Op 17 sep. 2011, om 04:55 heeft Chris Larson het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote:
Yes I know but wouldn't be better if you could base your work on
oe-core and avoid doing this?
For submitting to oe-core for pull requests,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 06:06, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
I don't see why it isn't reasonable. If they need a change done sooner
than can be done by pushing it upstream, they can put it into a local
layer until it makes it into oe-core. Seems simple enough to me.
Furthermore,
hi,
I've an HTC Dream, it has an armv6 CPU but lack a vfp unit.
I want to add correct support for it in meta-smartphone/meta-htc.
In order to have a correct machine config that works a tune inc file
must be required in it.
In openembedded-core there is no tune file yet for an armv6 that lacks a
On 09/16/2011 05:32 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:41 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
I ran into a bit of a nasty issue where EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES set in my
local.conf was causing core-image-initramfs to pull a bunch of files into
my initrd, including bash and a 100+MB vmlinux
Drop two unsed files (modules.order and modules.builtin) in do_install
to stop the unshipped files warning.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
index
MACHINE_KERNEL_PR was introduced long ago in org.oe.dev. It's present in
meta-oe kernel.bbclass. Several machines depend on this functionality.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0
As per org.oe.dev and meta-oe's kernel.bbclass move uImage creation to
separate task from do_deploy. The only major feature of oe-core's
version (not to recreate uImage if it exists) is retained in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
.cis firmware files are used by kernel to patch incorrect CIS fir PCMCIA
cards. Create respective packages.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
I have sent this in July and it was nacked. See at
https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/commit/5c53cbf951a11ed92fb2ad0837991db256c11489
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 19:18, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
dbarysh...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net
Signed-off-by: Dmitry
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 19:18, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
dbarysh...@gmail.com wrote:
MACHINE_KERNEL_PR was introduced long ago in org.oe.dev. It's present in
meta-oe kernel.bbclass. Several machines depend on this functionality.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
This was nack'ed but I don't remember why; Richard?
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 19:18, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
dbarysh...@gmail.com wrote:
As per org.oe.dev and meta-oe's kernel.bbclass move uImage creation to
separate task from do_deploy. The only major feature of oe-core's
version (not to
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
Op 27 aug. 2011, om 06:12 heeft Joel A Fernandes het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net
wrote:
Op 26 aug. 2011, om 02:28 heeft Joel A Fernandes het volgende
13 matches
Mail list logo
