Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: copy some more needed files in do_shared_workdir

2020-04-21 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:32 PM Dan Callaghan wrote: > > Excerpts from Bruce Ashfield's message of 2020-04-21 08:33:34 -04:00: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:37 AM Dan Callaghan > > wrote: > > > > > > We need to copy include/config/auto.conf into ${STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR} > > > to avoid module

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for diffoscope: upgrade 136 -> 141

2020-04-21 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: diffoscope: upgrade 136 -> 141 Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/23833/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the

[OE-core][PATCH] diffoscope: upgrade 136 -> 141

2020-04-21 Thread Joshua Watt
From: Upgrade Helper Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt --- .../diffoscope/{diffoscope_136.bb => diffoscope_141.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-support/diffoscope/{diffoscope_136.bb => diffoscope_141.bb} (75%) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: copy some more needed files in do_shared_workdir

2020-04-21 Thread Dan Callaghan
Excerpts from Bruce Ashfield's message of 2020-04-21 08:33:34 -04:00: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:37 AM Dan Callaghan > wrote: > > > > We need to copy include/config/auto.conf into ${STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR} > > to avoid module compilation errors like this: > > > > | make[1]: Entering

[OE-core] [PATCH v3] boost: revert 1.72.0 regression

2020-04-21 Thread Andrew Geissler
https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_72_0.html documents a "Known Issue" and has a revert patch for an issue that causes code to fail to compile that includes the coroutine function. Without this patch, code which includes the asymmetric_coroutine.hpp will fail to compile. Signed-off-by:

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] go: Rely on go-runtime to provide needed modules

2020-04-21 Thread Khem Raj
go compiler is including go/src/cmd modules in -dev package which is in conflict with go-runtime-dev which provides exact same copy of this module along with other runtime modules, as a result when both go-dev and go-runtime-dev are included in image then it results in rootfs failures, here lets

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] packagegroup-go-sdk-target: Add go to packagegroup

2020-04-21 Thread Khem Raj
This ensures that we have go compiler installed into image along with runtime Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-go-sdk-target.bb | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-go-sdk-target.bb

[OE-core] [master][dunfell][PATCH] scripts/install-buildtools: bump to 3.1 release by default

2020-04-21 Thread Tim Orling
By default, use the extended buildtools installer from the Yocto Project 3.1 "dunfell" release. Signed-off-by: Tim Orling --- scripts/install-buildtools | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/install-buildtools b/scripts/install-buildtools index

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for boost: revert 1.72.0 regression

2020-04-21 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: boost: revert 1.72.0 regression Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/23828/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been executed on

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] boost: revert 1.72.0 regression

2020-04-21 Thread Andrew Geissler
https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_72_0.html documents a "Known Issue" and has a revert patch for an issue that causes code to fail to compile that includes the coroutine function. Without this patch, code which includes the asymmetric_coroutine.hpp will fail to compile.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] boost: revert 1.72.0 regression

2020-04-21 Thread Alexander Kanavin
You need to sign-off the patch as yourself. Upstream-Status: should be Backport [link to github commit] Alex On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 21:31, Andrew Geissler wrote: > The patch needs an Upstream-Status. Is it a backport (then the link to > repo needs to be provided)? > > Thanks for the quick

[OE-core] AUH monthly stats, manual resend

2020-04-21 Thread auh
Recipe upgrade statistics: * Failed (devtool error): 38 build-compare, 2019.08.14-new-commits-available, Paul Eggleton python3-gitdb, 4.0.2, Oleksandr Kravchuk systemd-boot, 245.4, Chen Qi automake, 1.16.2, Robert Yang ovmf, edk2-stable202002,

[OE-core] This is a test mail from AUH, please ignore

2020-04-21 Thread auh
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#137355): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/137355 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/73181742/21656 Group Owner:

[OE-core] OpenEmbedded developers virtual happy hour

2020-04-21 Thread Philip Balister
We (the OpenEmbedded board, with help from Automotive Grade Linux who are providing the meeting "space") would like to invite you a a virtual happy hour on April 29 at Noon EDT, 6PM CET (Is that the right TZ) We'd like to come and show off their projects and give us all a chance to say hello

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] boost: revert 1.72.0 regression

2020-04-21 Thread Andrew Geissler
> > The patch needs an Upstream-Status. Is it a backport (then the link to > repo needs to be provided)? Thanks for the quick review Alexander. My understanding is that boost released 1.72.0 and then found this regression so they provide a link to this patch on their 1.72.0 release page.

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "boost: switch over to sourcefo..." and 1 more

2020-04-21 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: "boost: switch over to sourcefo..." and 1 more Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/23826/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] boost: revert 1.72.0 regression

2020-04-21 Thread Alexander Kanavin
The patch needs an Upstream-Status. Is it a backport (then the link to repo needs to be provided)? Alex On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 18:12, Andrew Geissler wrote: > https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_72_0.html documents a > "Known Issue" and has a revert patch for an issue that causes

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] boost: switch over to sourceforge

2020-04-21 Thread Andrew Geissler
dl.binary has a monthly download limit. The issue is documented in https://github.com/boostorg/boost/issues/299 Yocto has backup/caching for issues like this but it's best to not contribute to that download limit if the same file is hosted over at sourceforge. Signed-off-by: Andrew Geissler ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] boost: revert 1.72.0 regression

2020-04-21 Thread Andrew Geissler
https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_72_0.html documents a "Known Issue" and has a revert patch for an issue that causes code to fail to compile that includes the coroutine function. Without this patch, code which includes the asymmetric_coroutine.hpp will fail to compile. Signed-off-by:

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "oeqa/selftest: Add test for co..." and 1 more

2020-04-21 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: "oeqa/selftest: Add test for co..." and 1 more Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/23824/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] staging: Fix overlapping file failures

2020-04-21 Thread Richard Purdie
If there are different providers of a file and they are swiched when the recipe isn't machine specific, we can get tracebacks due to the overlapping files. The issue is that the previous provider isn't uninstalled since the system can't tell whether some later task needs them. By tracking which

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] oeqa/selftest: Add test for conflicting sysroot provider

2020-04-21 Thread Richard Purdie
sysroot-test depends on virtual/sysroot-test which we build for one machine, switch machine, switch provider of virtual/sysroot-test and check that the sysroot is correctly cleaned up. The files in the two providers overlap so can cause errors if the sysroot code doesn't function correctly. Yes,

[OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW15'20

2020-04-21 Thread Stephen Jolley
Current Dev Position: YP 3.1 Being released Next Deadline: YP 3.1 release date 2020/4/24 Next Team Meetings: * Bug Triage meeting Thursday Apr. 23rd at 7:30am PDT ( https://zoom.us/j/454367603) * Monthly Project Meeting Tuesday May 5th at 8am PDT (

Re: [OE-core] [oe][zeus][PATCH] git: Security Advisory - git - CVE-2020-5260

2020-04-21 Thread Anuj Mittal
On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 07:14 -0700, akuster wrote: > > > On 4/21/20 1:18 AM, Li Zhou wrote: > > Backport patch from > 9a6bbee8006c24b46a85d29e7b38cfa79e9ab21b> to solve CVE-2020-5260. > > Does this affect dunfell or master? It affects both. There's a patch

Re: [OE-core] [oe][zeus][PATCH] git: Security Advisory - git - CVE-2020-5260

2020-04-21 Thread akuster
On 4/21/20 1:18 AM, Li Zhou wrote: > Backport patch from 9a6bbee8006c24b46a85d29e7b38cfa79e9ab21b> to solve CVE-2020-5260. Does this affect dunfell or master? > > Signed-off-by: Li Zhou > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/git/git.inc | 4 +- >

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for xf86-video-intel: update to the latest SRCREV

2020-04-21 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: xf86-video-intel: update to the latest SRCREV Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/23823/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been

[OE-core][PATCH] xf86-video-intel: update to the latest SRCREV

2020-04-21 Thread LiweiSong
update xf86-video-intel to the latest SRCREV and drop the video bug fix patch since the latest xf86 already involved it. Signed-off-by: Liwei Song --- ...1-Sync-i915_pciids-upto-8717c6b7414f.patch | 505 -- .../xorg-driver/xf86-video-intel_git.bb | 3 +- 2 files changed,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: copy some more needed files in do_shared_workdir

2020-04-21 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:37 AM Dan Callaghan wrote: > > We need to copy include/config/auto.conf into ${STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR} > to avoid module compilation errors like this: > > | make[1]: Entering directory > 'build/tmp-glibc/work-shared/machine/kernel-source' > | make[2]: Entering

[OE-core] [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: copy some more needed files in do_shared_workdir

2020-04-21 Thread Dan Callaghan
We need to copy include/config/auto.conf into ${STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR} to avoid module compilation errors like this: | make[1]: Entering directory 'build/tmp-glibc/work-shared/machine/kernel-source' | make[2]: Entering directory

[OE-core] [oe][zeus][PATCH] git: Security Advisory - git - CVE-2020-5260

2020-04-21 Thread Li Zhou
Backport patch from to solve CVE-2020-5260. Signed-off-by: Li Zhou --- meta/recipes-devtools/git/git.inc | 4 +- meta/recipes-devtools/git/git/CVE-2020-5260.patch | 65 +++ 2 files