. That code was introduced in 561d8754,
ostensibly as a merger of the eglibc and glibc equivalents. But, the
original code from glibc-package.bbclass did:
def
On Aug 9, 2011, at 9:20 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
Trying to build something like u-boot w/the toolchain produced by
meta-toolchain-sdk and get the following:
$ powerpc-poky-linux-gnuspe-ld -g -Ttext 0x4 -o hello_world -e
hello_world hello_world.o libstubs.o -L.
Hi,
This has been sitting on my TODO for way too long now, so I'll just post the
errors here and hope someone else finds the time to fix them :)
WARNING: For recipe qt4-embedded, the following files were installed but not
shipped in any package:
WARNING:
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 23:20 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Trying to build something like u-boot w/the toolchain produced by
meta-toolchain-sdk and get the following:
$ powerpc-poky-linux-gnuspe-ld -g -Ttext 0x4 -o hello_world -e
hello_world hello_world.o libstubs.o -L. -lgcc
From: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
update-alternatives installed: one in /usr/sbin from chkconfig (symlinked to
alternatives), and the other in /usr/bin from update-alternatives-cworth. It
appears for whatever reason that the one from chkconfig is run during postinst
processing but if
On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 01:41:05 AM Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Andreas Mueller schnitzelt...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi
I am debugging thunar to find the reason for segfault and modified the
recipe to be compiled without optimization -O0. Now I need to step into
shared
Hello,
I was looking at the udev recipes and noticed that there is minor
difference between oe-core and meta-oe recipes. I went through logs but
could not find the reason. The difference is meta-oe recipe is creating
extra files
touch ${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/saved.uname
touch
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:11 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
Also, it does seem that bitbake -e -b ... really is broken. I get:
ERROR: Command execution failed: Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/pb/oe/bitbake/lib/bb/command.py, line 102, in runAsyncCommand
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 20:15 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
+-AC_PATH_PROG(INTLTOOL_PERL, perl)
++AC_PATH_PROG(INTLTOOL_PERL, nativeperl)
I don't think you want to do that for the copy of intltool.m4 that's
going to be installed on the target, only for the one that goes into the
sysroot.
p.
Hi guys,
When trying to fix bug #892(http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=892),
I met some problems in generating the default site config files used by
cross-canadian toolchain.
When using autoconf for cross-compile, it is impossible to check features that
require running a test
On Wednesday 10 August 2011 09:35:31 Koen Kooi wrote:
This has been sitting on my TODO for way too long now, so I'll just post
the errors here and hope someone else finds the time to fix them :)
...
These are on my todo list, hopefully I will have time to look at them when I
get back from the
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 02:06 +, James Limbouris wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 August 2011 9:55 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 8/9/11 7:32 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 08/08/2011 07:04 PM, James Limbouris wrote:
The pseudo executable sets the PSEUDO_LOCALSTATEDIR environment
variable to point to a
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 10:28 +0800, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote on 2011-08-06:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
---
meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc | 19 +--
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:18 +0800, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
Darren Hart wrote on 2011-08-09:
On 08/09/2011 07:04 AM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
Hi Darren, thanks a lot for all the suggestions! I appreciate your
efforts to help to make the patch better. Below is the updated patch
(also pasted at the end
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 11:05 -0700, Christopher Larson wrote:
This version addresses the issue brought up by Richard regarding unconditional
export of variables resulting in checksum changes. This exports the required
variables specifically within the subprocess for the terminal.
A future
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 22:52 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Don't use GLIBC_EXTRA_OECONF for the nativesdk builds. Easiest solution
is to just override it settings. Otherwise we might pickup configure
options ment for the target build.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 16:50 +0800, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
From: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
[YOCTO #1348]
The variable TARGET_OS has different value when building qt-x11-free-native
and \
qt-x11-free.
The different cause failure to compile qt3.
$ bitbake qt-x11-free-native -e |
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 12:56 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
From: Daniel Lazzari dlazz...@leapfrog.com
Lazily appending causes a bug where wrong cache is
cleared when BB_SRCREV_POLICY = clear.
Tested with qemuarm on uclibc/eglibc in same build dir
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lazzari Jr
Hi Jiajun,
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 14:11 +0800, Jiajun Xu wrote:
[YOCTO #883]
Some graphics 3D game(urbanterror, openarena) tests need libSDL.so.
Change libsdl-nativesdk to libsdl and add it into Sato image.
Signed-off-by: Jiajun Xu jiajun...@intel.com
---
...libsdl-nativesdk_1.2.11.bb =
On Aug 10, 2011, at 4:19 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 23:20 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Trying to build something like u-boot w/the toolchain produced by
meta-toolchain-sdk and get the following:
$ powerpc-poky-linux-gnuspe-ld -g -Ttext 0x4 -o hello_world -e
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 07:43 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
While these are good suggestions, I still think the toolchain is broken as
u-boot has been this way for sometime and numerous other cross toolchains
work perfectly fine.
I just tried ld -lgcc on my Ubuntu desktop and it didn't work there
On Aug 9, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
If we don't do this, the SDK target sysroot is named generically even
when it contains package architecture specific optimisations.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
---
diff --git
On Aug 9, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
Richard Purdie wrote on 2011-08-10:
If we don't do this, the SDK target sysroot is named generically even
when it contains package architecture specific optimisations.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org ---
diff
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:18 +0800, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
Darren Hart wrote on 2011-08-09:
On 08/09/2011 07:04 AM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
Hi Darren, thanks a lot for all the suggestions! I appreciate your
efforts to help to make the patch better. Below is the updated patch
(also pasted at the end
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 14:07 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 07:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 9, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
Richard Purdie wrote on 2011-08-10:
If we don't do this, the SDK target sysroot is named generically even
when it contains
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 07:34 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
On a related thought to these changes - how does this play if
you use multiple SDKs for different, but somewhat related, architectures?
I'd like to create a simple SDK (just toolchain mostly) using 'meta-toolchain'
for both armv5te and
On 2011-08-10 07:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 07:34 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
On a related thought to these changes - how does this play if
you use multiple SDKs for different, but somewhat related, architectures?
I'd like to create a simple SDK (just toolchain mostly) using
On Aug 10, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2011-08-10 07:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 07:34 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
On a related thought to these changes - how does this play if
you use multiple SDKs for different, but somewhat related, architectures?
I'd like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So the root of this seems to stem from the following in automake's
python.m4:
am_cv_python_pythondir=$PYTHON_PREFIX/lib/python$PYTHON_VERSION/site-packages
am_cv_python_pyexecdir=$PYTHON_EXEC_PREFIX/lib/python$PYTHON_VERSION/site-packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/2011 04:30 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 20:15 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
+-AC_PATH_PROG(INTLTOOL_PERL, perl) ++AC_PATH_PROG(INTLTOOL_PERL,
nativeperl)
I don't think you want to do that for the copy of intltool.m4 that's
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 07:59 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On 08/10/2011 04:30 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 20:15 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
+-AC_PATH_PROG(INTLTOOL_PERL, perl) ++AC_PATH_PROG(INTLTOOL_PERL,
nativeperl)
I don't think you want to do that for the copy of intltool.m4
Hi,
Kindly explain this difference to me. Thanks.
Regards,
Noor
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Ahsan, Noor
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 3:12 PM
To:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So the root of this seems to stem from the following in automake's
python.m4:
am_cv_python_pythondir=$PYTHON_PREFIX/lib/python$PYTHON_VERSION/site-packages
We need --with-cpu based to glibc to get proper support on 603e e500mc
to pickup proper math libs to deal with sqrt. These core do not
implement the fsqrt[s] instructions that the normal PPC math libs
utilize.
This causes use to not set AVAILTUNES specifically to the sub-arch only
as we arent
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:51 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So the root of this seems to stem from the following in automake's
python.m4:
the yocto wiki references mentions a bitbake-diffsigs
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Enable_sstate_cache
but not seeing that. How can one compare signature or try and figure out why a
cache item isn't being reused between cfgs.
- k
___
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
the yocto wiki references mentions a bitbake-diffsigs
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Enable_sstate_cache
but not seeing that. How can one compare signature or try and figure out why
a cache item isn't being
I feel like I have something not configured correctly. The setup is as follows:
base is ppc64 with 'lib64'.
# Uncomment the following lines to enable multilib builds
require conf/multilib.conf
MULTILIBS = multilib:lib
DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib = powerpc
And I get:
NOTE: Resolving any
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 12:51 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
the yocto wiki references mentions a bitbake-diffsigs
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Enable_sstate_cache
but not seeing that. How can one compare signature or try and figure out why
a cache item isn't being reused between cfgs.
Currently its hard to figure out if/when sstate is checking for possible
packages to speed up builds. This patch adds level 2 debug output which
better indicates what files are being searched for an why.
[YOCTO #1259]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
---
diff
I don't think the patch is correct. If these tune files are included, the
GLIBC_EXTRA_OECONF is set unconditionally. It is possible to include the tune
files, but not actually use the tunings. (There are cases where you might want
to inherit specific tunings, etc.)
Instead, I'd suggest you do:
Why?
- k
On Aug 10, 2011, at 2:19 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
I don't think the patch is correct. If these tune files are included, the
GLIBC_EXTRA_OECONF is set unconditionally. It is possible to include the tune
files, but not actually use the tunings. (There are cases where you might
want
On 8/10/11 3:06 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
Why?
- k
On Aug 10, 2011, at 2:19 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
I don't think the patch is correct. If these tune files are included, the
GLIBC_EXTRA_OECONF is set unconditionally. It is possible to include the
tune
files, but not actually use the
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 13:04 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
I feel like I have something not configured correctly. The setup is as
follows:
base is ppc64 with 'lib64'.
# Uncomment the following lines to enable multilib builds
require conf/multilib.conf
MULTILIBS = multilib:lib
On 07/28/2011 02:44 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Gst-plugins get 2 extra packages:
${PN}-apps: helper apps in ${bindir}
${PN}-meta: meta package that will drag in all plugins, libs and apps ${PN}
generates
And all libs are split out and run through debian style renaming if enabled.
The packaging
On 07/28/2011 12:20 AM, Mei Lei wrote:
Hi,
This patch will fix an compiler finding issue.
The CC variable, its value sometimes like x86_64-poky-linux-gcc -m64
--sysroot=/${TMPDIR}/sysroots/qemux86-64, contains option information. This will confuse python when
finding the compiler
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
Op 10 aug. 2011 om 17:54 heeft Joel A Fernandes agnel.j...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Joel A Fernandes agnel.j...@gmail.com
wrote:
Switch to the latest CE 2.26.02.11 [1]
On 08/08/2011 02:48 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
mount.h has few more defines that are being used by newer
applications such as systemd
Signed-off-by: Khem Rajraj.k...@gmail.com
---
.../uclibc/uclibc-0.9.32/mount.h-update.patch | 85
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Xu, Dongxiao
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:00 AM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH
This fixes all IRQ kernel panics that were showing up on my BeagleBoard-xM
* Refreshed patch that switched to using threaded IRQ
(0009-rtc-twl-Switch-to-using-threaded-irq.patch)
* Added patch to fix registration vs init order
(0010-fix-registration-vs-init-order.patch)
* Modified batter
This makes the errors possibly related to a corruption of the memory such as
Undefined Instruction
and Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address go away. I have
verified this multiple times
Signed-off-by: Joel A Fernandes agnel.j...@gmail.com
---
[YOCTO #1151]
Change the offset from the beginning of the disk to aligne the blocks.
In this script, we use mkfs.ext3 to create file system after partition, but we
use mkpartfs to create file system repeatly,
and get some warnings about choose another specific tools to create file system
for
The following changes since commit a1f87ec65fa1a6d5ce9a010548dbe7c01ab9b711:
Kumar Gala (1):
eglibc: force GLIBC_EXTRA_OECONF to not be uset for nativesdk
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib lmei3/bug1151
Worse, I don't think bitbake.conf is guaranteed to be in the same spot in
every layers.conf, so different layers will parse with different environments.
Sorry, that last line is wrong. Bitbake.conf always parses last.
James
___
Openembedded-core
55 matches
Mail list logo
