Excerpts from Khem Raj's message of 2020-07-22 23:09:23 -07:00:
> there is stress recipe in some layers which could provide stress
> utility as well, therefore it should be using update-alternatives
> mechanism so it fills in when stress is not provided by say stress
> recipe.
Hmm... The stress
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:06 AM Dan Callaghan
wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Khem Raj's message of 2020-07-22 23:09:23 -07:00:
> > there is stress recipe in some layers which could provide stress
> > utility as well, therefore it should be using update-alternatives
> > mechanism so it fills in when stre
infact the error is not limited to just one theme recipe but all which
inherit this class see
http://jenkins.nas-admin.org/view/OE/job/oe_world_workspace-compare-signatures/980/console
so are we forcing same kind of fix everywhere ? seems a bit of kludge to me
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:55 PM Ch
In commit 72641004, stress-ng was made to provide the stress package,
because it's backwards compatible with the old stress command. But it
doesn't actually provide /usr/bin/stress which is what other recipes
depending on stress will expect.
Symlink /usr/bin/stress to stress-ng so that it actually
Hi Bruce, Steve,
Thanks for your replies and the help.
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 04:33, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:58 PM Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:27 PM Ryan Harkin
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Just an FYI, but when this was submitted, my imx7s-warp
List of files defined using IMAGE_BOOT_FILES are installed into
the boot partition when preparing an image using the wic tool with
the bootimg-efi source plugin.
The code snippet introduced is taken as is from bootimg-partition.py
Change-Id: I8dbb6b4e7c24870f587a6f31e6ae4a87d7033782
Issue-Id: PLA
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 15:31 +0200, Fredrik Gustafsson wrote:
> OE-core today has three different package managers, the well-known
> formats deb
> and rpm is supported as well as ipkg that is good for embedded
> devices.
>
> When building and having a good cache hit, a significant amount of
> time
Currently we rely on disk usage to compute rootfs size that may vary
depending on build machine filesystem type.
Consider following case:
Build machine 1: ext4 filesystem:
$ du -ks
tmp-rpb-glibc/work/qemuarm64-linaro-linux/rpb-console-image/1.0-r0/rootfs/
403024
tmp-rpb-glibc/work/qemuarm64-l
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:34 AM Ryan Harkin wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce, Steve,
>
> Thanks for your replies and the help.
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 04:33, Steve Sakoman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:58 PM Bruce Ashfield
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:27 PM Ryan Harkin wrote:
>
Hi Bruce,
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 13:27, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:34 AM Ryan Harkin
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bruce, Steve,
> >
> > Thanks for your replies and the help.
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 04:33, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:58 PM Bruce
We never enable the tests, however the "directory" is processed, perhaps by
code that is never executed, but the code is built into the library. Since it
is already dealing with a directory that will not exist on the target, I felt
it safer just to feed it a "safe" name and let upstream deal wi
One final change prior to the dunfell 3.1.2 release build
The following changes since commit e8de5271aeebd151b3fbe47d47a1c5f6969320e7:
glibc: whitelist CVE-2010-10029 (2020-07-21 06:52:40 -1000)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sta
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:38 AM Ryan Harkin wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 13:27, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:34 AM Ryan Harkin wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Bruce, Steve,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your replies and the help.
>> >
>> > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 04:33, Ste
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 16:05, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:38 AM Ryan Harkin
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 13:27, Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:34 AM Ryan Harkin
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Bruce, Steve,
> >> >
> >> >
Hey guys,
Sorry for jumping into this thread a bit later - I saw that it has
been sorted out already.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 6:06 PM Ryan Harkin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 16:05, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:38 AM Ryan Harkin wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Bruce,
>> >
On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 10:57 +0100, Richard Purdie via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 15:31 +0200, Fredrik Gustafsson wrote:
> > OE-core today has three different package managers, the well-known
> > formats deb
> > and rpm is supported as well as ipkg that is good for embedde
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:34 PM Andrey Zhizhikin wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Sorry for jumping into this thread a bit later - I saw that it has
> been sorted out already.
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 6:06 PM Ryan Harkin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 16:05, Bruce Ashfield
> > wrote:
Hi,
I think currently IMAGE_BOOT_FILES test run on bootimg-partition only.
Could you add test cases for bootimg-efi too?
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
On Behalf Of Khasim Mohammed
Sent: Thursday, 23 July, 2020 5:52 PM
To: openembedded-core@lists.opene
Signed-off-by: Zang Ruochen
---
.../libevdev/{libevdev_1.9.0.bb => libevdev_1.9.1.bb} | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-support/libevdev/{libevdev_1.9.0.bb => libevdev_1.9.1.bb}
(78%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libevdev/libevdev_1.9.0.
Signed-off-by: Zang Ruochen
---
.../mpg123/{mpg123_1.26.2.bb => mpg123_1.26.3.bb} | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
rename meta/recipes-multimedia/mpg123/{mpg123_1.26.2.bb => mpg123_1.26.3.bb}
(96%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/mpg123/mpg123_1.26.2.bb
On 7/23/20 4:35 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
infact the error is not limited to just one theme recipe but all which
inherit this class see
http://jenkins.nas-admin.org/view/OE/job/oe_world_workspace-compare-signatures/980/console
so are we forcing same kind of fix everywhere ? seems a bit of kludge to m
From: Lee Chee Yang
layer under test should absent from BBLAYERS when running
yocto-check-layer. This allow to get signatures before layer
under test. There are existing steps to add the layer under
test to BBLAYERS after getting initial signatures.
add steps to check for layer under test in BBL
Instead of recognizing only environment-setup scripts in
${STAGING_DIR_TARGET} or ${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}, respectively - lurk also into
${SDKPATH}/buildtools/sysroots/${SDK_SYS} where nativesdk-openssl installs
setup files.
Signed-off-by: Jens Rehsack
---
meta/classes/toolchain-scripts.bbclass |
Remove overwriting of OPENSSL_CONF from buildtools-tarball.bb to clarify
whether nativesdk-openssl installs wrong content or buildtools-tarball:
(nativesdk-openssl) tmp/sysroots/x86_64/usr/lib/ssl-1.1/openssl.cnf
(buildtools-tarball)
buildtools/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/etc/ssl/openssl
bootimg-efi is updated to install files listed in IMAGE_BOOT_FILES
into the boot partition. The test_mkefidisk in oeqa selftest is
updated to run IMAGE_BOOT_FILES test for bootimg-efi.
Change-Id: Id577e853fecc5fe58531c7afa33db3b1c00c8319
Signed-off-by: Khasim Syed Mohammed
---
meta/lib/oeqa/self
Hi Lee,
On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 12:12 +0530, Khasim Mohammed wrote:
>
>
> From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org <
> openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org> on behalf of Lee Chee Yang
> via lists.openembedded.org <
> chee.yang.lee=intel@lists.op
26 matches
Mail list logo
