Would it make sense, would it be possible, for the qemuarm machine to
emulate ARMv7a instead of ARMv5?
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
musl doesnt implement error() API, hence provide one
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../util-linux/uuid-test-error-api.patch | 92 ++
meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.27.1.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-core/uti
This helps packages like gnutls to compile with musl
any package that needs glibc's implementation of argp
can link to this library
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../argp-standalone/argp-standalone_1.3.bb | 28
.../files/0001-throw-in-funcdef.patch | 84 ++
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls.inc | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls.inc
b/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls.inc
index c1ec120..5bcfc9c 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-s
inb/outb are implemented for ARM on glibc but not on linux in general
therefore the conditional has to reflect that
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg/musl-arm-inb-outb.patch | 18 ++
.../xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.18.0.bb| 4 +++-
2 file
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf/libc_memfuncs.patch | 25 ++
meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.32.1.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf/libc_memfuncs.patch
diff --git a/m
These patches have revealed issues with linux kernel headers which has
been proposed upstream but hasnt been applied yet
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
...mpat.h-fix-some-issues-arising-from-in6.h.patch | 81 ++
...t.h-prevent-redefinition-of-struct-ethhdr.patch | 58 +++
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../libcgroup/libcgroup/musl-decls-compat.patch| 235 +
meta/recipes-core/libcgroup/libcgroup_0.41.bb | 4 +
2 files changed, 239 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-core/libcgroup/libcgroup/musl-decls-compat.patch
diff --git
fts is not implemented in musl but many packages depend on it
glibc implements it even though posix does not requir it to do so.
So provide an alternative provider for fts
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
meta/recipes-core/fts/fts.bb | 38 +
.../fts/fts/fts-header-correctness.
Helps configure valgrind for uclibc targets otherwise it tries to assume
funcitons that are implemented in glibc like __free_res
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.10.1.bb | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valg
We now check at configure time of libc has pktinfo struct
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../0003-Fix-header-inclusions-for-musl.patch | 79 +++---
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman/0003-Fix-header-inclusi
Therer are assumptions about glibc headers and features which needs to
be addressed for musl
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../ppp/ppp/0001-Fix-build-with-musl.patch | 163 +
meta/recipes-connectivity/ppp/ppp_2.4.7.bb | 3 +
2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
NIS support is really not there in musl and some fixes
are break the linux = glibc assumption
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
...rpcbynumber-and-getrpcbyname-if-those-are.patch | 89 +
...-use-of-internal-glibc-sys-cdefs.h-header.patch | 1754
...gure-option-to-disable-DES-aut
We do not have musl or uclibc based systems for building OE itself. Most
of build servers run glibc, there will be other issues to build OE on a
uclibc based build system
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletion
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
...-include-sys-types.h-for-dev_t-definition.patch | 30 ++
meta/recipes-kernel/blktrace/blktrace_git.bb | 4 ++-
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-kernel/blktrace/blktrace/0001-include-sys-typ
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers-7.6/musl-decls.patch | 31 ++
.../tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers_7.6.bb | 4 +++
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-extended/tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers-7.6/musl-decls.patch
dif
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../dhcp/0001-include-missing-sys-types.h.patch| 56 ++
meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp_4.3.2.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp/0001-include-missing-sys-types.h.patch
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
...0001-include-rquired-headers-for-typedefs.patch | 45 ++
meta/recipes-kernel/powertop/powertop_2.8.bb | 4 +-
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-kernel/powertop/powertop/0001-include-rquired-
This set of fixes lets core-image-base/core-image-weston/core-image-sato
compile and boot using TCLIBC=musl
The following changes since commit e1a37899da56014693f08d1c39cb6ec0a4ed2bf4:
buildstats-summary/toaster: Cope with removal of get_bn() (2015-12-18
13:50:54 +)
are available in the g
Each time oe-selftest runs, the oe-selftest.log file is overwritten.
This patch solves it by adding time stamp to each selftest log file
and doing a symlink named as oe-selftest.log to the last one created.
Signed-off-by: Costin Constantin
---
scripts/oe-selftest | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 ins
Hi Otavio,
Can you be more explicit about what you mean by weston-launch wrapper? Do you
want to hide the current weston-launch binary and replace it by a new
weston-launch wrapper? What happens to my proposed weston-start, which is
itself a wrapper? Does its functionality move into weston-laun
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Otavio Salvador <
> otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Bruce Ashfield
>> wrote:
>> > f4b27072
>>
>>
>> Use this revision on commit log; latest is not accurat
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Otavio Salvador <
otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
> > f4b27072
>
>
> Use this revision on commit log; latest is not accurate as it moves during
> time.
>
>
We'll disagree on that. The patch has th
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> f4b27072
Use this revision on commit log; latest is not accurate as it moves during time.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.brhttp://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Tom Hochstein
wrote:
> Hi Otavio,
>
> Does the existence of /usr/lib/weston/xwayland.so give us what we want?
>
> if [ -f /usr/lib/weston/xwayland.so ]; then
> mkdir -p /tmp/.X11-unix
> OPTARGS="--modules=xwayland.so $OPTARGS"
>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Tom Hochstein
wrote:
> Thanks, Otavio. Shall I simply quote the weston man page:
>
> When weston is started as the first windowing system (i.e. not under X
> nor under another Wayland server), it should be done with the command
> weston-launch to set up proper priv
26 matches
Mail list logo
