From: Esben Haabendal
When building musl with a pure LLVM toolchain, we need compiler-rt instead of
libgcc-initial.
Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal
---
meta/recipes-core/musl/musl_git.bb | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl_git.bb
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 12:52 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
Options
===
a) We could introduce some kind of suffix variable ${PKGSFX} which would
contain the variant, maybe in conjuction with BPN instead of PN:
PACKAGES = ${BPN}${PKGSFX} ${BPN}-dev${PKGSFX}
FILES_${BPN}-dev${PKGSFX} = x
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled.
Does this make sense to
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:21 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
I actually believe the core in OE is well suited
Hatle, Mark mark.ha...@windriver.com writes:
On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule
