[OE-core] gcc-cross: Argument list too long

2012-04-13 Thread Robert Yang
There would be an error when building gcc-cross in the do_install stage if the TMPDIR's length is more than 200 characters: make[1]: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long This is because of the limit of /usr/include/linux/limits.h: $ grep PATH_MAX /usr/include/linux/limits.h #define

Re: [OE-core] Yocto Project 1.2 M4 schedule

2012-04-13 Thread Andrei Gherzan
On Apr 13, 2012 12:30 AM, Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 17:13 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: Should we put it to vote? While we still have time before the release, we need to agree on the naming eventually. To be honest, it seems to me like a vote would be a

Re: [OE-core] [V4 2/2] PR bump packages with gdbm in DEPENDS

2012-04-13 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:54:14PM +0300, Andrei Gherzan wrote: This is done because of this change in gdbm: gdbm: Package compat libs in gdbm-compat Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan and...@gherzan.ro --- meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.14.2.bb |2 +-

Re: [OE-core] gcc-cross: Argument list too long

2012-04-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 14:45 +0800, Robert Yang wrote: There would be an error when building gcc-cross in the do_install stage if the TMPDIR's length is more than 200 characters: make[1]: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long This is because of the limit of /usr/include/linux/limits.h:

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] grub 1.99: fix build for gcc 4.7

2012-04-13 Thread Robert Yang
I've done a bitbake world on Fedora 17 64bit (MACHINE = qemux86-64), the failed pkgs are mklibs-native (have sent patch) and grub as far as I know. Will try bitbake core-image-sato with MACHINE = qemuarm/qemuppc/qemux86 and bitbake world with MACHINE = qemux86 on Fedora 17 64bit this night. Test

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] grub 1.99: fix build for gcc 4.7

2012-04-13 Thread Robert Yang
There was an error when build with gcc 4.7 (FC 17 64bit): | fs/zfs/zfs.c: In function 'get_filesystem_dnode': | fs/zfs/zfs.c:1449:7: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing] .. cc1: all warnings being treated as errors While compare

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] grub 1.99: fix build for gcc 4.7

2012-04-13 Thread Robert Yang
On 04/13/2012 05:41 PM, Robert Yang wrote: I've done a bitbake world on Fedora 17 64bit (MACHINE = qemux86-64), The MACHINE is qemux86 (not qemux86-64), sorry for the mistake. the failed pkgs are mklibs-native (have sent patch) and grub as far as I know. Will try bitbake core-image-sato

Re: [OE-core] cleanup-workdir

2012-04-13 Thread Andreas Oberritter
On 13.04.2012 03:49, Kang Kai wrote: On 2012年04月13日 02:47, Andreas Oberritter wrote: Hello Kai, because I was low on disk space, I just tried scripts/cleanup-workdir for the first time. My observations: Hi Andreas, 1.) It deletes work directories that were built for other machines

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Dexuan: nspr: fix package splitin

2012-04-13 Thread Dexuan Cui
The following changes since commit f81b0593e74a31cb2d992df0583948ff57e3ed98: gdbm: Activate -enable-libgdbm-compat and add symlinks to headers in include/gdbm (2012-03-23 17:56:29 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib dcui/master

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] nspr: fix package spliting

2012-04-13 Thread Dexuan Cui
Here /usr/lib/lib*.so files are binaries rather than symbol links. We should package them into ${PN} rather than ${PN}-dev, or else, when a package, that rdepends on nspr, is packaged, we get a non-dev package rdepends on nspr-dev ERROR. Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui dexuan@intel.com ---

[OE-core] [V5 0/2] Package gdbm compat libs in gdbm-compat and PR bumps

2012-04-13 Thread Andrei Gherzan
V4 had some commits sent to oe-core and are not merged and forgot about those. This led to a confict in python bb file. The following changes since commit 6703173449ad21e1623ac75a66535cb2ed52aeeb: package_rpm.bbclass: Set tmppath for rpm to somewhere which won't conflict with the rootfs

[OE-core] [V5 1/2] gdbm: Package compat libs in gdbm-compat

2012-04-13 Thread Andrei Gherzan
In order to avoid breaking packages which depend on old package name libgdbm4 (= 1.10), compat libs are packaged into a separate package named gdbm-compat. Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan and...@gherzan.ro --- meta/recipes-support/gdbm/gdbm_1.10.bb |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6

[OE-core] [V5 2/2] PR bump packages with gdbm in DEPENDS

2012-04-13 Thread Andrei Gherzan
This is done because of this change in gdbm: gdbm: Package compat libs in gdbm-compat Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan and...@gherzan.ro --- meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.14.2.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-devtools/python/python_2.7.2.bb |2 +- .../pulseaudio/pulseaudio_1.1.bb

Re: [OE-core] [V4 2/2] PR bump packages with gdbm in DEPENDS

2012-04-13 Thread Andrei Gherzan
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:03, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:54:14PM +0300, Andrei Gherzan wrote: This is done because of this change in gdbm: gdbm: Package compat libs in gdbm-compat Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan and...@gherzan.ro ---

Re: [OE-core] Yocto Project 1.2 M4 schedule

2012-04-13 Thread Anders Darander
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 21:46, Philip Balister phi...@balister.org wrote: On 04/12/2012 11:40 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 14:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 14:22, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: You just volunteered to handle all the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] qt4-x11-free: enable -accessibility and -sm

2012-04-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 22:00 +0800, Robert Yang wrote: Is there any suggestions for this one please? This is a change suitable for post 1.2 so it needs to wait until after release. Cheers, Richard ___ Openembedded-core mailing list

[OE-core] [PATCH] perl: fix re-execution of task

2012-04-13 Thread Venkata ramana gollamudi
perl package do_configure is changing /perl-5.14.2/patches/h2ph-multiarch.diff from link to normal file in the process of correcting the paths. So when patch task is re-executed after complete package building, giving error. This path correction is not required for links as the link target file

[OE-core] [PATCH] boost: fix re-execution of task

2012-04-13 Thread Venkata ramana gollamudi
After building boost package, re-execution of boostconfig task followed by re-execution of compile task is giving following error error: duplicate initialization of gcc with the following parameters during compilation It is because multiple entries of gcc are being added during boostconfig

[OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: fix re-execution of task

2012-04-13 Thread Venkata ramana gollamudi
Task do_patch_append calling do_fix_ia_headers is removing files using rm not rm -f. So first time execution of patch task is success, while re-execution of patch task fails as it tries to remove the files already removed. So changed rm to rm -f. [Yocto #2194] Signed-off-by: Venkata Ramana

[OE-core] [PATCH] gcc-4.6: Add fix for relocation problem and ccache

2012-04-13 Thread Richard Purdie
If the toolchain is reused from sstate and ccache is installed, build failures were occuring due to gcc trying to access the original sysroot rather than the new one, particularly if the old sysroot existed but was not readable by the current user. This turns out of the an issue inside gcc to do

Re: [OE-core] [V5 1/2] gdbm: Package compat libs in gdbm-compat

2012-04-13 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:34:18PM +0300, Andrei Gherzan wrote: In order to avoid breaking packages which depend on old package name libgdbm4 (= 1.10), compat libs are packaged into a separate package named gdbm-compat. Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan and...@gherzan.ro Acked-by: Martin Jansa

Re: [OE-core] [V5 2/2] PR bump packages with gdbm in DEPENDS

2012-04-13 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:34:19PM +0300, Andrei Gherzan wrote: This is done because of this change in gdbm: gdbm: Package compat libs in gdbm-compat Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan and...@gherzan.ro Acked-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com ---

[OE-core] [PATCH] pseudo: default NO32LIBS to 1

2012-04-13 Thread Paul Eggleton
If this value is not set to 1, then systems with some 32-bit libraries but no 32-bit version of libgcc installed will have pseudo-native fail at do_compile. It should only really be set to 0 by those who know what they are doing. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com ---

[OE-core] [PATCH] default-distrovars: remove NO32LIBS setting

2012-04-13 Thread Paul Eggleton
The ??= assignment in pseudo.inc effectively nullifies this ??= assignment here, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com --- meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc |2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base.bbclass: Fix PACKAGECONFIG issues with native and nativesdk BBCLASSEXTEND recipes (and multilib)

2012-04-13 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:04:18PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: This patch fixes up the issues that were being seen where BBCLASSEXTEND and PACKAGECONFIG were interacting badly. It also ensures PACKAGECONFIG interacts properly with multilib builds. Ideally some of this code will be

[OE-core] [PATCHv2] gcc-4.6: Add fix for relocation problem and ccache

2012-04-13 Thread Richard Purdie
If the toolchain is reused from sstate and ccache is installed, build failures were occuring due to gcc trying to access the original sysroot rather than the new one, particularly if the old sysroot existed but was not readable by the current user. This turns out of the an issue inside gcc to do

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] pseudo: default NO32LIBS to 1

2012-04-13 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/13/2012 05:35 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: If this value is not set to 1, then systems with some 32-bit libraries but no 32-bit version of libgcc installed will have pseudo-native fail at do_compile. It should only really be set to 0 by those who know what they are doing. Signed-off-by: Paul

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] default-distrovars: remove NO32LIBS setting

2012-04-13 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/13/2012 05:40 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: The ??= assignment in pseudo.inc effectively nullifies this ??= assignment here, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggletonpaul.eggle...@linux.intel.com --- meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc |2 -- 1 files changed, 0

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Two small fixes, pseudo and rpm

2012-04-13 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/12/2012 02:21 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: pseudo was adding in an rpath, prevent that rpm-native was not resolving dependencies that looked like possible filename properly. The following changes since commit 71e95c744eaa4dda1b3237db2e13f666f121c92b: package_rpm.bbclass: Set tmppath for

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] pseudo: Tell pseudo to avoid specifying an RPATH

2012-04-13 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/12/2012 02:21 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: [Yocto #2251] Add --without-rpath to avoid embedding rpaths into the pseudo components. Signed-off-by: Mark Hatlemark.ha...@windriver.com --- meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo.inc|8 meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_1.3.bb |

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] pseudo: Tell pseudo to avoid specifying an RPATH

2012-04-13 Thread Mark Hatle
On 4/13/12 10:13 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 04/12/2012 02:21 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: [Yocto #2251] Add --without-rpath to avoid embedding rpaths into the pseudo components. Signed-off-by: Mark Hatlemark.ha...@windriver.com --- meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo.inc|8

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] perl: fix re-execution of task

2012-04-13 Thread richard . purdie
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.14.2.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.14.2.bb @@ -164,8 +164,12 @@ do_configure() { esac # These are strewn all over the source tree for foo in `grep -I -m1 \/usr\/include\/.*\\.h ${WORKDIR}/* -r | cut -f 1 -d :`

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] pseudo: Tell pseudo to avoid specifying an RPATH

2012-04-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 10:22 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: We might still need this rpath or something similar since the nativesdk now breaks not finding the correct version of the included libc.so.6 In this case, I don't think embedding a static RPATH makes sense, but perhaps a $ORIGIN path

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] pseudo: Tell pseudo to avoid specifying an RPATH

2012-04-13 Thread Mark Hatle
On 4/13/12 10:33 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 10:22 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: We might still need this rpath or something similar since the nativesdk now breaks not finding the correct version of the included libc.so.6 In this case, I don't think embedding a static RPATH

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] pseudo: Tell pseudo to avoid specifying an RPATH

2012-04-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 10:40 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 4/13/12 10:33 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 10:22 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: We might still need this rpath or something similar since the nativesdk now breaks not finding the correct version of the included libc.so.6

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] perl: fix re-execution of task

2012-04-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Venkata ramana gollamudi ramana.gollam...@huawei.com wrote: +               # D2194:Fixing the issue patch file link is replaced with modified file +               # Ignore if file is a link, as actual file will also get caught during grep That comment

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] boost: fix re-execution of task

2012-04-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Venkata ramana gollamudi ramana.gollam...@huawei.com wrote: +       # D2194:Fixing the failure of error: duplicate initialization of gcc with the following parameters during compilation. same here. ___

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2] gcc-4.6: Add fix for relocation problem and ccache

2012-04-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: If the toolchain is reused from sstate and ccache is installed, build failures were occuring due to gcc trying to access the original sysroot rather than the new one, particularly if the old sysroot

[OE-core] Fwd: ARM hard-float linker path - consensus

2012-04-13 Thread Khem Raj
FYI this will impact us in coming time. If someone has questions please bring it up -- Forwarded message -- From: Steve McIntyre steve.mcint...@linaro.org Date: Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM Subject: ARM hard-float linker path - consensus To: cross-dis...@lists.linaro.org Cc:

Re: [OE-core] Fwd: ARM hard-float linker path - consensus

2012-04-13 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:11:02AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: FYI this will impact us in coming time. If someone has questions please bring it up While it's a slightly unexpected outcome (/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3) it's still good to see some agreement here. Do we want to make the necessary

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] systemtap doc build fix

2012-04-13 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com This patchset fixes a documentation build problem with docproc, then turns documentation generation off by default, since when it works, it adds a lot to the build time. The following changes since commit 04b16f1038f7cae445d741e86c2cc19c70f991c1: Andrei

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] systemtap: fix docproc build error

2012-04-13 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com When building docs in systemtap, docproc is used to generate the tapset documentation, but it gets built for the target, while it needs to be build for the host instead. This change causes that to happen. Fixes [YOCTO #2193]. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] systemtap: disable document generation by default

2012-04-13 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com Building the systemtap documentation adds significantly to the build time, so disable it by default. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap_git.bb |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0

Re: [OE-core] Fwd: ARM hard-float linker path - consensus

2012-04-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:11:02AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: FYI this will impact us in coming time. If someone has questions please bring it up While it's a slightly unexpected outcome (/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3) it's

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] grub 1.99: fix build for gcc 4.7

2012-04-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com wrote: There was an error when build with gcc 4.7 (FC 17 64bit): | fs/zfs/zfs.c: In function 'get_filesystem_dnode': | fs/zfs/zfs.c:1449:7: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] linux-yocto/3.2: add igb support to romley

2012-04-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Updating the 3.2 recipe SRCREVs to pickup the following meta change: [ meta: Add igb.scc to Romley Romley machine has 82580 Giga bit Ethernet Controller. Add the relavent Nic driver to it. Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com ] Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] linux-yocto: (hopefully) final fixes

2012-04-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Richard/Saul, Here are two last commits for linux-yocto. One is a pending SRCREV update for the romley. It's included to make sure that the meta branch head matches the SRCREVs. Otherwise, we are relying on branch renaming for everyone. There's no risk, and this is already in use by the BSP

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto: allow .cfg, .scc, .patch and defconfigs to be processed in order

2012-04-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
During testing/extension of the linux-yocto-tiny kernel it was found that defconfigs were not always properly applied. This was due to two issues: - not being able to fully control the order of objects applied to the git tree on the SRC_URI - defconfigs triggering --allnoconfig before

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2] gcc-4.6: Add fix for relocation problem and ccache

2012-04-13 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
I suspect this would effect 1.1.2. -M On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: If the toolchain is reused from sstate and ccache is installed, build failures were occuring due to gcc trying to access the original sysroot rather than the new

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] linux-yocto: (hopefully) final fixes

2012-04-13 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/13/2012 01:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Richard/Saul, Here are two last commits for linux-yocto. One is a pending SRCREV update for the romley. It's included to make sure that the meta branch head matches the SRCREVs. Otherwise, we are relying on branch renaming for everyone. There's no

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] Bug 2134 - bitbake package-index fails for rpm

2012-04-13 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/11/2012 07:26 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: The bug is that the native python used to run genpkgmetadata.py is picking up host's python modules. More about this. RPM is built without python. And this modules is needed by the above py file. So: 1. rpm-native should be built with python

Re: [OE-core] [V5 0/2] Package gdbm compat libs in gdbm-compat and PR bumps

2012-04-13 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/13/2012 03:33 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: V4 had some commits sent to oe-core and are not merged and forgot about those. This led to a confict in python bb file. The following changes since commit 6703173449ad21e1623ac75a66535cb2ed52aeeb: package_rpm.bbclass: Set tmppath for rpm to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: fix re-execution of task

2012-04-13 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/13/2012 04:44 AM, Venkata ramana gollamudi wrote: Task do_patch_append calling do_fix_ia_headers is removing files using rm not rm -f. So first time execution of patch task is success, while re-execution of patch task fails as it tries to remove the files already removed. So changed rm

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] boost: fix re-execution of task

2012-04-13 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/13/2012 04:42 AM, Venkata ramana gollamudi wrote: After building boost package, re-execution of boostconfig task followed by re-execution of compile task is giving following error error: duplicate initialization of gcc with the following parameters during compilation It is because

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] mklibs-native 0.1.33: include unistd.h to fix build for gcc 4.7

2012-04-13 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/12/2012 06:43 AM, Robert Yang wrote: Test info: Has been tested on: Fedora 17 64bit Fedora 16 64bit Ubuntu 10.10 32bit // Robert The following changes since commit c37faea947ef3980934c02661ecd79cd9668b8a6: libunistring: Fix parallel make issue (2012-04-12 12:37:52 +0100) are

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] grub 1.99: fix build for gcc 4.7

2012-04-13 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Khem Raj Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:21 PM To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1]

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] nspr: fix package spliting

2012-04-13 Thread Darren Hart
On 04/13/2012 03:04 AM, Dexuan Cui wrote: Here /usr/lib/lib*.so files are binaries rather than symbol links. We should package them into ${PN} rather than ${PN}-dev, or else, when a package, that rdepends on nspr, is packaged, we get a non-dev package rdepends on nspr-dev ERROR. Applied and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] grub 1.99: fix build for gcc 4.7

2012-04-13 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Kamble, Nitin A Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 4:43 PM To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] grub 1.99: fix build for gcc 4.7

2012-04-13 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Khem Raj Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:20 PM To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1]

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] misc critical bugfixes for fedora 17 alpha

2012-04-13 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com The eglibc fix is done differently now. grub recipe is fixed to use the gcc-cross compiler grub grub-efi-native recipes are fixed for gcc4.7 compiler more details in the commit messages. Nitin The following changes since commit

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] grub-1.99: use gcc-cross for building the target binaries

2012-04-13 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com It was using distro gcc to build binaries for target. This got detected on fedora 17 alpha, on which it hit an gcc-4.7 issue. This Fixes Bug: [Yocto #2291] Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] grub-efi-native, grub: fix build with gcc 4.7

2012-04-13 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com This fixes bug [YOCTO #2293] These build failure caused by gcc4.7 is fixed with a backport of a grub-1.99 patch from fedora 17 alpha plus two more new patches | gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wall -W -I../include -I../include -DGRUB_MACHINE_EFI=1

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] eglibc: fix builds on fedora 17 alpha

2012-04-13 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Generally distros keep perl at /sur/bin/perl Fedora 17 alpha also has /bin/perl this causes eglibc build on such distros to put perl interpreter path in the perl scripts as /bin/perl But we set perl location for target as /usr/bin/perl This