Re: [OE-core] Why do we allow empty -dev/-dbg packages ?

2014-01-01 Thread ChenQi
On 12/31/2013 05:45 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 09:49:21AM +0800, ChenQi wrote: Hi All, This might be a dummy question, but it has been puzzling me for some time. So if someone could give me some explanation, that would be really appreciated. In bitbake.conf, we have: ALLOW

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] coreutils: upgrade to 8.22

2014-01-01 Thread Chen Qi
Upgrade coreutils to 8.22. Changes since 8.21: 1) Remove the acl patch as it's not needed now. 2) Add a new patch to fix the following compile error. "dummy-man: too many non-option arguments" Signed-off-by: Chen Qi --- .../coreutils-8.21/coreutils-build-with-acl.patch | 28 --

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] coreutils: upgrade to 8.22

2014-01-01 Thread Chen Qi
The following changes since commit 005af45191ded6185c618c708181b31281e43092: bitbake: fetch2: avoid printing "no checksum" error message twice (2013-12-22 14:29:13 +) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib ChenQi/coreutils-8.22 http://git.pokylinu

[OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/2] initscripts: split the functions script into a separate package

2014-01-01 Thread Chen Qi
Many SysV init scripts need the /etc/init.d/functions script. But this script is part of the initscripts package. As a result, the initscripts package should always be installed into the system to avoid errors when starting daemons. However, it makes no sense to install the initscripts package into

[OE-core] [PATCH V2 2/2] Add missing RDEPENDS of initscripts-functions

2014-01-01 Thread Chen Qi
Now that the initscripts-functions has been packaged separately, packages which may use the functions script should have a runtime dependency on it. Signed-off-by: Chen Qi --- meta/recipes-bsp/alsa-state/alsa-state.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-bsp/apmd/apmd_3.2.2-14.bb |1

[OE-core] [PATCH V2 0/2] Split the functions script into a separate package in initscripts

2014-01-01 Thread Chen Qi
Changes since V1: 1. Add initscripts-functions to the REPENDS of the packages that need it instead of always intalling it. //Chen Qi The following changes since commit 005af45191ded6185c618c708181b31281e43092: bitbake: fetch2: avoid printing "no checksum" error message twice (2013-12-22 14:

[OE-core] Call for demos

2014-01-01 Thread Philip Balister
I was thinking about demos for FOSDEM (thanks to the people that have already offered some) and realized I should reach out to the broader community. OpenEmbedded has a stand (table) at FOSDEM to show of the project to the oen source community. Typically, whoever comes to FOSDEM brings whatever co

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] pulseaudio: rescale input being passed to float method of speex

2014-01-01 Thread Arslan, Fahad
Pulseaudio upstream says that this patch breaks speex-float if it isn't compiled with FIXED_POINT defined, which is valid concern. So what is the best option now to avoid the no sound issue: a. replace --enable-fixed-point and --disable-float-api with --enable-float-api in Speex's recipe b. repl

[OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks Wed Jan

2014-01-01 Thread Martin Jansa
I'll take care of fetch issues in meta-oe git recipes http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status == Failed tasks Wed Jan 1 11:45:17 UTC 2014 == === common (21) === * meta-openembedded/meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/evas_1.7.9.bb, do_compile * meta-openembedded/meta-multimedia/reci