Op 18 mrt. 2012, om 06:41 heeft Dexuan Cui het volgende geschreven:
[YOCTO #2065]
What does that mean?
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Koen Kooi wrote on 2012-03-18:
Op 18 mrt. 2012, om 06:41 heeft Dexuan Cui het volgende geschreven:
[YOCTO #2065]
What does that mean?
Sorry, I should have made it more clear. :-)
It means bug 2065 is addressed by the patch:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2065
Thanks,
Op 18 mrt. 2012, om 10:52 heeft Cui, Dexuan het volgende geschreven:
Koen Kooi wrote on 2012-03-18:
Op 18 mrt. 2012, om 06:41 heeft Dexuan Cui het volgende geschreven:
[YOCTO #2065]
What does that mean?
Sorry, I should have made it more clear. :-)
It means bug 2065 is addressed by
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:53 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 16 mrt. 2012, om 14:45 heeft Wang, Shane het volgende geschreven:
I built those recipes separately, built core-image-sato on qemux86
and qemuarm, and launched the image in the emulator and ran some
applications.
So no checks for
On 16.03.2012 11:56, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Friday 16 March 2012 01:20:44 Andreas Oberritter wrote:
Sorry, I messed up some details. In fact, pseudo-native doesn't get
rebuilt, but bitbake pseudo-native still gets executed for every
machine, unless $BUILDDIR/pseudodone is present and contains
i'm collecting a bunch of observations and suggestions about the
current bitbake manual -- should i continue posting them to
bitbake-devel, or should that list be reserved for actual bitbake
developer questions rather than documentation?
rday
--
On 03/18/2012 06:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:53 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 16 mrt. 2012, om 14:45 heeft Wang, Shane het volgende geschreven:
I built those recipes separately, built core-image-sato on qemux86
and qemuarm, and launched the image in the emulator and
Koen Kooi wrote on 2012-03-18:
Op 18 mrt. 2012, om 10:52 heeft Cui, Dexuan het volgende geschreven:
Koen Kooi wrote on 2012-03-18:
Op 18 mrt. 2012, om 06:41 heeft Dexuan Cui het volgende geschreven:
[YOCTO #2065]
What does that mean?
Sorry, I should have made it more clear. :-)
I have encountered a similar problem when do a clean building in another
VM (running archlinux).
after remove /usr//lib/libXrandr.so.2:
mv /usr/lib/../lib/libXrandr.so.2 /usr/lib/../lib/libXrandr.so.2.bak
I got a new error:
/usr/lib/../lib/libXext.so.6: undefined reference to `memcpy@GLIBC_2.14'
This fixed the warning in do_populate_lic task in sysvinit-inittab.
The following changes since commit efd80fd23cb96ccc203893017938c1163d20b898:
Richard Purdie (1):
tcl: Fix bad RPATH QA warning
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib
WARNING: .../sysvinit-inittab-2.88dsf-r6/sysvinit-2.88dsf/COPYING could
not be copied for some reason. It may not exist. WARN for now.
Signed-off-by: Lianhao Lu lianhao...@intel.com
---
.../sysvinit/sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf.bb |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1
On 2012年03月16日 15:25, Wang, Shane wrote:
Kang Kai wrote on 2012-03-14:
Update to version 1.0.25, and update patch
0001-alsactl-don-t-let-systemd-unit-restore-the-volume-wh.patch because
rejected when apply it.
Signed-off-by: Kang Kaikai.k...@windriver.com
Kai, why did you drop the patch?
Without this, in the target, we don't have the mount.nfs utility.
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui dexuan@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-self-hosted.bb |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-self-hosted.bb
The following changes since commit 0882b5e0adb05d4f950c721fcb80b4cff42ce079:
self-hosted-image: pre-populate the builder user with poky source (2012-03-19
09:31:19 +0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib dcui/self
14 matches
Mail list logo
