Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] libx11: don't split libX11-xcb out into a libx11-xcb package

2012-09-11 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 10 sep. 2012, om 19:20 heeft Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com het volgende geschreven: As XCB is a hard requirement for libX11, and libX11-xcb.so is a deprecated 3KB .so, it's not worth splitting it into a separate package. What's the upgrade path? This commit will create a clash because

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf.bb: only run serial checks at boot if we have items to check

2012-09-11 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 10 sep. 2012, om 21:09 heeft Matthew McClintock m...@freescale.com het volgende geschreven: Right now, we delay running the serial console checks to we boot up. This causes issues for read only file systems. So, if have not configured any serial ports to check via

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto/3.4: v3.4.10 and uprobes/kprobes configuration updates

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: Updating to 3.4.10 which has been soaking for a bit now, as well as picking up the following meta commits from Tom Z: a82db2f meta: have systemtap use kprobes and uprobes feature d5d5b80 meta: add kprobes

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] sanity.bbclass: Move back to running at ConfigParsed time

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 15:21 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: If we don't do this, users can get extremely confused

[OE-core] DEPENDS_virtclass-native = libpng jpeg not extended to libpng-native jpeg-native

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
Hi, in meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libwmf/libwmf_0.2.8.4.bb: DEPENDS_virtclass-native = libpng jpeg DEPENDS = libpng jpeg expat gtk+ BBCLASSEXTEND = native Did it work (at least at some point of time) that DEPENDS for libwmf-native were expanded to libpng-native and jpeg-native?

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] gettext: Make gettext 0.16.1 extend native and nativesdk.

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Ertsaas
gettext 0.16.1 is a GPLv2 version of gettext. Making that extend native and nativesdk makes sure we use the same version of gettext for compiling internally as well as in our toolchain. Signed-off-by: Martin Ertsaas mert...@cisco.com --- meta/recipes-core/gettext/gettext_0.16.1.bb |2 ++ 1

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] bash: Make bash_3.2.48 a nativesdk package.

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Ertsaas
3.2.48 is the bash package in oe-core which is not GPLv3. Making that a nativesdk package makes sure we have the same bash version in our toolchain as in our image. Signed-off-by: Martin Ertsaas mert...@cisco.com --- meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash_3.2.48.bb |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2

Re: [OE-core] DEPENDS_virtclass-native = libpng jpeg not extended to libpng-native jpeg-native

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 10:03 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Hi, in meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libwmf/libwmf_0.2.8.4.bb: DEPENDS_virtclass-native = libpng jpeg DEPENDS = libpng jpeg expat gtk+ BBCLASSEXTEND = native Did it work (at least at some point of time) that DEPENDS

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] webkit-gtk: work around Make bug by re-running make

2012-09-11 Thread Burton, Ross
On 10 September 2012 22:23, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 17:14 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 17:02 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: +# fixed in Make CVS, so 3.83 won't have this problem. I know this will be painful, but did you consider looking

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] libx11: don't split libX11-xcb out into a libx11-xcb package

2012-09-11 Thread Burton, Ross
On 11 September 2012 07:22, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: What's the upgrade path? This commit will create a clash because now 2 packages will provide the same file. Is that pain really worth it? The pain is just a matter of some dependencies I - again :( - forgot to add. The

[OE-core] /usr/bin/python is needed by git

2012-09-11 Thread Jack Mitchell
= 1.2+snapshot-20120911 TUNE_FEATURES = armv7a vfp neon cortexa8 TARGET_FPU= vfp-neon meta meta-yocto= master:7250638ec895bc89508711831083d43b9e1e9826 meta-ti = master:7b54887b9505bb8334bfbe4094a2c396add8da48 meta-db = master

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] classes/sanity: skip tune checks if machine is invalid

2012-09-11 Thread Paul Eggleton
If there is no valid machine configuration it's almost guaranteed that the tune checks will fail, so just suppress them in that case. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com --- meta/classes/sanity.bbclass | 10 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] sanity.bbclass: Move back to running at ConfigParsed time

2012-09-11 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 08:39:39 Martin Jansa wrote: Today with latest oe-core and bitbake I've set MACHINE=pitz (instead of spitz) and the output doesn't look very tidy. Shows couple of DEBUG entries even without debug enabled and then actuall ERROR, see attached log. I've just sent a

[OE-core] [PATCH] connman: remove trailing whitespace

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc b/meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc index 59ec1fa..5b94a1e 100644

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] bash: Make bash_3.2.48 a nativesdk package.

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 09/11/12 10:29, Martin Ertsaas wrote: 3.2.48 is the bash package in oe-core which is not GPLv3. Making that a nativesdk package makes sure we have the same bash version in our toolchain as in our image. Signed-off-by: Martin Ertsaas mert...@cisco.com ---

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH 1/2] opkg svn: Add the --force-arch option

2012-09-11 Thread Robert Yang
Hi All, Thank you very much for your suggestions, do we have a final solution or work around please? If we refer to the rpm, it doesn't care about the package's version, it just selects the newest build package, I had applied a patch to make it respect to the arch before. It seems that we

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto/3.4: v3.4.10 and uprobes/kprobes configuration updates

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:31:42AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 02:59 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: Updating to 3.4.10 which has been soaking for a bit now, as well as picking up the following meta

[OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
Hi, when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) resulting packages are tuned with -mtune=xscale (when built for spitz) or -mtune=arm926ej-s (when built for qemuarm). From https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1916#c5 Firstly, if you go changing the tune

Re: [OE-core] /usr/bin/python is needed by git

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Hatle
= poky DISTRO_VERSION= 1.2+snapshot-20120911 TUNE_FEATURES = armv7a vfp neon cortexa8 TARGET_FPU= vfp-neon meta meta-yocto= master:7250638ec895bc89508711831083d43b9e1e9826 meta-ti = master:7b54887b9505bb8334bfbe4094a2c396add8da48 meta-db = master

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto/3.4: v3.4.10 and uprobes/kprobes configuration updates

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-09-11 08:37 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:31:42AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 02:59 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: Updating to 3.4.10 which has been soaking for a bit now, as

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto/3.4: v3.4.10 and uprobes/kprobes configuration updates

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:27:50AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 08:37 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:31:42AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 02:59 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com

Re: [OE-core] /usr/bin/python is needed by git

2012-09-11 Thread Jack Mitchell
MACHINE = beaglebone DISTRO= poky DISTRO_VERSION= 1.2+snapshot-20120911 TUNE_FEATURES = armv7a vfp neon cortexa8 TARGET_FPU= vfp-neon meta meta-yocto= master:7250638ec895bc89508711831083d43b9e1e9826 meta-ti = master

[OE-core] [PATCH] nativesdk-qemu: fix SDK relocation issue

2012-09-11 Thread Laurentiu Palcu
User mode emulation binaries are linked using a local linker script. The nativesdk ones were not used and the resulting binaries did not have the interp section resized. Hence, those binaries could not be relocated. [YOCTO #3083] Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu laurentiu.pa...@intel.com ---

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Hi, when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) resulting packages are tuned with -mtune=xscale (when built for spitz) or -mtune=arm926ej-s (when built for qemuarm). From

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix nativesdk-qemu relocation issue

2012-09-11 Thread Laurentiu Palcu
Changes in V2: - bump PR Thanks, Laurentiu The following changes since commit 7250638ec895bc89508711831083d43b9e1e9826: upstream_tracking: Fix format issues (2012-09-10 23:21:12 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib

[OE-core] [PATCH] libgpg-error: Use the source file for the licence checksum

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
It makes sense to us the license checksum from the source .in file rather than that from the generated file which configure can change (or remove). Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org --- diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libgpg-error/libgpg-error_1.10.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH] arch-ia32: Add x32 to MACHINEOVERRIDES

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
This will allow the KERNEL_FEATURES to trigger the x32 ABI via overrides Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] libgnome-keyring: add missing DEPENDS on intltool-native

2012-09-11 Thread jackie.huang
From: Jackie Huang jackie.hu...@windriver.com The following changes since commit 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7: classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists (2012-09-10 21:52:37 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libgnome-keyring: add missing DEPENDS on intltool-native

2012-09-11 Thread jackie.huang
From: Jackie Huang jackie.hu...@windriver.com libgnome-keyring requires command 'intltoolize' in configure, so add DEPENDS intltool-native. [YOCTO #3081] Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang jackie.hu...@windriver.com --- .../recipes-gnome/gnome/libgnome-keyring_2.32.0.bb |4 ++-- 1 files changed,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arch-ia32: Add x32 to MACHINEOVERRIDES

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: This will allow the KERNEL_FEATURES to trigger the x32 ABI via overrides Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] linux-yocto: x32 and features update

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Richard/Saul, This is my part of a change that Saul will complete with the addition of x32 as a machine override for x86 BSPs that have x32 as their tuning. With this change, the x32 configuration fragment will be appended to any give x86 BSP configuration and it will support the userspace

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] linux-yocto*: append to KERNEL_FEATURES instead of assigning

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
It is sometimes useful for KERNEL_FEATURES to be set in a machine or other configuration file. The linux-yocto recipes currently initialize the variable, which clobbers any values set by .conf files. Appending to the variables allows these settings to propagate to the kernel configuration, while

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have CONFIG_X86_X32=y. This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the KERNEL_FEATURES when x32 is the tuning for a given machine. cc: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have CONFIG_X86_X32=y. This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the KERNEL_FEATURES when x32 is the tuning for a given machine. cc: Saul Wold

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arch-ia32: Add x32 to MACHINEOVERRIDES

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 08:13 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: This will allow the KERNEL_FEATURES to trigger the x32 ABI via overrides Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc |1 + 1 files

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have CONFIG_X86_X32=y. This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the KERNEL_FEATURES when x32 is the tuning for a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have CONFIG_X86_X32=y. This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] git: add missing Python dependency

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/11/12 5:33 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote: From: Jack Mitchell jack.mitch...@dbbroadcast.co.uk Add python to DEPENDS as it fails to install on target with RPM failing at do_rootfs due to un-met dependencies. Signed-off-by: Jack Mitchell jack.mitch...@dbbroadcast.co.uk ---

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Hi, when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) resulting packages are tuned with -mtune=xscale (when built for spitz) or -mtune=arm926ej-s (when built for

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arch-ia32: Add x32 to MACHINEOVERRIDES

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/11/12 10:36 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:13 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: This will allow the KERNEL_FEATURES to trigger the x32 ABI via overrides Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com ---

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arch-ia32: Add x32 to MACHINEOVERRIDES

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:36 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:13 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: This will allow the KERNEL_FEATURES to trigger the x32 ABI via overrides Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com ---

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf.bb: only run serial checks at boot if we have items to check

2012-09-11 Thread Matthew McClintock
Right now, we delay running the serial console checks to we boot up. This causes issues for read only file systems. So, if have not configured any serial ports to check via SERIAL_CONSOLES_CHECK we can skip the check at boot. This fixes any issues with read only file systems and ipk packaging.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have CONFIG_X86_X32=y. This can be

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Hi, when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) resulting packages are tuned with -mtune=xscale

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] image_types.bbclass: Round up ROOTFS_SIZE after base_size check

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/10/2012 11:18 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: If we round up ROOTFS_SIZE to IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT before checking if base_size is greater then IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE, we can end up adding an unaligned value to IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE. Obviously, if IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE was overwritten with an

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/11/12 10:59 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Hi, when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) resulting

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 11 sep. 2012, om 17:51 heeft Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com het volgende geschreven: On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Hi, when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) resulting

[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED REQUEST 00/13] Misc Fixes (cover only)

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
The following changes since commit 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7: classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists (2012-09-10 21:52:37 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stage

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] Package upgrades

2012-09-11 Thread Constantin Musca
This is another set of package upgrades compiled on all architectures and tested using core-image-sato. The following changes since commit 7250638ec895bc89508711831083d43b9e1e9826: upstream_tracking: Fix format issues (2012-09-10 23:21:12 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] sysstat: upgrade to 10.1.1

2012-09-11 Thread Constantin Musca
Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca constantinx.mu...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-extended/sysstat/sysstat_10.0.5.bb |8 meta/recipes-extended/sysstat/sysstat_10.1.1.bb |8 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED REQUEST 00/13] Misc Fixes (cover only)

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 09:14 AM, Saul Wold wrote: The following changes since commit 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7: classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists (2012-09-10 21:52:37 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:09:53AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 9/11/12 10:59 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Hi, when building

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 11/32] sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf.bb: Allow multiple serial port consoles to be defined

2012-09-11 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 14:14 -0700, Scott Garman wrote: +pkg_postinst_${PN} () { +# run this on the target +if [ x$D == x ]; then By the way, == is a bashism; that should just be = for portability. Or you can use '-z $D'

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 15:01 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Shouldn't spitz produce something like armv5te-xscale and qemuarm armv5te-arm926ejs? That's a DISTRO policy decision really. armv5te, in common with most of the PACKAGE_ARCHes, represents an ISA. That is, it is guaranteed to only contain

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 05:46:12PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 15:01 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Shouldn't spitz produce something like armv5te-xscale and qemuarm armv5te-arm926ejs? That's a DISTRO policy decision really. armv5te, in common with most of the

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 18:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: If we drop DEFAULTTUNE from tune-xscale and tune-arm926ejs then PACKAGE_ARCH=armv5te would be the same and the same feed will be built only once. Well, that would also make those two tune files rather useless. It seems like it would be

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:14:22PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 18:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: If we drop DEFAULTTUNE from tune-xscale and tune-arm926ejs then PACKAGE_ARCH=armv5te would be the same and the same feed will be built only once. Well, that would also

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:21:07PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:14:22PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 18:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: If we drop DEFAULTTUNE from tune-xscale and tune-arm926ejs then PACKAGE_ARCH=armv5te would be the same and

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 19:35 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: If this works then DISTRO would have finer control of which DEFAULTTUNE to use 1) default: don't use mtune, optimize only for march (don't mix mtune in the same feed). 2) include optimized-tune.inc in distro.conf: use mtune only for

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:37:23PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 19:35 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: If this works then DISTRO would have finer control of which DEFAULTTUNE to use 1) default: don't use mtune, optimize only for march (don't mix mtune in the same feed).

[OE-core] [PATCH v3] sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf.bb: only run serial checks at boot if we have items to check

2012-09-11 Thread Matthew McClintock
Right now, we delay running the serial console checks to we boot up. This causes issues for read only file systems. So, if have not configured any serial ports to check via SERIAL_CONSOLES_CHECK we can skip the check at boot. This fixes any issues with read only file systems and ipk packaging.

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/11/12 12:43 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:37:23PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 19:35 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: If this works then DISTRO would have finer control of which DEFAULTTUNE to use 1) default: don't use mtune, optimize only for march

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf.bb: only run serial checks at boot if we have items to check

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:56 -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: Right now, we delay running the serial console checks to we boot up. This causes issues for read only file systems. So, if have not configured any serial ports to check via SERIAL_CONSOLES_CHECK we can skip the check at boot. This

[OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: Restore ${PN} to before ${PN}-dev in PACKAGES

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
Commit 13544fbc6217fee1731a6da1e2cf94901a500842 changed the ordering of PACKAGES so that ${PN}-dev came before ${PN}. However, this caused the FILES matching to go wrong if ${libdir} == ${base_libdir}. Fix this by moving ${PN} ahead of ${PN}-dev once again. Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: Restore ${PN} to before ${PN}-dev in PACKAGES

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
Ah right, yeah, I guess so. Thanks, I'll re-send. Do we have any roadmap for getting to a point where we don't need to keep bumping PR by hand anymore? p. On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:09 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Missing PR bumps? On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] eglibc: Restore ${PN} to before ${PN}-dev in PACKAGES

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
Commit 13544fbc6217fee1731a6da1e2cf94901a500842 changed the ordering of PACKAGES so that ${PN}-dev came before ${PN}. However, this caused the FILES matching to go wrong if ${libdir} == ${base_libdir}. Fix this by moving ${PN} ahead of ${PN}-dev once again. Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] eglibc: Restore ${PN} to before ${PN}-dev in PACKAGES

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 11:14 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: Commit 13544fbc6217fee1731a6da1e2cf94901a500842 changed the ordering of PACKAGES so that ${PN}-dev came before ${PN}. However, this caused the FILES matching to go wrong if ${libdir} == ${base_libdir}. Fix this by moving ${PN} ahead of ${PN}-dev

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: From a gcc point of view both are the same ISA, but using xscale will take in account the absurdly long pipeline on that SoC. Not really, when you tune for XScale it will use ldrd/strd and pld if possible

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: From a gcc point of view both are the same ISA, but using xscale will take in account the absurdly long pipeline on that SoC. Not really, when you tune for

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED REQUEST 00/13] Misc Fixes (cover only)

2012-09-11 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 09/11/2012 09:14 AM, Saul Wold wrote: The following changes since commit 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7: classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists (2012-09-10 21:52:37 +0100)

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] autotools.bbclass: Add functionality to force a clean of ${B} when reconfiguring (and ${S} != ${B})

2012-09-11 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: Unfortunately whilst rerunning configure and make against a project will mostly work there are situations where it does not correctly do the right thing. In particular, eglibc and gcc will fail out with

[OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Scott Garman
Hello, In the Sato desktop, there is a virtual keyboard which you can bring up to enter text from a touchscreen interface. Once that keyboard pops up, how do you close it? I'm not seeing anything obvious. I'm helping out with a demo at a conference and could use this info urgently.

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Burton, Ross
On 11 September 2012 20:13, Scott Garman scott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote: In the Sato desktop, there is a virtual keyboard which you can bring up to enter text from a touchscreen interface. Once that keyboard pops up, how do you close it? I'm not seeing anything obvious. I'm helping out with a

[OE-core] [RFC 06/18] libx11: move keysymdefdir option to .inc

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb |2 -- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |4 +++- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.5.0.bb |

[OE-core] [RFC 01/18] libx11: use INC_PR

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |1 + meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.5.0.bb |

[OE-core] [RFC 12/18] default-providers: default to libx11, not -trim

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc index 2d8a17d..07222c2 100644

[OE-core] [RFC 05/18] libx11: move xcms disabling to PACKAGECONFIG in libx11.inc

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |6 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

[OE-core] [RFC 04/18] xorg-lib: move options to disable documentation to xorg-lib-common

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |4 +--- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxi_1.6.1.bb |4 +--- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/xorg-lib-common.inc |3 ++- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

[OE-core] [RFC 10/18] libx11: make bigfont an optional (disabled by default) packageconfig option

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |8 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc index 85fdbe7..d56aa23 100644 ---

[OE-core] [RFC 08/18] libx11: merge patches into a single directory

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- .../xorg-lib/libx11-1.5.0/keysymdef_include.patch | 23 - .../libx11-1.5.0/makekeys_crosscompile.patch | 76 --- .../libx11-1.5.0/x11_disable_makekeys.patch| 34 -- .../xorg-lib/libx11-diet-1.5.0/X18NCMSstubs.diff | 541

[OE-core] [RFC 15/18] libx11: drop makekeys_crosscompile.patch, effectively merged upstream

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- .../xorg-lib/libx11/makekeys_crosscompile.patch| 76 meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.5.0.bb |3 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 78 deletions(-) delete mode 100644

[OE-core] [RFC 07/18] libx11: remove redundant license data

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |2 -- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb |3 --- 2 files changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb

[OE-core] [RFC 11/18] libx11-diet: remove statements that are redundant

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |6 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb index

[OE-core] [RFC 03/18] libx11-diet: you can't disable UDC, because it's always disabled

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb index

[OE-core] [RFC 16/18] libx11: makekeys can be cross-compiled now, so don't hack around

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- .../recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |5 +-- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc | 43 ++-- .../xorg-lib/libx11/x11_disable_makekeys.patch | 34

[OE-core] [RFC 02/18] libx11-diet: you can't disable XCB anymore, so don't try

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb index

[OE-core] [RFC 14/18] distro-tracking: remove libx11-trim

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc |1 - meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc |1 - meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/recipe_color.inc |1 - 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Scott Garman
On 09/11/2012 12:16 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 11 September 2012 20:13, Scott Garman scott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote: In the Sato desktop, there is a virtual keyboard which you can bring up to enter text from a touchscreen interface. Once that keyboard pops up, how do you close it? I'm not

[OE-core] [RFC 09/18] libx11: refresh dependencies, and centralise into libx11.inc

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |3 --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb |2 -- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |5 - meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.5.0.bb

[OE-core] [RFC 18/18] libx11: revise keysymdef patch based on submission upstream

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- .../xorg-lib/libx11/keysymdef_include.patch| 38 meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.5.0.bb |2 +- 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [RFC 13/18] libx11-trim: remove, it's the same as libx11 now

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb | 15 --- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb diff --git

[OE-core] [RFC 17/18] libx11-diet: remove un-needed chunk from stubs patch

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- .../xorg-lib/libx11/X18NCMSstubs.diff | 20 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11/X18NCMSstubs.diff b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11/X18NCMSstubs.diff

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Burton, Ross
On 11 September 2012 20:19, Scott Garman scott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote: Negatory on both counts. Sounds like a bug? Certainly does. Not sure how that regressed or how QA didn't notice. So clicking on a button or check box doesn't make the keyboard hide? Eek. Ross

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Scott Garman
On 09/11/2012 12:23 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 11 September 2012 20:19, Scott Garman scott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote: Negatory on both counts. Sounds like a bug? Certainly does. Not sure how that regressed or how QA didn't notice. So clicking on a button or check box doesn't make the keyboard

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto/3.4: v3.4.10 and uprobes/kprobes configuration updates

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-09-11 09:33 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:27:50AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 08:37 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:31:42AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 02:59 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Bruce

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Khem Raj
On (11/09/12 19:53), Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: From a gcc point of view both are the same ISA, but using xscale will take in account the absurdly long pipeline on

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] udev: upgrade to 182

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/06/2012 02:27 AM, Alex DAMIAN wrote: From: Alexandru DAMIAN alexandru.dam...@intel.com This is the final upgrade of udev. Futher upgrades will only come in conjunction with systemd. The v4l1 removal patch is deprecated as the bug is fixed inside udev. There is a new patch fixing the path

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:36 -0700, Scott Garman wrote: On 09/11/2012 12:23 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 11 September 2012 20:19, Scott Garman scott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote: Negatory on both counts. Sounds like a bug? Certainly does. Not sure how that regressed or how QA didn't notice.

Re: [OE-core] /usr/bin/python is needed by git

2012-09-11 Thread Khem Raj
HI Mark, I sent a patch (see above) which added python as a dependency and that seemed to fix it. Whether or not this is the right fix I don't know... should git require the python binary to run? I really don't know much about it... I wonder what needs python in git. Can you inspect ?

  1   2   >