Hello Richard,
I was under impression that installing Ubuntu-14.04.4 (+lastest updates)
would give me stable build environment, unfortunately that is not the case
! I could see the logout issue on this installation too. So I believe that
issue should be reproducible on any 14.04.x installation inc
ping!
BR,
Awais
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
on behalf of Belal, Awais
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 5:19 PM
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] grub_git: extend recipe for proper tar
Ping!
BR,
Awais
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
on behalf of Belal, Awais
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 5:19 PM
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/2] grub-efi/live-vm-common: allow grub as
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:54:54PM +0800, Huang Qiyu wrote:
> Upgrade ncurses from 6.0+20160625 to 6.0+20161126.
This causes build failures for beaglebone and qemumips64 targets:
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/115740/
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/115738/
Plea
On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 15:18 +0530, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> I was under impression that installing Ubuntu-14.04.4 (+lastest
> updates) would give me stable build environment, unfortunately that
> is not the case ! I could see the logout issue on this installation
> too. So I
Hi Chen,
Could you send the opkg-utils patch to opkg-de...@googlegroups.com too?
I would gladly pull it in
--
Cheers,
Alejandro
On 12/22/2016 08:59 PM, Chen Qi wrote:
> If multiple providers for a utility have the same alternatives priority,
> which one would be chosen is determined by which
Alejandro del Castillo (2):
opkg: upgrade to v0.3.4
opkg-utils: bump SRCREV to 0.3.4 tag
...e-defined-bindir-and-mandir-as-installati.patch | 30 ++
.../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/tar_ignore_error.patch | 2 +-
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb | 8 +++---
* Add localstatedir and sysconfdir class-native configure definitions to
override OE default sysroot values.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro del Castillo
---
...001-opkg_conf-create-opkg.lock-in-run-instead-of-var-run.patch | 8
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/{opkg_0.3.3.bb => opkg_0.3.4.bb}
* Add patch that removes hardcoded installation directories.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro del Castillo
---
...e-defined-bindir-and-mandir-as-installati.patch | 30 ++
.../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/tar_ignore_error.patch | 2 +-
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb |
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 14:11 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> There seems to be a consensus that supporting UEFI in OE-core for qemu
> would be valuable, and there have been some (stalled) attempts to add
> it. For reference, see:
>[OE-core] [PATCH V3 0/3] Add UEFI firmware for qemux86*
>[OE-cor
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 16:19 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>
> fwiw, I've been maintaining acpica recipe in meta-oe, and will keep an
> eye here as well.
> meta-luv supports both x86* and arm*, and we have an interest in
> having the same features available and working for qemuaarch64.
I was not awar
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 14:11 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> create mode 100644
> meta/recipes-core/ovmf/ovmf/0001-OvmfPkg-Enable-BGRT-in-OVMF.patch
We added this patch because we were interested in enabling BGRT for our
own Linux kernel testing purposes. I am not sure if this patch is of the
interes
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 14:11 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> From: meta-luv
>
> This is an unmodified copy of
> github.com/01org/luv-yocto/meta-luv/recipes-extended/iasl revision
> 4be4329.
>
> iasl is also provided by the meta-oe layer's acpica recipe. iasl is a
> bit simpler and thus seems more su
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 14:11 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> When used with '-drive if=pflash', qemu will store UEFI variables
> inside the firmware image file. That is unexpected for a file located
> in
> the sysroot, which should be read-only, while it is normal for image
> files in the deploy/images
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 14:11 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> The Fedora srpm [1] seems to have no problems with parallel
> compilation, so let's also use that for the target. The native
> tools however indeed have dependency problems:
True. It is good to paralize what we can. This also looks good to m
On 12/28/2016 01:12 AM, Alejandro del Castillo wrote:
Hi Chen,
Could you send the opkg-utils patch to opkg-de...@googlegroups.com too?
I would gladly pull it in
Done.
Thanks for reminding me about it.
Best Regards,
Chen Qi
--
___
Openembedded-co
16 matches
Mail list logo
