Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3][fido][dizzy] D-Bus policy fixes

2015-10-01 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
On 30 September 2015 at 18:33, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > bluez5: Use upstream D-Bus policy > dbus: Use the xuser policy file > xuser-account: Take over xuser specific D-Bus policy > Please don't take the last two patches yet: I believe dbus itself does not actually have to be modified and th

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] smart: speed up installation (reduce 28% ~ 57%)

2015-10-01 Thread Robert Yang
Here is the test result: MACHINE = "qemux86-64" - When multilib enabled: $ bitbake core-image-sato -cpopulate_sdk time: 6m5s -> 2m34s (Reduce 57% ) $ bitbake core-image-minimal -cpopulate_sdk time: 2m1s -> 1m26s (Reduce 28% ) $ bitbake core-image-sato-sdk time: 10m15s

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] smart:cache.py: getPackages() matches name + arch

2015-10-01 Thread Robert Yang
It only matched name ony in the past, for example: smart install busybox (matched) but: smart install busybox@core2_64 (didn't match) The installation is very slow when no match since it would seach all the packages in the repo, and what we use mostly in oe-core is the second case, so the installa

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] smart:cache.py: getPackages() matches name + arch

2015-10-01 Thread Robert Yang
On 10/01/2015 03:40 PM, Robert Yang wrote: It only matched name ony in the past, for example: smart install busybox (matched) but: smart install busybox@core2_64 (didn't match) The installation is very slow when no match since it would seach all the packages in the repo, and what we use mostly

[OE-core] [PATCHv2 0/2][fido][dizzy] D-Bus policy fixes

2015-10-01 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
Changes since v1: - move the xuser policy file to {sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/ as it works just fine from there. original cover letter follows: The major patch in the series is the bluez one: Bluez D-Bus policy was incorrectly written so it actually allowed access to system services _other

[OE-core] [PATCHv2 2/2] xuser-account: Take over xuser specific D-Bus policy

2015-10-01 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
Move connmans xuser-related D-Bus policy to a separate file that xuser-account installs: This way connman does not need to depend on xuser-account. Add policies for bluez and ofono in the same file. Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen --- meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc | 1 - .../

[OE-core] [PATCHv2 1/2] bluez5: Use upstream D-Bus policy

2015-10-01 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
The Bluez D-Bus policy is much too open and affects not just bluez but all system services: Use upstream policy configuration instead. This change has a chance of affecting other D-Bus services: the bug that is fixed here may have hidden problems in other policies. [YOCTO #8414] Signed-off-by: J

[OE-core] [meta-java] [PATCH] openjdk-8: fix TUNE_CCARGS on intel-core2-32/i686

2015-10-01 Thread Patrick Ohly
A machine-independent recipe must not have machine-specific changes, as in TUNE_CCARGS_append_intel-core2-32. In the best case, that only causes unnecessary rebuilds when switching machines with the same CPU which otherwise could share sstate. In the worst case, it confuses PR server and build hist

[OE-core] [PATCH] devtool: modify: use correct local files directory name

2015-10-01 Thread Markus Lehtonen
The name of the directory for local source files under srctree is 'oe-local-files', not 'local-files'. Fixes a bug that slipped through in b7ab82485e4514e07ab8a76e554da27ddc92e6c0. Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen --- scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deleti

[OE-core] [PATCH] qemu: Drop BROKEN usage

2015-10-01 Thread Richard Purdie
BROKEN support was removed from bitbake back in 2013. These lines just increase parsing time, remove them. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc index 738bf2b..bbfdf78 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc

[OE-core] [PATCH] Revert "oeqa/runtime: Added one runtime testcase in connman."

2015-10-01 Thread Cristian Iorga
connman daemon forks during normal usage, so this test is no longer valid and generates sometimes false positives. This reverts commit 7d01c595c96eb3d67b90caf71050c4e9345257de. --- meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py | 23 --- 1 file changed, 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/li

[OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/2] webkitgtk: Use ON/OFF for cmake switches.

2015-10-01 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
* This is a cosmetic patch. * Using ON/OFF instead of True/False is exactly the same for cmake (is case insensitive). * But WebKitGTK+ preffers (and uses) the first option. So when you check which values were enabled for the build (at log.do_configure) you will see that every op

[OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 0/2] webkitgtk: Add some packageconfig options.

2015-10-01 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
* This adds some useful packageconfig options to the webkitgtk recipe. * It switches also the CMake switches to ON/OFF (cosmetic) Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez (2): webkitgtk: Use ON/OFF for cmake switches. webkitgtk: Add some PACKAGECONFIG options. meta/recipes-sato/webkit/webkitgtk_2.8.5.

[OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 2/2] webkitgtk: Add some PACKAGECONFIG options.

2015-10-01 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
* Also default to enable X11/Wayland support or WebGL according to enabled DISTRO_FEATURES. Signed-off-by: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez --- meta/recipes-sato/webkit/webkitgtk_2.8.5.bb | 15 +-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-sato/webkit/

[OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Richard Purdie
Just a heads up for people that we've branched for release and that jethro branches are now available. Bitbake branched as 1.28, I decided to save bitbake 2.0 for another occasion. These branches are going to track master for a while yet as we stabilise the release. Cheers, Richard --

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > Just a heads up for people that we've branched for release and that > jethro branches are now available. Bitbake branched as 1.28, I decided > to save bitbake 2.0 for another occasion. what would be the occasion ? this time lets branch consi

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: >> Just a heads up for people that we've branched for release and that >> jethro branches are now available. Bitbake branched as 1.28, I decided >> to save bitbake 2.0 for another occasion.

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 01/10/15 16:28, Khem Raj wrote: > I would also suggest to not use codenames in branches > but rather the numbered release. If we want to use codenames for > branches then lets drop the numbered release names. > I suggest using both (codename+release_number). Ex: jethro-2.0 or 2.0-jethro (pro

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > On 01/10/15 16:28, Khem Raj wrote: >> I would also suggest to not use codenames in branches >> but rather the numbered release. If we want to use codenames for >> branches then lets drop the numbered release names. >> > > I sugges

[OE-core] [PATCH] distro-alias.inc: Updated for jethro 2.0 release

2015-10-01 Thread Beth Flanagan
Updates for distro_alias.inc. This should be pulled for jethro and master branches. Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan --- meta/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/dis

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 07:28 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > Just a heads up for people that we've branched for release and that > > jethro branches are now available. Bitbake branched as 1.28, I decided > > to save bitbake 2.0 for another occasi

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 11:41 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I agree. > > The mix between codenames and version numbers cause a lot of confusion > for outsiders. We, involved with the project development can handle it > (even though sometimes I ask myself if one codename is older or newer > than an

[OE-core] [PATCH] ThunderX: Add initial tune file

2015-10-01 Thread Armin Kuster
From: Armin Kuster Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta/conf/machine/include/tune-thunderX.inc | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/conf/machine/include/tune-thunderX.inc diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-thunderX.inc b/meta/conf/machin

[OE-core] [PATCH] systemd: remove glib-2.0 build dependency

2015-10-01 Thread Ross Burton
This dependency isn't required now that systemd doesn't include gudev, so remove it. [ YOCTO #8398 ] Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_225.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_225.bb b/meta/recip

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Khem Raj
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 8:37 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 07:28 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Richard Purdie >> wrote: >>> Just a heads up for people that we've branched for release and that >>> jethro branches are now available. Bitbake branch

[OE-core] [PATCH] "Finish" the IMAGE_GEN_DEBUGFS implementation

2015-10-01 Thread Mark Hatle
It was noticed today that the IMAGE_GEN_DEBUGFS implementation was not complete. The version that was merged back in May only contained the filesystem generation pieces, but not the pieces for creating the image from that filesystem. The code has been tested and is working. The only thing that

[OE-core] [PATCH] lib/oe/image.py: Add image generation for companion debug filesystem

2015-10-01 Thread Mark Hatle
The companion debug filesystem, enabled with IMAGE_GEN_DEBUGFS, was creating the companion filesystem but was missing the code to actually package it into a usable filesystem. The code (and associated documentation) will allow the debugfs to generate a companion tarball or other image. Signed-off

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Unicode support for Report Error and Qemu

2015-10-01 Thread mariano . lopez
From: Mariano Lopez These two patches add Unicode support for the report error bbclass and the qemu bootlog. [YOCTO #8225] The following changes since commit eac61f37e36099f74485dab398b57f3812826d17: build-appliance-image: Update to jethro head revision (2015-10-01 17:55:11 +0100) are ava

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] report-error.bbclass: Support Unicode reports

2015-10-01 Thread mariano . lopez
From: Mariano Lopez Currently error-report doesn't manage Unicode because the files are opened with the default codec. This patch changes the codec of the files to UTF-8, this way the reports will include Unicode characters. This is useful for the qemu output when doing the testimage task. [YOC

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] oeqa/utils/qemurunner: Add support for Unicode from qemu

2015-10-01 Thread mariano . lopez
From: Mariano Lopez The current state of qemurunner will drop the Unicode characters received from qemu, this is because error report web had problems with Unicode characters; now that the server support Unicode, it is possible to log all the output from qemu. So far the only Unicode character se

Re: [OE-core] Sorting rootfs manifest with .ipk packaging

2015-10-01 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Sep 30, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> >> I'd like the rootfs manifest to be sorted when using .ipk packaging. >> Would a patch to sort the result of OpkgPkgsList().list be acceptable? >> Or would the sorting be better done elsew

Re: [OE-core] Sorting rootfs manifest with .ipk packaging

2015-10-01 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >>> On Sep 30, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> >>> I'd like the rootfs manifest to be sorted when using .ipk packaging. >>> Would a patch to sort the result of OpkgPkgsList().lis

Re: [OE-core] Sorting rootfs manifest with .ipk packaging

2015-10-01 Thread Christopher Larson
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Otavio Salvador < otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> > >>> On Sep 30, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Andre McCurdy > wrote: > >>> > >>> I'd like the rootfs

[OE-core] PIXBUFCACHE_SYSROOT_DEPS (librsvg)

2015-10-01 Thread Slater, Joseph
This variable is used by librsvg_2.40.10.bb, but I can't find anybody who processes it, at least not a bbclass. Without adding an explicit do_populate_sysroot_setscene[depends] to the recipe, gdk-pixbuf-native will install from sstate after librsvg-native and clobber the svg loader. At least i

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 10:24 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > If we want to discuss this all again, so be it, but on the eve of > > release really isn't the time to start it all again. > > so when is the right time ? Do we have long enough pre-notice about > when we the branching is going to happen? We

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] gma500_gfx: Avoid inserting gma500_gfx module for certain devices

2015-10-01 Thread Alejandro Hernandez
The gma500_gfx driver will match certain devices on which it causes incorrect functionality, we want to avoid inserting this module, basicallly blacklist it for specific hardware, but still allow it to work on other hardware by default; usually when we have an already working system, using udev

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> so when is the right time ? Do we have long enough pre-notice about >> when we the branching is going to happen? > > We release approximately in April and October with a six month cadence. > > After the complaints about communication, there

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 10:24 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> > If we want to discuss this all again, so be it, but on the eve of >> > release really isn't the time to start it all again. >> >> so when is the right time ? Do we have long enough pre-n

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 17:30 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I think what Khem means is that any time is time to discuss the > release process as this is a community driven project and we must to > be open for feedback and revisit our previous concepts. There is a time and a place for such discussi

[OE-core] [PATCH] Revert "qemu-native: Enable temporary debug info as default."

2015-10-01 Thread Aníbal Limón
We enabled qemu-native debug builds for debug [YOCTO #8143] now is fixed and we don't need it for release. This reverts commit 1fa9a0cc6e4c80a5a2bf40331390ae9da71686c2. Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón --- meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta

[OE-core] [PATCH] linux-yocto: Update SRCREV for genericx86* BSPs

2015-10-01 Thread Saul Wold
This update brings the kernel for genericx86* up to date with the linux-yocto kernel and 4.1.8 Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- meta-yocto-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.1.bbappend | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-yocto-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/lin

Re: [OE-core] PIXBUFCACHE_SYSROOT_DEPS (librsvg)

2015-10-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 19:24 +, Slater, Joseph wrote: > This variable is used by librsvg_2.40.10.bb, but I can't find anybody > who processes it, at least not a bbclass. > > > > Without adding an explicit do_populate_sysroot_setscene[depends] to > the recipe, gdk-pixbuf-native > > will inst

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] "Finish" the IMAGE_GEN_DEBUGFS implementation

2015-10-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 13:26 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > It was noticed today that the IMAGE_GEN_DEBUGFS implementation was not > complete. The version that was merged back in May only contained the > filesystem generation pieces, but not the pieces for creating the image > from that filesystem. >

[OE-core] [PATCH] package_manager.py: sort output of OpkgPkgsList().list

2015-10-01 Thread Andre McCurdy
Without explicit sorting, the output generated by OpkgPkgsList().list follows the order of packages in /var/lib/opkg/status, which appears to be "random". Add sorting to make OpkgPkgsList().list behaviour consistent with that of RpmPkgsList().list. Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy --- meta/lib/oe/pa

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Richard Purdie > wrote: >>> so when is the right time ? Do we have long enough pre-notice about >>> when we the branching is going to happen? >> >> We release approximately in April and October with a six month cade

Re: [OE-core] Branched for release

2015-10-01 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 17:30 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> I think what Khem means is that any time is time to discuss the >> release process as this is a community driven project and we must to >> be open for feedback and revisit our previ

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] ThunderX: Add initial tune file

2015-10-01 Thread Khem Raj
Armin can we get rid of uppercase X > On Oct 1, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Armin Kuster wrote: > > From: Armin Kuster > > Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster > --- > meta/conf/machine/include/tune-thunderX.inc | 19 +++ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 meta/conf/machine/