[OE-core] How to patch a local file in a simple elegant way?

2020-02-03 Thread JH
Hello, Is anyway to patch a local file without committing to the git source? I did not realize a local patch is that hard or if it is impossible. In my OE build, I want to make a patch file for mx6ullevk.h in meta-freescale/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2017.03.bb, to customize mtdparts and boota

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] microblaze tune: Enable 64-bit

2020-02-03 Thread Nathan Rossi
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 04:36, Mark Hatle wrote: > > > > On 1/31/20 10:50 PM, Nathan Rossi wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 09:33, Mark Hatle > > wrote: > >> > >> From: Mark Hatle > >> > >> 64-bit is not yet available in Linux, but some non-Linux uses exist. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle >

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] ncurses: add CVE_VERSION

2020-02-03 Thread Anuj Mittal
Include the version number in a format that is comparable to what we get from NVD. Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal --- meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_6.1+20191019.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_6.1+20191019.bb b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] x264: upgrade to latest revision

2020-02-03 Thread Anuj Mittal
Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal --- .../x264/x264/Fix-X32-build-by-disabling-asm.patch | 14 ++ meta/recipes-multimedia/x264/x264_git.bb | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/x264/x264/Fix-X32-build-by-disabling-asm.pa

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] libxml2: fix CVE-2020-7595

2020-02-03 Thread Anuj Mittal
Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal --- .../libxml/libxml2/CVE-2020-7595.patch| 36 +++ meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2_2.9.10.bb| 1 + 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2/CVE-2020-7595.patch diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/l

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] sqlite3: upgrade 3.30.1 -> 3.31.1

2020-02-03 Thread Anuj Mittal
Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal --- meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.30.1.bb | 20 --- meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.31.1.bb | 12 +++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.30.1.bb create mode

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] sqlite3: upgrade 3.30.1 -> 3.31.1

2020-02-03 Thread Anuj Mittal
Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal --- .../sqlite/sqlite3/CVE-2019-19244.patch | 33 -- .../sqlite/sqlite3/CVE-2019-19880.patch | 33 -- .../sqlite/sqlite3/CVE-2019-19923.patch | 50 -- .../sqlite/sqlite3/CVE-2019-19924.patch | 65 --- .

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc-9.2: fix bug #91102 'aarch64 ICE on Linux kernel with -Os'

2020-02-03 Thread akuster808
On 2/3/20 7:57 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > this is ok. Also please ask it to be backported to 9.3 on gcc bugzilla And zeus : ) - armin > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 6:20 PM Taras Kondratiuk wrote: >> Linux kernel compilation for aarch64 triggers ICE if >> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y. >> >> The rootc

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc-9.2: fix bug #91102 'aarch64 ICE on Linux kernel with -Os'

2020-02-03 Thread Khem Raj
this is ok. Also please ask it to be backported to 9.3 on gcc bugzilla On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 6:20 PM Taras Kondratiuk wrote: > > Linux kernel compilation for aarch64 triggers ICE if > CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y. > > The rootcause is GCC bug #91102 'aarch64 ICE on Linux kernel with -Os'. > App

[OE-core] [PATCH] gcc-9.2: fix bug #91102 'aarch64 ICE on Linux kernel with -Os'

2020-02-03 Thread Taras Kondratiuk via Openembedded-core
Linux kernel compilation for aarch64 triggers ICE if CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y. The rootcause is GCC bug #91102 'aarch64 ICE on Linux kernel with -Os'. Apply the fix to 9.2. Signed-off-by: Taras Kondratiuk --- meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-9.2.inc | 1 + ...02-aarch64-ICE-on-Linux-

[OE-core] [PATCH] webkitgtk: Prefer -pthread over -lpthread

2020-02-03 Thread Khem Raj
-pthread is compiler driver option which links in needed dependencies for pthreads along with -lpthread, this aids in fixing build failures on rv64 Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...1-Enable-THREADS_PREFER_PTHREAD_FLAG.patch | 45 +++ meta/recipes-sato/webkit/webkitgtk_2.26.2.bb |

Re: [OE-core] Failed to add u-boot ubifs (not working)

2020-02-03 Thread JH
Hi Quentin, Thanks for your response. On 2/3/20, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi JH, > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 09:56:49PM +1100, JH wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I added my local machine to ubifs, is it correct? >> >> UBOOT_CONFIG[nand] = "mx6ull_14x14_evk_nand_config,ubifs" >> > > Also, you need to select U

[OE-core] [PATCH] kernel-yocto.bbclass: export LD in the environment used by kconf_check

2020-02-03 Thread Martin Jansa
* resolves following exceptions in log.do_kernel_configcheck: DEBUG: Executing python function do_kernel_configcheck Traceback (most recent call last): File "/OE/build/oe-core/tmp-glibc/work/qemux86_64-oe-linux/linux-yocto/5.4.15-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/kconfiglib.py", line 2776, in _e

[OE-core] [OE-Core][PATCH v2] systemd: Upgrade 243.2 -> 243.4-latest

2020-02-03 Thread Alex Kiernan
Update to latest on the 243 stable branch. This includes (amongst other fixes) seccomp filter changes which fix failures with glibc 2.31, e.g. systemd-journald[543]: Assertion 'clock_gettime(map_clock_id(clock_id), &ts) == 0' failed at src/basic/time-util.c:55, function now(). Aborting. Refres

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] kern-tools: tweak symbol_why to be python safe

2020-02-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:11 PM Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 04:26:41PM -0500, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Bruce Ashfield > > > > Updating the SRCREV to pickup tweaks to symbol_why.py to be > > python3 safe: > > > > - we explicitly call /usr/bin/env python3 > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] kern-tools: tweak symbol_why to be python safe

2020-02-03 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 04:26:41PM -0500, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Bruce Ashfield > > Updating the SRCREV to pickup tweaks to symbol_why.py to be > python3 safe: > > - we explicitly call /usr/bin/env python3 > - we full specifiy our symbols > - do not assume that 'None' can

[OE-core] [PATCH] kern-tools: tweak symbol_why to be python safe

2020-02-03 Thread bruce . ashfield
From: Bruce Ashfield Updating the SRCREV to pickup tweaks to symbol_why.py to be python3 safe: - we explicitly call /usr/bin/env python3 - we full specifiy our symbols - do not assume that 'None' can be converted to a string Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- I didn't realized the v5.4 s

Re: [OE-core] [OE-Core][PATCH] systemd: Upgrade 243.2 -> 243.4-latest

2020-02-03 Thread Alex Kiernan
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:51 PM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > Since move to 243 latest needs further work, how about moving straight to 244? > > Alex > Having realised it was local to OE-Core, it was easy to find the problem. The upstream change that I guessed at before is what's caused the behavi

[OE-core] [PATCH] python3-six: Move src_uri checks to recipe main

2020-02-03 Thread Khem Raj
.inc is used by other versions of recipe as well, therefore putting checksums in .inc will break them unless the version is same as in oe-core Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-six.inc| 3 --- meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-six_1.14.0.bb | 2 ++ 2 file

Re: [OE-core] [OE-Core][PATCH] systemd: Upgrade 243.2 -> 243.4-latest

2020-02-03 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Since move to 243 latest needs further work, how about moving straight to 244? Alex > On 3 Feb 2020, at 21.26, Alex Kiernan wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:55 PM Alex Kiernan wrote: >> >> Hi Richard >> >>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 2:13 PM Alex Kiernan wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020

Re: [OE-core] [OE-Core][PATCH] systemd: Upgrade 243.2 -> 243.4-latest

2020-02-03 Thread Alex Kiernan
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:55 PM Alex Kiernan wrote: > > Hi Richard > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 2:13 PM Alex Kiernan wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 10:26 AM Richard Purdie > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 23:13 +, Alex Kiernan wrote: > > > > Update to latest on the 243 stable

Re: [OE-core] [OE-Core][PATCH] systemd: Upgrade 243.2 -> 243.4-latest

2020-02-03 Thread Alex Kiernan
Hi Richard On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 2:13 PM Alex Kiernan wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 10:26 AM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 23:13 +, Alex Kiernan wrote: > > > Update to latest on the 243 stable branch. This includes (amongst other > > > fixes) seccomp filter chang

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/2] microblaze tune: cleanup +=

2020-02-03 Thread Mark Hatle
I just found a problem with this one in further testing. So please don't merge. There will be a v3. --Mark On 1/31/20 5:33 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > From: Mark Hatle > > Various += were used, refactor these to be either = or .= depending on > usuage. > > CONFLICTS should be '=', as no leading

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] microblaze tune: Correct two minor issues with the microblaze tune

2020-02-03 Thread Mark Hatle
On 1/31/20 10:49 PM, Nathan Rossi wrote: > On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 08:13, Mark Hatle > wrote: >> >> From: Mark Hatle >> >> TUNE_ARCH - microblazeeb is not a valid architecture, microblaze is big >> endian, microblazeel is the little endian version. >> >> Version arguments: >> If a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] glibc: don't ignore global LDFLAGS settings

2020-02-03 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
ping On 20/01/2020 16.42, Khem Raj wrote: > this patch is ok but I have reservations since += now means global > ldflags will be applied > so it would need some testing to ensure it works well. > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 1:23 AM Rasmus Villemoes > wrote: >> >> Two things: The -Wl,-rpath-link c

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] microblaze tune: cleanup +=

2020-02-03 Thread Mark Hatle
Yes, I didn't realize it was in Zeus. The same patches should apply to Zeus directly.. (All of the recent Microblaze Tune set...) If you want to limit it to just this one, I can certainly rebase it for you. --Mark On 1/31/20 6:47 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 1/31/20 3:23 PM, Mark Hatle wro

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] microblaze tune: Enable 64-bit

2020-02-03 Thread Mark Hatle
On 1/31/20 10:50 PM, Nathan Rossi wrote: > On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 09:33, Mark Hatle > wrote: >> >> From: Mark Hatle >> >> 64-bit is not yet available in Linux, but some non-Linux uses exist. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle >> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle >> --- >> meta/conf/machine/include/mic

[OE-core] [PATCHv2] kernel.bbclass: set LD in KERNEL_CONFIG_COMMAND to fix 5.4+ builds when gold is enabled

2020-02-03 Thread Martin Jansa
* with 5.4 kernel the do_configure fails when gold is enabled (with ld-is-gold in DISTRO_FEATURES) * bfd is already being set in KERNEL_LD: kernel-arch.bbclass:KERNEL_LD = "${CCACHE}${HOST_PREFIX}ld.bfd ${HOST_LD_KERNEL_ARCH}" but KERNEL_LD is currently respected only by do_compile and do_com

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for : kernel-yocto: v5.4 LTS kernel (rev2)

2020-02-03 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: : kernel-yocto: v5.4 LTS kernel (rev2) Revision: 2 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/22338/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been executed

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] linux-yocto: introduce 5.4 recipes

2020-02-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:32 AM Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 08:45:40AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:42 AM Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > > It fails to build with gold enabled (ld-is-gold in DISTRO_FEATURES) > > > > > > First olddefconfig fails with "gold lin

[OE-core] Reminder: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting @ Monthly from 8am on the first Tuesday (PDT)

2020-02-03 Thread sjolley.yp.pm
All, Just a reminder we will hold the monthly Yocto Project Technical Meeting at 8am PST tomorrow. (2/4) Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting: We encourage people attending the meeting to logon and announce themselves on the Yocto Project IRC chancel during the meeting (optional): Yocto

[OE-core] [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: set LD in KERNEL_CONFIG_COMMAND to fix 5.4+ builds when gold is enabled

2020-02-03 Thread Martin Jansa
* with 5.4 kernel the do_configure fails when gold is enabled (with ld-is-gold in DISTRO_FEATURES) * bfd is already being set in KERNEL_LD: kernel-arch.bbclass:KERNEL_LD = "${CCACHE}${HOST_PREFIX}ld.bfd ${HOST_LD_KERNEL_ARCH}" but KERNEL_LD is currently respected only by do_compile and do_com

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] linux-yocto: introduce 5.4 recipes

2020-02-03 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 08:45:40AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:42 AM Martin Jansa wrote: > > > It fails to build with gold enabled (ld-is-gold in DISTRO_FEATURES) > > > > First olddefconfig fails with "gold linker 'x86_64-oe-linux-ld' not > > supported" and then it fails wit

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] rt-tests: modernise subprocess: preexec_fn=os.setsid -> start_new_session=True

2020-02-03 Thread André Draszik
start_new_session was added to python3 subprocess in v3.2 and is meant to take the place of the common use of preexec_fn to call os.setsid() in the child - as done here. Update to use the new equivalent. Signed-off-by: André Draszik --- meta/recipes-rt/rt-tests/files/rt_bmark.py | 4 ++-- 1 fil

[OE-core] Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed

2020-02-03 Thread sjolley.yp.pm
All, The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on the triage page under the appropriate heading: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage#N

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] oeqa: modernise subprocess: preexec_fn=os.setsid -> start_new_session=True

2020-02-03 Thread André Draszik
start_new_session was added to python3 subprocess in v3.2 and is meant to take the place of the common use of preexec_fn to call os.setsid() in the child - as done here. Update to use the new equivalent. Signed-off-by: André Draszik --- meta/lib/oeqa/controllers/masterimage.py | 2 +- meta/lib/

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] linux-yocto: introduce 5.4 recipes

2020-02-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:45 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:42 AM Martin Jansa wrote: >> >> It fails to build with gold enabled (ld-is-gold in DISTRO_FEATURES) >> >> First olddefconfig fails with "gold linker 'x86_64-oe-linux-ld' not >> supported" and then it fails with a bi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] linux-yocto: introduce 5.4 recipes

2020-02-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:42 AM Martin Jansa wrote: > It fails to build with gold enabled (ld-is-gold in DISTRO_FEATURES) > > First olddefconfig fails with "gold linker 'x86_64-oe-linux-ld' not > supported" and then it fails with a bit misleading error about oldnoconfig > (which is called only whe

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] linux-yocto: introduce 5.4 recipes

2020-02-03 Thread Martin Jansa
It fails to build with gold enabled (ld-is-gold in DISTRO_FEATURES) First olddefconfig fails with "gold linker 'x86_64-oe-linux-ld' not supported" and then it fails with a bit misleading error about oldnoconfig (which is called only when oddefconfig fails) and then the whole log repeats itself aga

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 06/24] bison: upgrade 3.4.2 -> 3.5

2020-02-03 Thread Khem Raj
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/368059/ On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:34 AM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/bison/{bison_3.4.2.bb => bison_3.5.bb} | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > rename meta/rec

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] libxshmfence: Set shm directory deterministically

2020-02-03 Thread Richard Purdie
Without setting this it will vary depending on which directories are present on the host. [YOCTO #13778] Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxshmfence_1.3.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxshmfence_1.3.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] sudo: Set vardir deterministically

2020-02-03 Thread Richard Purdie
Without setting this it will vary depending on which directories are present on the host. [YOCTO #13775] Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.8.29.bb | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.8.29.bb b/meta/recipes-exte

Re: [OE-core] [OE-Core][PATCH] systemd: Upgrade 243.2 -> 243.4-latest

2020-02-03 Thread Alex Kiernan
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 10:26 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 23:13 +, Alex Kiernan wrote: > > Update to latest on the 243 stable branch. This includes (amongst other > > fixes) seccomp filter changes which fix failures with glibc 2.31, e.g. > > > > systemd-journald[543]: A

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] ifupdown: add ptest

2020-02-03 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I think a build configuration for this also needs to be enabled and tested as explained in the email thread from the bug (in magefeatures.py from selftest I think). Otherwise this wouldn’t be built or checked anywhere. Alex > On 3 Feb 2020, at 10.14, > wrote: > > From: Kai Kang > > Add pt

[OE-core] [PATCH] piglit: don't stage the test suite

2020-02-03 Thread Ross Burton
The Piglit test suite is approximately 2GB and because it's installed into $libdir is added to the sysroot archive. Nothing links against Piglit so there's no reason for this, so remove $libdir from Piglit's sysroot. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/piglit/piglit_git.bb | 5

[OE-core] [PATCH] ifupdown: add ptest

2020-02-03 Thread kai.kang
From: Kai Kang Add ptest for ifupdown with its own test cases. [Yocto #13736] Signed-off-by: Kai Kang --- meta/recipes-core/ifupdown/files/run-ptest| 4 ++ .../ifupdown/files/tweak-ptest-script.patch | 49 +++ meta/recipes-core/ifupdown/ifupdown_0.8.35.bb | 10 +++- 3 f

Re: [OE-core] Failed to add u-boot ubifs (not working)

2020-02-03 Thread Quentin Schulz
Hi JH, On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 09:56:49PM +1100, JH wrote: > Hi, > > I added my local machine to ubifs, is it correct? > > UBOOT_CONFIG[nand] = "mx6ull_14x14_evk_nand_config,ubifs" > Also, you need to select UBOOT_CONFIG somewhere, with the above line, you just say "if nand is selected as an U

[OE-core] Failed to add u-boot ubifs (not working)

2020-02-03 Thread JH
Hi, I added my local machine to ubifs, is it correct? UBOOT_CONFIG[nand] = "mx6ull_14x14_evk_nand_config,ubifs" I built the u-boot.imx, but the ubi was still missing in u-boot. What I could be missing? => run nand-boot; Unknown command 'ubi' - try 'help' Unknown command 'ubi' - try 'help' Than

Re: [OE-core] [OE-Core][PATCH] systemd: Upgrade 243.2 -> 243.4-latest

2020-02-03 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 23:13 +, Alex Kiernan wrote: > Update to latest on the 243 stable branch. This includes (amongst other > fixes) seccomp filter changes which fix failures with glibc 2.31, e.g. > > systemd-journald[543]: Assertion 'clock_gettime(map_clock_id(clock_id), > &ts) == 0' fail

[OE-core] [PATCH] podfix: remove

2020-02-03 Thread Ross Burton
Now that we don't use the host pod2man (oe-core deda455) the podfix class is redundant and can be removed. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/classes/podfix.bbclass | 35 --- .../classes/reproducible_build_simple.bbclass | 2 -- 2 files changed, 37 deletions(-

[OE-core] [PATCH] ifupdown: add ptest

2020-02-03 Thread kai.kang
From: Kai Kang Add ptest for ifupdown with its own test cases. [Yocto #13736] Signed-off-by: Kai Kang --- meta/recipes-core/ifupdown/files/run-ptest| 4 ++ .../ifupdown/files/tweak-ptest-script.patch | 49 +++ meta/recipes-core/ifupdown/ifupdown_0.8.35.bb | 10 +++- 3 f

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 22/24] xserver-xorg: upgrade 1.20.6 -> 1.20.7

2020-02-03 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 10:07 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin > --- > .../{xserver-xorg_1.20.6.bb => xserver-xorg_1.20.7.bb}| 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/{xserver-xorg_1.20.6.bb =>

[OE-core] [PATCH] lttng-modules: update to 2.11.1

2020-02-03 Thread zhe.he
From: He Zhe Fix build failure with kernel v5.5. Remove patch as issues fixed upstream. Signed-off-by: He Zhe --- ...modules_2.11.0.bb => lttng-modules_2.11.1.bb} | 16 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/{lttng-modules_2.11.0.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH] lttng-modules: update to 2.11.1

2020-02-03 Thread zhe.he
From: He Zhe Fix build failure with kernel v5.5. Remove patch as issues fixed upstream. Signed-off-by: He Zhe --- ...modules_2.11.0.bb => lttng-modules_2.11.1.bb} | 16 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/{lttng-modules_2.11.0.bb