On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 18:29, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 18:14 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 18:11, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > We seem to be going in circles here but, to go back to what I
> > said at
> > the beginning, why can
Xiaofeng & Community:
We had a chat with Chris Larson and Mark Hatle here at ELC.
We focused this issue down to a fewer number of options that meet the
needs of the licenses. Please review this and let us know if there are
any issues or concerns.
Best Practices:
- Archive during build, w
On 11/02/12 05:02, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 22:30, Joshua Lock mailto:j...@linux.intel.com>> wrote:
The logic which looks for MACHINE overrides in SRC_URI and updates
PACKAGE_ARCH
accordingly doesn't account for SRC_URI overrides in layers.
It seems to address
On 02/13/2012 07:40 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
* seems like config/config in -L was also wrong
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian.inc | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-ca
Thanks Mark! Your suggestions led me to the solution. A while back I had added
the cap_sys_rawio capability to my python binary because of a tricky situation
involving needing to be able to issue mass storage device commands without
being the root user. Reinstalling python removed that capabilit
>Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:12:48 +
>From: Phil Blundell
>Subject: Re: [OE-core] Problems with Pseudo
>To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
>
>Message-ID: <1329509568.2591.119.ca...@x121e.pbcl.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
>On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 19:50 +
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 18:14 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 18:11, Phil Blundell wrote:
> We seem to be going in circles here but, to go back to what I
> said at
> the beginning, why can't you use the existing run-postinsts
> recipe
>
The usual cause of this error is either a system level protection, i.e.
grsecurity, app armor, or selinux policy that prevents preload libraries from
being loaded.
The other option is something is set "setuid" and that also prevents LD_PRELOAD
libraries from loading for security reasons.
Fin
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 18:11, Phil Blundell wrote:
> We seem to be going in circles here but, to go back to what I said at
> the beginning, why can't you use the existing run-postinsts recipe
> rather than adding a new script?
My image didn't end with it installed. I did a very small image and
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 19:50 +, Daniel Lazzari wrote:
> A problem just popped up today that I can't seem to fix. When trying to
> bitbake anything, I first get the following message:
>
> ERROR: ld.so: object 'libpseudo.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
> ignored.
>
> Followed by a bun
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 18:03 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 17:59, Phil Blundell wrote:
> Well, right, but that's not the run-postinsts package. You
> mentioned
> that opkg-cl wasn't installed so its own postinst is probably
> irrelevant
>
A problem just popped up today that I can't seem to fix. When trying to bitbake
anything, I first get the following message:
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libpseudo.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
ignored.
Followed by a bunch of debug output, detailing the configuration files being
loaded, th
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 17:59, Phil Blundell wrote:
> Well, right, but that's not the run-postinsts package. You mentioned
> that opkg-cl wasn't installed so its own postinst is probably irrelevant
> here.
That's why I added this.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 17:30 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I don't use dpkg but opkg.
>
>
> So, looking at opkg.inc we find out:
>
>
> ...
> pkg_postinst_${PN} () {
> #!/bin/sh
> if [ "x$D" != "x" ]; then
> install -d $D${sysconfdir}/rcS.d
Well, right, but that's not the run-postinst
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 17:25, Phil Blundell wrote:
> Er, does it? My copy doesn't seem to.
>
> pb@x121e:~/oe/oe-core$ grep opkg-cl
> meta/recipes-devtools/dpkg/run-postinsts/*
> pb@x121e:~/oe/oe-core$
>
> Where are you seeing the call to opkg-cl?
I don't use dpkg but opkg.
So, looking at opk
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 17:06 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 15:51, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 17:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > When building without package management we can end with a
> system
> > without opkg and t
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 15:51, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 17:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > When building without package management we can end with a system
> > without opkg and thus without support for running unfinished postinsts
> > on first boot, we fix this providing
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 17:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> When building without package management we can end with a system
> without opkg and thus without support for running unfinished postinsts
> on first boot, we fix this providing a S98configure script for this
> use case.
Isn't this what r
When building without package management we can end with a system
without opkg and thus without support for running unfinished postinsts
on first boot, we fix this providing a S98configure script for this
use case.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass | 16 +++
This fixes runtime requirement checking and read-only-fs checking.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass b/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass
index 5342035..2df8
The following changes since commit e5ad03093dfc4364d1407183f458df79f347c7a1:
guile: fix cross configure failure (2012-02-10 13:38:16 +)
are available in the git repository at:
git://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core master
https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/tree/HEAD
Otavio Salvador (3):
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass b/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass
index e72cf78..db88a8e 100644
--- a/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/
On Tuesday 14 February 2012 13:40:10 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Analysis of the recent output from buildhistory on the Yocto Project and
> Angstrom autobuilders showed a few anomalies and annoyances; this
> set of patches addresses all of the ones I noticed.
I've got one more patch to add to this, ple
Hi Saul, Darren and all,
This is actually v3 of the old patches("self-hosted-image: generate the
.hdddirect and .vmdk image files") I sent 1 month ago.
I'm sorry for sending this out so late, as I was pushed tightly on one other
task... :-(
The new recipe self-hosted-directdisk-image.bb invokes s
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui
---
meta/classes/syslinux.bbclass | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/syslinux.bbclass b/meta/classes/syslinux.bbclass
index 1569074..8225c80 100644
--- a/meta/classes/syslinux.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/syslinu
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui
---
meta/classes/boot-directdisk.bbclass |4 +++-
meta/conf/machine/include/qemu.inc |2 ++
.../images/self-hosted-directdisk-image.bb | 15 +++
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100
26 matches
Mail list logo
