[OE-core] [PATCH 6/8] python-gst: upgrade from 0.10.21 to 0.10.22

2011-11-16 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com --- ...python-gst_0.10.21.bb = python-gst_0.10.22.bb} |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-devtools/python/{python-gst_0.10.21.bb =

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/8] libpcre: upgrade from 8.12 to 8.20

2011-11-16 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com The license file has updated the copyright years, hence new checksum for license file. Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com --- .../libpcre/{libpcre_8.12.bb = libpcre_8.20.bb} |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4

[OE-core] [PATCH 7/8] update distro tracking recipe information

2011-11-16 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com --- .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc | 49 +++- 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH 8/8] insane.bbclass: avoid errors for x32 kernel

2011-11-16 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com x32 abi of x86_64 has 32bit userspace and the kernel is 64bit. The qa checking code was reporting this as errors for x32 kernel files and modules. This commit extends the condition in the checking code to avoid throwing the bitsize not matched error

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/8] libtool: upgrade from 2.4 to 2.4.2

2011-11-16 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Rebased patches to the newer source code Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com --- .../libtool/{libtool-2.4.inc = libtool-2.4.2.inc} |6 +- ...libtool-cross_2.4.bb = libtool-cross_2.4.2.bb} |2 +- ...btool-native_2.4.bb =

[OE-core] OE Changelog for 2011-11-7 to 2011-11-14

2011-11-16 Thread cliff . brake
Changelog for 2011-11-7 to 2011-11-14. Projects included in this report: bitbake: git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake openembedded-core: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core meta-openembedded: git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded meta-angstrom:

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] bitbake.conf: add a couple explicit vardeps

2011-11-16 Thread Chris Larson
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com --- meta/conf/bitbake.conf |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf index 0d6b3b8..c158c61 100644 --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf @@

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Add some explicit variable dependencies

2011-11-16 Thread Chris Larson
The following changes since commit a8ed4fcd79f6283c1d45f347dce894d784183900: xinit: rdepends on util-linux-mcookie to avoid brining whole util-linux (2011-11-11 11:00:56 +) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/kergoth/oe-core vardeps Christopher Larson (2):

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] Add some (mostly packaging) vardeps

2011-11-16 Thread Chris Larson
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com --- meta/classes/package.bbclass | 17 - meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass |1 + meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass |1 + meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass |1 + meta/classes/sstate.bbclass|

Re: [OE-core] What is the strategy to update eglibc?

2011-11-16 Thread Khem Raj
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Kang Kai kai.k...@windriver.com wrote: Hi Saul, I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and use svn commit revision 15225 as current version. Of course it is behind the latest svn revision, but I don't quit sure about which is the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/8] libtool: upgrade from 2.4 to 2.4.2

2011-11-16 Thread Khem Raj
did u look at http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/gold-updatesid=345f86369d165c9a41a4036c8b90662dc992f0f6 On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:14 AM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote: From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Rebased patches to the newer source code

[OE-core] [PATCH] libpcap: use binconfig class to deploy pcap-config

2011-11-16 Thread Jan Luebbe
This fixes building of tcpdump on hosts where libpcap-dev is installed. Also introduce INC_PR. Signed-off-by: Jan Luebbe jlue...@debian.org --- meta/recipes-connectivity/libpcap/libpcap.inc |4 +++- meta/recipes-connectivity/libpcap/libpcap_1.1.1.bb |2 +- 2 files changed, 4

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/8] libtool: upgrade from 2.4 to 2.4.2

2011-11-16 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Khem Raj Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 1:50 PM To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/8] libtool: upgrade from 2.4 to 2.4.2

2011-11-16 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Kamble, Nitin A nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote: Khem,   I did not see that commit, and I find the oecore/yocto is still behind for the version of libtool recipe. Any reason that commit is not in oecore? Thanks, there were some feedback on the patch I have

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] Add some (mostly packaging) vardeps

2011-11-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 14:17 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com --- meta/classes/package.bbclass | 17 - meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass |1 + meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass |1 +

[OE-core] [PATCH] libtool-cross: Upbreak and actually use more of it

2011-11-16 Thread Richard Purdie
We should be using libtool-cross for cross compiling but were not. This patch sets datadir so libtoolize ends up containing correct paths. It then installs libtoolize. The path ltmain.sh was installed to was incorrect and this is fixed. We also now install all the libtool m4 macros.

[OE-core] RFC: EFI Support

2011-11-16 Thread Darren Hart
I'm working to provide EFI boot support for the BSPs in the meta-intel layers for the Yocto Project. There are several points to consider and before I start work on an implementation, I would appreciate a review of this proposal. I'll present the various points to consider, and then follow with my

[OE-core] how to exclude files when packaging?

2011-11-16 Thread Ni Qingliang
Hello, All: I'm working on opensaf, wrote a bb file for it, and found that the FILES_${PN} has included /usr/lib/${PN}/*. but there are some .a and .so(symlink) in /usr/lib/${PN}, which will result QA issue. how to exclude some files (e.g. *.a, *.so) in FILES_${PN}? there

Re: [OE-core] What is the strategy to update eglibc?

2011-11-16 Thread Kang Kai
On 2011年11月17日 05:38, Khem Raj wrote: On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Kang Kaikai.k...@windriver.com wrote: Hi Saul, I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and use svn commit revision 15225 as current version. Of course it is behind the latest svn revision, but I

Re: [OE-core] What is the strategy to update eglibc?

2011-11-16 Thread Ni Qingliang
it looks like there is 2.14 bb file already, why the default eglibc stay on 2.13? On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:32 +0800, Kang Kai wrote: On 2011年11月17日 05:38, Khem Raj wrote: On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Kang Kaikai.k...@windriver.com wrote: Hi Saul, I just want to update eglibc but

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] sanitytest: Fix 2 bugs on non-rpm or non-procps installed image

2011-11-16 Thread Jiajun Xu
Current sanitytest will report failure on non-rpm or non-procps installed image. Add check for busybox/procps and use different option for different ps command. Remove rpm/zypper tests if image is not based on rpm. The following changes since commit da8425174529f10e16cde21fbea7f804284c38ae:

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] sanitytest: remove rpm/zypper tests if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not set package_rpm

2011-11-16 Thread Jiajun Xu
If PACKAGE_CLASSES does not set package_rpm as the first item, the root filesystem will not be generated based on rpm. We need remove rpm/zypper tests against non-rpm filesystem. [YOCTO #1757] Signed-off-by: Jiajun Xu jiajun...@intel.com --- meta/classes/imagetest-qemu.bbclass | 25

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] sanitytest: use different option for command ps from busybox and procps

2011-11-16 Thread Jiajun Xu
Current sanitytest use option -e for ps command, which only works for ps from procps. It fails if ps is provided by busybox. Add check to use different option for command from busybox and procps. [YOCTO #1756] Signed-off-by: Jiajun Xu jiajun...@intel.com ---

Re: [OE-core] What is the strategy to update eglibc?

2011-11-16 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Ni Qingliang niqingli...@insigma.com.cn wrote: it looks like there is 2.14 bb file already, why the default eglibc stay on 2.13? 2.14 removed some functionality rpc which is used extensively alternative to use libtirpc is not sufficient atm. Therefore we readded

Re: [OE-core] What is the strategy to update eglibc?

2011-11-16 Thread Ni Qingliang
Thanks for the explanation:) On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:41 +0800, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Ni Qingliang niqingli...@insigma.com.cn wrote: it looks like there is 2.14 bb file already, why the default eglibc stay on 2.13? 2.14 removed some functionality rpc which is