Ping again.
Thank you,
Andrii
On 04/12/2018 05:42 PM, Andrii Bordunov wrote:
Another ping.
Any comments? Or could it be just applied as is?
Thank you,
Andrii
On 03/13/2018 07:25 PM, Andrii Bordunov wrote:
Ping
Rebased patch to latest master.
Regarding special value for the variable, it
Another ping.
Any comments? Or could it be just applied as is?
Thank you,
Andrii
On 03/13/2018 07:25 PM, Andrii Bordunov wrote:
Ping
Rebased patch to latest master.
Regarding special value for the variable, it could be done with
PRIVATE_LIBS to mean all libraries, I think. PRIVATE_LIBS
.
Thank you,
Andrii
On 03/16/2017 05:07 PM, Andrii Bordunov wrote:
Hi Richard,
Sorry, my Python knowledge is quite basic. I'm sure it's possible to
have a (global?) EXCLUDE_FROM_SHLIBS list holding subpackage names, but
how it could lead to performance improvement? It would also need s
Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 20:02 +0300, Andrii Bordunov wrote:
Some packages containing shared libraries might be registered
as shlib providers when they shouldn't (for example, the lib is for
their private use and must not generate any dependency).
EXCLUDE_FROM_SHLIBS is targeted at th
Ping-2. Guys? Anything?
Thank you,
Andrii
On 19.10.16 16:58, Andrii Bordunov wrote:
Ping? Any comments?
Thank you,
Andrii
On 10.10.16 20:02, Andrii Bordunov wrote:
Some packages containing shared libraries might be registered
as shlib providers when they shouldn't (for example, th
Ping? Any comments?
Thank you,
Andrii
On 10.10.16 20:02, Andrii Bordunov wrote:
Some packages containing shared libraries might be registered
as shlib providers when they shouldn't (for example, the lib is for
their private use and must not generate any dependency).
EXCLUDE_FROM_SHLI
pands EXCLUDE_FROM_SHLIBS usage, so now it's possible
to set it in a style similar with RDEPENDS. For example:
EXCLUDE_FROM_SHLIBS_${PN}-ptest = "1"
Signed-off-by: Andrii Bordunov
---
meta/classes/package.bbclass | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
