[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] gettext: use included libxml and libcroco

2011-09-03 Thread Saul Wold
[YOCTO #1400] By using the included libxml and libcroco, we do not create additional on this core library. There was an ordering issue that when one library was not built, but gettext detected the other library a compliation would fail, this will force it to always use the included libraries.

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] icu-3.6: fix building with big make -j

2011-09-03 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
icu-3.6 buildsystem contains small problem which causes some parallel builds to fail. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com --- .../icu/files/fix-parallel-build.patch | 19 +++ meta/recipes-support/icu/icu-3.6.inc |1

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] zaurusd: enable support for collie

2011-09-03 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com --- .../0001-zaurusd-add-support-for-collie.patch | 50 meta/recipes-bsp/zaurusd/zaurusd_git.bb|3 +- 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] gettext: use included libxml and libcroco

2011-09-03 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 3 sep. 2011, om 19:04 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: [YOCTO #1400] By using the included libxml and libcroco, we do not create additional on this core library. There was an ordering issue that when one library was not built, but gettext detected the other library a compliation

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] zaurusd: enable support for collie

2011-09-03 Thread Koen Kooi
shouldn't this move to meta-zaurus now that oe-core is qemu only? Op 3 sep. 2011, om 20:22 heeft Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov het volgende geschreven: Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com --- .../0001-zaurusd-add-support-for-collie.patch | 50

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] zaurusd: enable support for collie

2011-09-03 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
On 9/3/11, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: shouldn't this move to meta-zaurus now that oe-core is qemu only? Maybe. IIUC, currently the plan is to push meta-zaurus into meta-hh as published by Paul Eggleton. On the other hand we didn't start this move (yet). So please ignore this

[OE-core] [PATCH] image_types.bbclass: use per-image dirs for extX.gz images generation

2011-09-03 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Currently image_types.bbclass uses deploy/images/${MACHINE}tpm.gz dir for temporary files when generating extX.gz images. This can lead to races and strange errors during image generation. To overcome this use deploy/images/${MACHINE}tpm.gz-${PN} dir for temporary files. Signed-off-by: Dmitry

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] IMAGE_CMD_sdimg first cut

2011-09-03 Thread Jason Kridner
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Joel A Fernandes agnel.j...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Koen, Thanks for your feedback. On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 26 aug. 2011, om 21:54 heeft Joel A Fernandes het volgende geschreven: Here's an initial version

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] runqemu: standardize ability to specify custom qemu/kenel boot options

2011-09-03 Thread Scott Garman
The old manner of specifying custom options to QEMU in this script using angle brackets was a frequent source of confusion. Meanwhile, Otavio Salvador added a decent method of specifying custom kernel boot options to this script. This patch documents the bootparams option and adds a similar way of

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] runqemu fixes

2011-09-03 Thread Scott Garman
Hello, This pull request standardizes/normalizes the way custom options are passed to QEMU and the kernel boot parameters. The old manner of specifying custom options to QEMU in this script using angle brackets was a frequent source of confusion. Meanwhile, Otavio Salvador added a decent method

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] runqemu: standardize ability to specify custom qemu/kenel boot options

2011-09-03 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 19:50, Scott Garman scott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote: The old manner of specifying custom options to QEMU in this script using angle brackets was a frequent source of confusion. Meanwhile, Otavio Salvador added a decent method of specifying custom kernel boot options to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] systemtap: upgrade to 1.6

2011-09-03 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/02/2011 09:45 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: Also enable for arm, since systemtap now works on arm and remove the gcc-4.6 compile fix patch since the problems it addresses have been fixed upstream. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com --- .../fix_for_compilation_with_gcc-4.6.0.patch

Re: [OE-core] multilib: Only build one kernel

2011-09-03 Thread Xu, Dongxiao
Hi Richard, -Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:01 PM To: openembedded-core Subject: [OE-core] multilib: Only build one

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] opensp: Fix sstate relocation issue

2011-09-03 Thread Saul Wold
[YOCTO #1439] This fixes a problem where the native nsgmls has a path hard coded into it, therefor add a wrapper to set the environment with the correct paths for catalog files. Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-devtools/opensp/opensp_1.5.bb |9 - 1

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] groff: Fix sstate relocation issue

2011-09-03 Thread Saul Wold
[YOCTO #1439] This fixes a problem where the native groff has a path hard coded into it, therefor add a wrapper to set the command line with the correct paths for fonts and tmac directories. Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-extended/groff/groff_1.20.1.bb |9

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] sstate relocation patches

2011-09-03 Thread Saul Wold
This fixese 2 issues for doc generation discovered in the new autobuilder infrastruture with shared state. opensp and groff both had hard coded locations to look for data files. Sau! The following changes since commit 0616557a8c29b42bae0ffd5fd665a046810047e4: populate_sdk: We need to

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2][v2] systemtap: upgrade to 1.6

2011-09-03 Thread Tom Zanussi
This patchset upgrades systemtap to 1.6. The 1.6 version of systemtap also has inproved support for arm, so this enables it for arm and adds it to qemuarm. This upgrade was successfully tested on qemux86, qemux86-64, qemuppc, and qemuarm. The results and the tests can be found at the end of the

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2][v2] task-core-tools: add systemtap to qemuarm

2011-09-03 Thread Tom Zanussi
Systemtap now works with arm, so include it in task-core-tools-profile for qemuarm. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools.bb |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2][v2] systemtap: upgrade to 1.6

2011-09-03 Thread Tom Zanussi
Also enable for arm, since systemtap now works on arm and remove the gcc-4.6 compile fix patch since the problems it addresses have been fixed upstream. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com --- .../fix_for_compilation_with_gcc-4.6.0.patch | 119

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] systemtap: upgrade to 1.6

2011-09-03 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 20:46 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/02/2011 09:45 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: Also enable for arm, since systemtap now works on arm and remove the gcc-4.6 compile fix patch since the problems it addresses have been fixed upstream. [...] +PR = r5 +PV = 1.6+git${SRCPV}