[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] runqemu: Explicitly specify MACHINE when calling bitbake

2012-09-12 Thread Khem Raj
When using runqemu with distros outside oe-core then MACHINE may not be there in local.conf so use the one thats available in environment of runqemu which is actually the correct one. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com --- scripts/runqemu |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

[OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/3] kernel.bbclass, module-base.bbclass: Use CC to form KERNEL_CC

2012-09-12 Thread Khem Raj
kernel compiler is not special and we currently have it so we want to pass -march and -mtune options as CFLAGS to kernel build so that compiler picks the right subarch flags when compiling assembly files in particular. Otherwise defaults are chosen which may not be right in many case e.g. when

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] uclibc: Revert systemd regressing patch from upsteam uclibc

2012-09-12 Thread Khem Raj
This patch is causing systemd based systemd to not boot Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com --- meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc-git.inc|5 +- ...nt.c-wtent.c-move-functions-from-utxent.c.patch | 321 2 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/3] kernel.bbclass, module-base.bbclass: Use CC to form KERNEL_CC

2012-09-12 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 22:59 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: kernel compiler is not special and we currently have it so we want to pass -march and -mtune options as CFLAGS to kernel build so that compiler picks the right subarch flags when compiling assembly files in particular. Historically, the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] uclibc: Revert systemd regressing patch from upsteam uclibc

2012-09-12 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 22:59 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: This patch is causing systemd based systemd to not boot Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com --- meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc-git.inc|5 +- ...nt.c-wtent.c-move-functions-from-utxent.c.patch | 321

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] eglibc: Restore ${PN} to before ${PN}-dev in PACKAGES

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 11:36 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:19 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 11:14 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: Commit 13544fbc6217fee1731a6da1e2cf94901a500842 changed the ordering of PACKAGES so that ${PN}-dev came before ${PN}. However, this caused the FILES

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] eglibc: Restore ${PN} to before ${PN}-dev in PACKAGES

2012-09-12 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 00:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 11:36 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:19 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 11:14 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: Commit 13544fbc6217fee1731a6da1e2cf94901a500842 changed the ordering of PACKAGES so that

[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED REQUEST v2 00/35] Misc Fixes (CV Only)

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
Richard, This contains various fixes from teh community along with a few updates. The Kernel update seems to have trigged a mpc8315 failure, but I am sure Bruce will deal with it quickly. This also include Bruce and my change that now allows us to elimate the x32 layer and by setting the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/3] kernel.bbclass, module-base.bbclass: Use CC to form KERNEL_CC

2012-09-12 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 22:59 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: kernel compiler is not special and we currently have it so we want to pass -march and -mtune options as CFLAGS to kernel build so that compiler picks the right subarch flags

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] uclibc: Revert systemd regressing patch from upsteam uclibc

2012-09-12 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org wrote: Why are you changing SRCREV as well? Well I forgot to mention is in commit about SRCREV bump. I have tested the revert on top of the proposed SRCREV I will send a V2 with more details in commit log

[OE-core] [PATCH V2 3/3] uclibc: Revert systemd regressing patch from upsteam uclibc and uprev SRCREV

2012-09-12 Thread Khem Raj
This patch is causing systemd based systemd to not boot Revert of patch has been tested on tip of master hence the new SRCREV New SRCREV brings in one another regression fix as described here http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2012-August/046993.html Signed-off-by: Khem Raj

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core] valgrind: fix debug info reading error when do memcheck on ppc targets

2012-09-12 Thread Luo Zhenhua-B19537
-Original Message- From: McClintock Matthew-B29882 Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 12:03 PM diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind-3.7.0/valgrind-3.7.0-fix-err or-of-reading-debug-info.patch

[OE-core] [oe-core v2] valgrind: fix debug info reading error when do memcheck on ppc targets

2012-09-12 Thread b19537
From: Zhenhua Luo b19...@freescale.com following is the error message: --2263-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info --2263-- When reading debug info from /lib/ld-2.13.so: --2263-- Can't make sense of .got section mapping --2263-- WARNING: Serious

[OE-core] Bug: LDFLAGS is not cleared for kernel devshell

2012-09-12 Thread Björn Stenberg
Hi. I couldn't figure out where to properly patch this, so I'll just raise the issue: LDFLAGS is configured in bitbake.conf as linker flags to be passed to gcc, not to ld. Hence it uses the -Wl prefix. The linux kernel build system inherits LDFLAGS from the environment and passes it directly

[OE-core] Feature Developement vs. Stablisation and Bug fixing

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi, I know in the past this has taken some people by surprise. Both OE-Core and the Yocto Project are aiming at release points every six months, roughly October and April. In order to prepare for those there is a period of 6-8 weeks beforehand which is aimed at stabilisation and bug fixing. We

Re: [OE-core] Feature Developement vs. Stablisation and Bug fixing

2012-09-12 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:15:16AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: Hi, I know in the past this has taken some people by surprise. Both OE-Core and the Yocto Project are aiming at release points every six months, roughly October and April. In order to prepare for those there is a period of 6-8

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] mesa-dri: remove DEFAULT_PREFERENCE, this is the preferred now

2012-09-12 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri.inc |3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri.inc b/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri.inc index 7a1164b..2d5aa44 100644 ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] mesa-xlib: remove, it serves no useful purpose

2012-09-12 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-xlib.inc |1 - meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-xlib_8.0.4.bb |5 - meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-xlib_git.bb |8 3 files changed, 14 deletions(-) delete mode 100644

Re: [OE-core] [RFC 13/18] libx11-trim: remove, it's the same as libx11 now

2012-09-12 Thread Burton, Ross
This is the only patch in the series that isn't ready for merging as far as I'm concerned. Are there sufficient users of libx11-trim on non-debian-renaming systems that use package feeds to add conflicts/replaces for this? Ross ___ Openembedded-core

[OE-core] fstab

2012-09-12 Thread Jaap de Jong
Hi All, I've created my own /etc/fstab which is perfectly included in base-files_*.ipk as expected. It also shows up in build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/mymachine/myimage*/rootfs/etc But I find a different version of /etc/fstab under

Re: [OE-core] fstab

2012-09-12 Thread Jaap de Jong
Sorry Already solved. My bad !!! On 09/12/2012 01:48 PM, Jaap de Jong wrote: Hi All, I've created my own /etc/fstab which is perfectly included in base-files_*.ipk as expected. It also shows up in build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/mymachine/myimage*/rootfs/etc But I find a different

Re: [OE-core] Feature Developement vs. Stablisation and Bug fixing

2012-09-12 Thread Vladimir Zapolskiy
Hi Richard, On 12.09.2012 13:15, Richard Purdie wrote: Hi, I know in the past this has taken some people by surprise. Both OE-Core and the Yocto Project are aiming at release points every six months, roughly October and April. In order to prepare for those there is a period of 6-8 weeks

Re: [OE-core] Feature Developement vs. Stablisation and Bug fixing

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 14:52 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: Hi Richard, On 12.09.2012 13:15, Richard Purdie wrote: Hi, I know in the past this has taken some people by surprise. Both OE-Core and the Yocto Project are aiming at release points every six months, roughly October and

Re: [OE-core] Feature Developement vs. Stablisation and Bug fixing

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 12:25 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:15:16AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: Hi, I know in the past this has taken some people by surprise. Both OE-Core and the Yocto Project are aiming at release points every six months, roughly October and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 09:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: When

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gst-plugins-good: fix compile error with recent linux-libc-headers

2012-09-12 Thread Andreas Müller
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote: With linux-libc-headers-3.5.0 (for tests) the error message was: | gstv4l2bufferpool.c: In function 'gst_v4l2_buffer_new': | gstv4l2bufferpool.c:184:3: error: 'struct v4l2_buffer' has no member named 'input'

[OE-core] [PATCH] patch.bbclass: Use one TMPDIR per patching process

2012-09-12 Thread Constantin Musca
We must use one TMPDIR per process (/tmp/${PID}) so that the patching processes don't generate the same temp file name (the patch program uses the TMPDIR environment variable for deciding where to create the temp files). [YOCTO #3070] Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca constantinx.mu...@intel.com

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 09:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On

[OE-core] [PATCH] cml1.bbclass: fix kernel menuconfig

2012-09-12 Thread Andreas Müller
At some host environments the menuconfig displayed wrong characters ang turned unusable. Similar suggested in [1] [1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-August/027130.html Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com --- meta/classes/cml1.bbclass |2

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cml1.bbclass: fix kernel menuconfig

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 15:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: At some host environments the menuconfig displayed wrong characters ang turned unusable. Similar suggested in [1] [1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-August/027130.html Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller

Re: [OE-core] Bug: LDFLAGS is not cleared for kernel devshell

2012-09-12 Thread Chris Larson
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Björn Stenberg b...@enea.com wrote: I couldn't figure out where to properly patch this, so I'll just raise the issue: LDFLAGS is configured in bitbake.conf as linker flags to be passed to gcc, not to ld. Hence it uses the -Wl prefix. The linux kernel build

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cml1.bbclass: fix kernel menuconfig

2012-09-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 15:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: At some host environments the menuconfig displayed wrong characters ang turned unusable. Similar suggested in [1] [1]

[OE-core] [PATCH] kernel: remove unused 'etc' directory

2012-09-12 Thread Mark Asselstine
Along with checks to remove empty modprobe.d and modules-load.d directories we can add a similar check and removal of the etc directory. This will avoid warnings by the sanity checker. Signed-off-by: Mark Asselstine mark.asselst...@windriver.com CC: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com ---

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 08:58 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 09:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold

Re: [OE-core] [RFC 13/18] libx11-trim: remove, it's the same as libx11 now

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 12:46 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: This is the only patch in the series that isn't ready for merging as far as I'm concerned. Are there sufficient users of libx11-trim on non-debian-renaming systems that use package feeds to add conflicts/replaces for this? I don't think

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gst-plugins-good: fix compile error with recent linux-libc-headers

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 14:27 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote: With linux-libc-headers-3.5.0 (for tests) the error message was: | gstv4l2bufferpool.c: In function 'gst_v4l2_buffer_new': |

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] quota 4.00: add DEPENDS gettext-native

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 16:38 +0800, jackie.hu...@windriver.com wrote: From: Jackie Huang jackie.hu...@windriver.com do_install needs command 'msgfmt', it would fail if the command doesn't exist on the host, add DEPENDS gettext-native to fix this. [YOCTO #2811] Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED REQUEST v2 00/35] Misc Fixes (CV Only)

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 00:23 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: This contains various fixes from teh community along with a few updates. The Kernel update seems to have trigged a mpc8315 failure, but I am sure Bruce will deal with it quickly. This also include Bruce and my change that now allows us

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] gcc: Switch SRC_URI to use svn

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:44 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2012-09-05 22:35, Khem Raj wrote: svn tar balls are 96M as compared to 1.3G git tars its unnessary to suck in that much of data. Fixes [YOCTO #2908] Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com What about this patch? Carrying

[OE-core] libx11-diet removal

2012-09-12 Thread Burton, Ross
On 12 September 2012 14:59, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: I don't think there are many such users so I've merged the series. We've had this mess around for a long time, keep talking about fixing and now someone gives me a patch series so I really just can't resist ;-)

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] autotools.bbclass: Add functionality to force a clean of ${B} when reconfiguring (and ${S} != ${B})

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 19:01 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: Unfortunately whilst rerunning configure and make against a project will mostly work there are situations where it does not

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 15:01 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Hi, when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) resulting packages are tuned with -mtune=xscale (when built for spitz) or -mtune=arm926ej-s (when built for qemuarm). From

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Enhancement / bug fixes to the complementary install

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/07/2012 03:05 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: This is one bug fix and one enhancement to the complementary install. We have a use where we would like to call the complementary install directly with a set of parameters, the enhancement allows us to do this. The bug fix is specific to the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V4] base-files: provide a mechanism to skip creation of the hostname file

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/08/2012 06:42 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: From: Mark Asselstine mark.asselst...@windriver.com The existence of a /etc/hostname file causes any hostname provided on the kernel command line or via dhcp to be overwritten by the initscripts 'init.d/hostname.sh'. This change allows you to set a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Minor fix to qt4 -dbg packages

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/07/2012 03:07 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: The following changes since commit 0de1827a9601143b090f751ea702fdb65a936b77: classes/mirrors: remove bogus gnutls mirror (2012-09-07 14:51:10 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib mhatle/qt4

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] perl-native: PROVIDE libmodule-build-perl-native for consistency with non-native perl

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/09/2012 02:13 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: This module is, apparently, included in the standard perl distribution since 5.10.1 or so. The regular perl recipe has had this PROVIDES for a while but it seems to have been overlooked in the native version. Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] telepathy-idle: fix parallel build

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/10/2012 05:49 AM, Ross Burton wrote: Apply a patch from upstream git, and clean up our other patch so that it applies. [ YOCTO #3056 ] Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- .../build-fix-for-make-j-safety.patch | 39

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] gettext: Make gettext 0.16.1 extend native and nativesdk.

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 01:30 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: gettext 0.16.1 is a GPLv2 version of gettext. Making that extend native and nativesdk makes sure we use the same version of gettext for compiling internally as well as in our toolchain. Signed-off-by: Martin Ertsaas mert...@cisco.com ---

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] webkit-gtk: work around Make bug by re-running make

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/10/2012 09:02 AM, Ross Burton wrote: GNU make 3.82 has a bug where it drops required dependencies. https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79498 is the WebKitGTK+ bug, and http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30653 is the GNU Make bug. Work around this by running make again if it fails just in

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] A couple of fixes for sanity.bbclass

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 02:40 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: The following changes since commit 9f0453c29891e32f8038c4bbc22ada28bfbf818a: lib/oe/sstatesig.py: add signature data query function (2012-09-10 13:03:45 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix nativesdk-qemu relocation issue

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 06:55 AM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: Changes in V2: - bump PR Thanks, Laurentiu The following changes since commit 7250638ec895bc89508711831083d43b9e1e9826: upstream_tracking: Fix format issues (2012-09-10 23:21:12 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] libgnome-keyring: add missing DEPENDS on intltool-native

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 08:13 AM, jackie.hu...@windriver.com wrote: From: Jackie Huang jackie.hu...@windriver.com The following changes since commit 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7: classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists (2012-09-10 21:52:37 +0100) are available

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf.bb: only run serial checks at boot if we have items to check

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 10:56 AM, Matthew McClintock wrote: Right now, we delay running the serial console checks to we boot up. This causes issues for read only file systems. So, if have not configured any serial ports to check via SERIAL_CONSOLES_CHECK we can skip the check at boot. This fixes any

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] eglibc: Restore ${PN} to before ${PN}-dev in PACKAGES

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 11:14 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: Commit 13544fbc6217fee1731a6da1e2cf94901a500842 changed the ordering of PACKAGES so that ${PN}-dev came before ${PN}. However, this caused the FILES matching to go wrong if ${libdir} == ${base_libdir}. Fix this by moving ${PN} ahead of ${PN}-dev

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core v2] valgrind: fix debug info reading error when do memcheck on ppc targets

2012-09-12 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:20 AM, b19...@freescale.com wrote: From: Zhenhua Luo b19...@freescale.com following is the error message: --2263-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info --2263-- When reading debug info from /lib/ld-2.13.so: --2263-- Can't make

[OE-core] [for-denzil] eglibc_2.15: make patch only for Freescale machines

2012-09-12 Thread Matthew McClintock
It's only Freescale machines that don't imlpement fsqrt, we don't want this to effect others. This patch was only added after the last release of denzil, so it's not present in the release yet. Also, 2.15 is removed from master so it should only apply to denzil branch Signed-off-by: Matthew

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/10/2012 05:58 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: Instead of using a rather error-prone method of looking for output package files in order to determine if a package got created, use the .packaged file within pkgdata. This fixes two separate issues: * Some packages apparently not being found by this

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] autotools.bbclass: Add functionality to force a clean of ${B} when reconfiguring (and ${S} != ${B})

2012-09-12 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 19:01 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: Unfortunately whilst rerunning configure and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] classes/license: various bugfixes and improvements

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/10/2012 06:13 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: This trivial set of changes fixes several bugs including: * check license.manifest for multiple records about the same * put precise information about licensing into license.manifest * specify licensing of packages, where info is in form of

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1 V2] package_rpm.bbclass: fix the arch (replace - with _)

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/10/2012 12:58 AM, Robert Yang wrote: Changes of V2: * Replace - with _ for sat-solver_git.bb Test info: MACHINE = beagleboard/mpc8315e-rdb/qemux86 PACKAGE_CLASSES = package_rpm $ bitbake core-image-minimal core-image-sato meta-toolchain \ meta-toolchain-sdk adt-installer

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] Package upgrades

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 08:19 AM, Constantin Musca wrote: This is another set of package upgrades compiled on all architectures and tested using core-image-sato. The following changes since commit 7250638ec895bc89508711831083d43b9e1e9826: upstream_tracking: Fix format issues (2012-09-10 23:21:12

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] recipes-rt: Update rt-tests, hwlatdetect, and core-image-rt images

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 09:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote: These changes have been tested on the meta-intel sys940x BSP. cyclictest and hwlatdetect run successfully. The following changes since commit 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7: classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] mesa-xlib: remove, it serves no useful purpose

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/12/2012 03:23 AM, Ross Burton wrote: Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-xlib.inc |1 - meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-xlib_8.0.4.bb |5 - meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-xlib_git.bb |8 3 files changed,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gst-plugins-good: fix compile error with recent linux-libc-headers

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/05/2012 10:50 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: With linux-libc-headers-3.5.0 (for tests) the error message was: | gstv4l2bufferpool.c: In function 'gst_v4l2_buffer_new': | gstv4l2bufferpool.c:184:3: error: 'struct v4l2_buffer' has no member named 'input' Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core v2] valgrind: fix debug info reading error when do memcheck on ppc targets

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/12/2012 01:20 AM, b19...@freescale.com wrote: From: Zhenhua Luo b19...@freescale.com following is the error message: --2263-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info --2263-- When reading debug info from /lib/ld-2.13.so: --2263-- Can't make sense of

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] kernel: remove unused 'etc' directory

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
I assume this patch is for Denzil? It seems that the current OE-Core master has etc in that list. Please confirm Sau! On 09/12/2012 06:41 AM, Mark Asselstine wrote: Along with checks to remove empty modprobe.d and modules-load.d directories we can add a similar check and removal of the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] kernel: remove unused 'etc' directory

2012-09-12 Thread Mark Asselstine
On September 12, 2012 11:20:05 Saul Wold wrote: I assume this patch is for Denzil? It seems that the current OE-Core master has etc in that list. Please confirm Sau! Saul, Sorry I got mixed up on my branches there and didn't notice your change, thanks for straightening me out. Scott

[OE-core] [PATCH V2 0/1] image_types.bbclass: Round up ROOTFS_SIZE after base_size check

2012-09-12 Thread Andrei Gherzan
V2: Replace expr with awk. In this way an error like expr: non-integer argument is avoided. The following changes since commit 0f55a5868457300a3defc7fa7451ef191d19e018: adt-installer: Allow changing YOCTOADT_REPO (2012-09-05 23:28:10 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

[OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/1] image_types.bbclass: Round up ROOTFS_SIZE after base_size check

2012-09-12 Thread Andrei Gherzan
If we round up ROOTFS_SIZE to IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT before checking if base_size is greater then IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE, we can end up adding an unaligned value to IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE. Obviously, if IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE was overwritten with an unaligned value. So let's add the round up code after

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/1] image_types.bbclass: Round up ROOTFS_SIZE after base_size check

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/12/2012 01:10 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: If we round up ROOTFS_SIZE to IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT before checking if base_size is greater then IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE, we can end up adding an unaligned value to IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE. Obviously, if IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE was overwritten with an

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core v2] valgrind: fix debug info reading error when do memcheck on ppc targets

2012-09-12 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:20 AM, b19...@freescale.com wrote: From: Zhenhua Luo b19...@freescale.com following is the error message: --2263-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info --2263-- When reading debug info from /lib/ld-2.13.so: --2263-- Can't make

[OE-core] [PATCH] valgrind_3.7.0.bb: fix missing leading space on _append

2012-09-12 Thread Matthew McClintock
Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock m...@freescale.com --- meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.7.0.bb |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.7.0.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.7.0.bb index

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] runqemu: Explicitly specify MACHINE when calling bitbake

2012-09-12 Thread Scott Garman
On 09/11/2012 10:59 PM, Khem Raj wrote: When using runqemu with distros outside oe-core then MACHINE may not be there in local.conf so use the one thats available in environment of runqemu which is actually the correct one. Looks simple enough. Acked-by: Scott Garman scott.a.gar...@intel.com

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/1] image_types.bbclass: Round up ROOTFS_SIZE after base_size check

2012-09-12 Thread Andrei Gherzan
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 09/12/2012 01:10 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: If we round up ROOTFS_SIZE to IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT before checking if base_size is greater then IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE, we can end up adding an unaligned value to

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] insane.conf: add new libexec test

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/12/2012 06:01 PM, Saul Wold wrote: This tests for /usr/libexec as we are moving things to /lib/. This got clobbered by the shell or something, should be ${prefix}/lib/${BPN} the test is ignored if the distro defaults to /usr/libexec. Currently this test will be disabled by default

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] insane.conf: add new libexec test

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/12/2012 06:01 PM, Saul Wold wrote: This tests for /usr/libexec as we are moving things to /lib/. the test is ignored if the distro defaults to /usr/libexec. Currently this test will be disabled by default since the current value of ${libexecdir} is /usr/libexec. Also this tests needs to

[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED REQUEST 00/10] Misc Fixes (cover only)

2012-09-12 Thread Saul Wold
Richard, A few fixes from people. I have the start of the libexec sanity (insane test) and a couple of fixes for miss-packaged files. Sau! The following changes since commit 835654994574c158d6324218ebe000bd2ef9a792: rt: Add hwlatdetect to rt images (2012-09-12 15:11:12 +0100) are available