On 22.07.2021 23:13, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 21:39 +0200, Vyacheslav Yurkov wrote:
It's often desired in Embedded System design to have a read-only rootfs.
But a lot of different applications might want to have a read-write access
to some parts of a filesystem. It can be
From: Kai Kang
It does not show correct version info of python3-pytest by:
$ pip3 list | grep pytest
pytest 0.0.0
Remove 0001-setup.py-remove-the-setup_requires-for-setuptools-scm.patch
and depends on python3-setuptools-scm-native to make it right.
Signed-off-by: Kai Kang
---
Update gcc, drop patches that have been merged upstream
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer
---
.../gcc/{gcc-11.1.inc => gcc-11.2.inc}| 12 +-
...ian_11.1.bb => gcc-cross-canadian_11.2.bb} | 0
.../{gcc-cross_11.1.bb => gcc-cross_11.2.bb} | 0
...-crosssdk_11.1.bb =>
On some x86 platforms there were header issues causing pt_regs compile
failures for our stap tests, e.g. on genericx86-64 but not qemux86-64.
Backport a patch from upstream which fixes the issue.
[YOCTO #14491]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
---
...8b9eda402e4e96c4e3ce01e7ff95d3e10470.patch |
On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 15:15 +0100, Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
> This adds a script I've developed to migrate metadata to use the new override
> syntax. It is a bit rough but since its for a single use with validation, it
> doesn't need to be perfect. It is run simply as:
>
Using prepend as part of a function name is a poor choice. Whilst we're
about to make the syntax explict, improve the names anyway making the
conversion easier and the intent clear that this isn't an override.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
---
meta/classes/autotools.bbclass | 4 ++--
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:49 AM Luca Bocassi wrote:
>
> Having a look at the patches, a few comments:
>
> - 0012-don-t-pass-AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW-flag-to-faccessat.patch I find
> quite worrying, as it fundamentally changes access patterns, some of
> which are done for security reasons. At best,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:54 AM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 14:49 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 12:59 +, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > Latest upgrade to 249 broke a working build on musl, this is incremental
> > > fix to exisiting patches adapted to 249
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 5:55 AM Robert Berger
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does this mean we have musl and systemd working together?
>
yes it was always there
> Regards,
>
> Robert
>
> On 27/07/2021 23:13, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Latest upgrade to 249 broke a working build on musl, this is incremental
> >
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:37:28 +0200
"Damian Wrobel" wrote:
> the PSEUDO_MSG_OP is being unconditionally assigned to the msg.type
> before any real usage of the 'msg' structure. So, if I'm not mistaken
> that code was already tested and didn't work well and was reverted
> here[1].
I don't think
I have to wonder again if it would be better to maintain the musl spin of
systemd in a separate repo and provided via separate recipe?
Alex
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 15:54, Luca Bocassi wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 14:49 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 12:59 +, Khem
On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 14:49 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 12:59 +, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Latest upgrade to 249 broke a working build on musl, this is incremental
> > fix to exisiting patches adapted to 249 release
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
> > Cc: Luca Boccassi
> >
On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 12:59 +, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> Latest upgrade to 249 broke a working build on musl, this is incremental
> fix to exisiting patches adapted to 249 release
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
> Cc: Luca Boccassi
> ---
> ...002-don-t-use-glibc-specific-qsort_r.patch | 24 +--
>
FYI: This introduces new build failure with ld-is-gold in DISTRO_FEATURES:
| [17/21] Generating linuxx64.elf.stub with a custom command
| FAILED: src/boot/efi/linuxx64.elf.stub
|
This adds three examples previously located in the yocto-docs
repository (under documentation/ref-manual/examples).
The examples were not used for building the documentation
so it's better to keep them here where they can automatically be
tested.
Fixed the "hello-single" to add a version number
Hi,
Does this mean we have musl and systemd working together?
Regards,
Robert
On 27/07/2021 23:13, Khem Raj wrote:
Latest upgrade to 249 broke a working build on musl, this is incremental
fix to exisiting patches adapted to 249 release
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
Cc: Luca Boccassi
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 22:16:41 +0200 Seebs wrote
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:36:22 +0200
> "Damian Wrobel" wrote:
>
> > Do I correctly assume that pseudo_client_op() has to be fully
> > reentrant?
>
> No. It's never been even a tiny bit reentrant. We used to do the
> allocate
zstd uses 'zstandard' in NVD database. e.g. CVE-2021-24031
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi
---
meta/recipes-extended/zstd/zstd_1.5.0.bb | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/zstd/zstd_1.5.0.bb
b/meta/recipes-extended/zstd/zstd_1.5.0.bb
index 3786058731..978812fddb
--- 9.16.19 released ---
5671. [bug] A race condition could occur where two threads were
competing for the same set of key file locks, leading to
a deadlock. This has been fixed. [GL #2786]
5670. [bug]
4.3 (2021-07-22)
decode-dimms: Attempt to decode LPDDR3 modules
eeprom, eepromer: Removed the tools in favor of eeprog
i2cdetect: Sort the bus list by number
Signed-off-by: Wang Mingyu
---
.../i2c-tools/{i2c-tools_4.2.bb => i2c-tools_4.3.bb}| 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
Signed-off-by: Wang Mingyu
---
.../diffoscope/{diffoscope_177.bb => diffoscope_178.bb} | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
rename meta/recipes-support/diffoscope/{diffoscope_177.bb =>
diffoscope_178.bb} (92%)
diff --git
Backport patches to fix CVE-2020-13529.
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi
---
...heck-error-earlier-and-reduce-indent.patch | 172 ++
...02-sd-dhcp-client-shorten-code-a-bit.patch | 66 +++
...ogs-when-dhcp-client-unexpectedly-ga.patch | 69 +++
22 matches
Mail list logo
