Re: [OE-core] [oe] OEDAM - Portland

If it is of interest to the OE community I can potentially offer Jaguar Land Rover's conference facilities at our Open Source Technology Center (OSTC). OSTC is located in Portland 's Pearl District. We have state-of-the-art facilities with ample space, 20 foot 9-screen video walls, VoIP audio syste

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] libsdl2: update to 2.0.5

* video/wayland patch: similar was applied mainline * waylamd-protocols alignment was stolen from gtk+3 Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller --- ...-sysroot-path-so-that-make-finds-our-wayl.patch | 32 ...ideo-make-it-compatible-with-wayland-1.10.patch | 57 -- .../libs

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] taglib: update to 1.11

without relocation option -fPIC depending packages failed with many error like: | <..>/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/6.2.0/ld: error: <..>/usr/lib/libtag.a(modfilebase.cpp.o): requires unsupported dynamic reloc R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC; recompile with -fPIC Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller --- meta/re

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] u-boot: Update to 2016.09.01 release

On 10/21/2016 09:47 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: Hi! > On 20 October 2016 at 14:35, Marek Vasut > wrote: > > Upgrade U-Boot to the latest version. > > > As usual, u-boot-mkimage broke again: That's weird, I successfully built it for nios2 during my tests. Can you tell me

Re: [OE-core] OEDAM - Portland

Also, if you want to donate directly via check (reduces processing fees, easier for some businesses) see the SPI donation page at: http://spi-inc.org/donations/ It also covers donations from non US people and businesses. Philip On 10/22/2016 01:27 PM, akuster808 wrote: > Hello OE Developers and

[OE-core] [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: Allow ${S} to be overridden

For kernel recipes which fetch sources from an archive instead of git, it's necessary to point ${S} at the extracted sources. In kernel.bbclass there is already logic in base_do_unpack_append() to link ${KERNEL_STAGING_DIR} to ${S} if these aren't the same, so we just need to be able to override ${

[OE-core] OEDAM - Portland

Hello OE Developers and Users, The next OpenEmbedded developer's meeting will be held in Portland before or after ELC; Feb 21-23. A little over 4 months away. In the past, we have relied on funds outside of OE to make our developer meetings a reality. This next meeting, we would like the OEDAM t

Re: [OE-core] basic bitbake commands to create an SDK?

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Khem Raj wrote: > generally meta-toolchain is prior art. You want to use image > specific SDKs so -cpopulate_sdk is fine. In this case it > will include the needed dev headers/libs in your SDK for that given > image automatically it can be any image yet another dumb questi

[OE-core] [PATCH] testsdk.bbclass: Clean up comments, clarify image choices.

Make it clear that SDK testing can use any valid image. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day --- diff --git a/meta/classes/testsdk.bbclass b/meta/classes/testsdk.bbclass index 77c9203..43342b1 100644 --- a/meta/classes/testsdk.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/testsdk.bbclass @@ -4,13 +4,15 @@ # testsdk

Re: [OE-core] basic bitbake commands to create an SDK?

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Oct 22, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Khem Raj wrote: > > > >> generally meta-toolchain is prior art. You want to use image > >> specific SDKs so -cpopulate_sdk is fine. In this case it > >> will include the n

Re: [OE-core] basic bitbake commands to create an SDK?

> On Oct 22, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Khem Raj wrote: > >> generally meta-toolchain is prior art. You want to use image >> specific SDKs so -cpopulate_sdk is fine. In this case it >> will include the needed dev headers/libs in your SDK for that given >

Re: [OE-core] basic bitbake commands to create an SDK?

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Khem Raj wrote: > generally meta-toolchain is prior art. You want to use image > specific SDKs so -cpopulate_sdk is fine. In this case it > will include the needed dev headers/libs in your SDK for that given > image automatically it can be any image ah, good to know, i was

Re: [OE-core] basic bitbake commands to create an SDK?

> On Oct 22, 2016, at 9:05 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > i'm about to dive into SDKs seriously for the first time, so a > shamefully dumb question to make sure i'm starting with the correct > understanding. > > starting with up-to-date OE master branch, i selected > > MACHINE=mpc8315e-r

[OE-core] basic bitbake commands to create an SDK?

i'm about to dive into SDKs seriously for the first time, so a shamefully dumb question to make sure i'm starting with the correct understanding. starting with up-to-date OE master branch, i selected MACHINE=mpc8315e-rdb now, as i see it, i can create just the SDK with either of: $ bitbake

Re: [OE-core] in what recipe context can "bb" show me TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK?

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Ulf Magnusson wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: > > > > a question about chris larson's nifty "bb" utility ... i recently > > figured out that, to get rpm-build into the SDK, i needed to add: > > > > TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK += "nati

Re: [OE-core] in what recipe context can "bb" show me TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK?

Hello, On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > a question about chris larson's nifty "bb" utility ... i recently > figured out that, to get rpm-build into the SDK, i needed to add: > > TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK += "nativesdk-rpm-build" > > to my local.conf. now i'd like to use "b

[OE-core] in what recipe context can "bb" show me TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK?

a question about chris larson's nifty "bb" utility ... i recently figured out that, to get rpm-build into the SDK, i needed to add: TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK += "nativesdk-rpm-build" to my local.conf. now i'd like to use "bb" to display the full value of that variable, but i'm not sure what recipe c