b
> 3) test it
>
> Steve
>
>
>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
>> wrote:
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> thanks for the reply.
>>
>> The problem is that I need to force a patch application (like patch --force
>> optio
#x27;s really what you want to
> do). I guess I would ask "why?" and if it were me I'd just reroll the
> patch and fix it. But I don't know what the real problem is, so...
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli <
>
Hi All,
please can I know if is it possible, using the do_patch routine,
to force the application of a given patch?
I mean, like the patch --force command.
Please let me know, I tried w/o good result.
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
--
___
Openembedded-core ma
r the support,
Cheers.
Giuseppe
2013/7/24 Stanacar, StefanX
>
>
> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 11:43 +0200, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > I saw it early this morning (reading the previous thread)
> > but I've not put it in the right attention I
the make
issue?
Many thanks,
Cheers.
Giuseppe
2013/7/24 Paul Barker
> On 24 July 2013 09:47, Giuseppe Condorelli
> wrote:
> > Many thanks for the quick reply Stefan,
> >
> > For completion, I'm working on FC16.
> > Indeed (before sending the mail) I tried downloa
2013-07-24 at 09:33 +0200, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > given that the make v. 3.82 is broken, as the sanity check highlights,
> > which is the best solution
> > to allow Fedora users (as I am) to go ahead with the build?
> > I don'
Hi All,
given that the make v. 3.82 is broken, as the sanity check highlights,
which is the best solution
to allow Fedora users (as I am) to go ahead with the build?
I don't like to avoid sanity checks or to use an older version of
sanity.bbclass.
Please let me know, currently this issue is blocki
enembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=6acd444a557bba977ae1772371fdadf5f510e3b6>,
which indicates the new 1.19.1 version.
Thanks,
Giuseppe
2013/6/25 Giuseppe Condorelli
> Hi All,
>
> I'm working with the best so far master openembedded-core repository plus
> the bitbake version 1.19.1
Hi All,
I'm working with the best so far master openembedded-core repository plus
the bitbake version 1.19.1
Using the external toolchain csl I'm in trouble because it seems the latest
modification in the csl-versions.inc
breaks the csl_get_version routine. I mean, it is not able to find the gcc
v
Whats about ifcfg and rtpr contained in ip dir?
From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: mercoledì 27 marzo 2013 15:48
To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; p...@pbcl.net
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] iproute2: add bash runtime dependence
On
[mailto:cristian.io...@intel.com]
Sent: mercoledì 27 marzo 2013 15:25
To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
p...@pbcl.net; raj.k...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [OE-core] [PATCH] iproute2: add bash runtime dependence
Hello,
Are the three bash scripts related to iproute base
tried to install iproute2, previously packaged
as rpm.
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
From: Giuseppe Condorelli [mailto:giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com]
Sent: mercoledì 27 marzo 2013 10:14
To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI
Subject: Fwd: [OE-core] [PATCH] iproute2: add bash runtime dependence
Add bash runtime dependence, required at package install time.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli
---
meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc|1 +
.../iproute2/iproute2_3.8.0.bb |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta
any thanks for having remembered me that stuff.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
>
> Sau!
>
>
>
>
> On 02/14/2013 08:44 AM, Giuseppe CONDORELLI wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> due to local company restrictions, I cannot clone external git repository.
>> During prelink-native f
Hi,
due to local company restrictions, I cannot clone external git repository.
During prelink-native fetch I catch the warning about that (given that the
SRC_URI point to git) but then,
trying other mirrors, system is able to download a tar.gz of the prelink.
The strange thing is that however bitb
Hi All,
Today I pulled changes in local from OE-Core master repository.
Running a build I'm failing because bitbake 1.71.1 is requested and I've the
1.17.0 instead.
The tar file is not yet available looking at the openemebedded site.
Do I have to clone also bitbake to have the bsf sources? Honestl
Well done Marcin,
I've just met this issue working with my local external-toolchain and I had
to
locally patch the same .inc for checking. :)
Thanks for having highlighted that in the mailing list.
Regards,
Giuseppe
>-Original Message-
>From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.
However, what about the resultant libraries as well as libsotruss?
Do we have to also to remove them from file inclusion to avoid warnings?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
>-Original Message-
>From: Giuseppe Condorelli [mailto:giuseppe.condore...@st.com]
>Sent: venerdì 25 gennaio 2013
From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com]
Sent: venerdì 18 gennaio 2013 09:55
To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI
Cc: Giuseppe Condorelli; Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: fix as and ld check in libc dir
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:32
ennaio 2013 18:28
>To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI
>Cc: 'Giuseppe Condorelli'; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: fix as and ld check in libc dir
>
>On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 05:59:00PM +0100, Giuseppe CONDORELLI wrote:
>>
>>
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com]
>Sent: giovedì 17 gennaio 2013 14:46
>To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI
>Cc: 'Giuseppe Condorelli'; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: fix as and ld chec
Hi Martin,
Do you mean applying the patch you highlighted in libc/configure?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com]
>Sent: giovedì 17 gennaio 2013 13:42
>To: Giuseppe Condorelli
>Cc: Giuseppe CONDORELLI; op
Fix routine to check as and ld version check in the configure, to allow system
to correctly check for version 2.1x.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli
---
.../eglibc-2.16_fix_as_ld_ver_check.patch | 23
meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.16.bb|1
2013/1/16 Martin Jansa
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:14:07PM +0100, Giuseppe CONDORELLI wrote:
> > Fix routine to check as and ld version check in the configure, to allow
> system
> > to correctly check for version 2.1x.
>
> Does it build with gold now?
>
> http:/
Fix routine to check as and ld version check in the configure, to allow system
to correctly check for version 2.1x.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli
---
.../eglibc-2.16_fix_as_ld_ver_check.patch | 23
meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.16.bb|3
based toolchain (containing the cross-compiler),
able to be installed and used by third part to build
their own target applications.
For sure conceptually I'm missing something.
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
2013/1/8 Richard Purdie
> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 16:12 +0100, Giuseppe Condorelli wrot
Set LINK_SIZE in BUILD_CFLAGS given that the autotools bbclass use it to set
CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD, required for the libpcre build.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli
---
meta/recipes-support/libpcre/libpcre_8.32.bb |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta
Set LINK_SIZE in BUILD_CFLAGS given that the autotools bbclass use it to set
CFLAG_FOR_BUILD, required for the libpcre build.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli
---
meta/recipes-support/libpcre/libpcre_8.32.bb |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta
anage
extrapaths.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.7.inc |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.7.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.7.inc
index 2cfbf99..378caf0 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtool
my file in the SRC_URI list.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/12/19 Paul Eggleton
> On Monday 17 December 2012 14:51:59 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > 2012/12/14 Robert P. J. Day
> >
> > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > > > 2012/12/14 Robert P. J.
2012/12/14 Robert P. J. Day
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > 2012/12/14 Robert P. J. Day
> > On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Marko Katić wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:41 +0100, Gi
2012/12/14 Robert P. J. Day
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Marko Katić wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:41 +0100, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I've seen that, in the given .inc file, the FILESPATH is statically
> > > se
heers,
Giuseppe
2012/11/7 Giuseppe Condorelli
> Hi All,
>
> building for mips32, uclibc build failed with
>
> libc/sysdeps/linux/common/getppid.c:14:1: error: expected expression
> before '=' token
>
> Has someone met the same issue?
>
Hi All,
building for mips32, uclibc build failed with
libc/sysdeps/linux/common/getppid.c:14:1: error: expected expression before
'=' token
Has someone met the same issue?
Please let me know.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openemb
tem also
> running uclibc
>
>
> On Friday, October 26, 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli <
> giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I need to build sdk using uclibc.
> > I'm failing on nativesdk-libc-for-gcc dependence because
> > s
Hi All,
I need to build sdk using uclibc.
I'm failing on nativesdk-libc-for-gcc dependence because
system always finds nativesdk-eglibc as the correct one.
I've set TCLIBC to uclibc and in fact (builind with -DDD) I can
say the default nativesdk is the uclibc, although the eglibc part
will be assi
Well, many thanks Phil for your fast reply.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/10/23 Phil Blundell
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 17:22 +0200, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > I need to enable init applet in the current version of busybox.
> > Do I have to create my own defconfig to pass via
ect: Re: [OE-core] [OE-Core][PATCH] base-files:
do_install_basefilesissue error
To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI < <mailto:giuseppe.condore...@st.com>
giuseppe.condore...@st.com>
Cc: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
On Mon, Oct
ppe CONDORELLI wrote:
> > Fixed error in do_install_basefilesissue, printf is now replaced by echo.
>
> What kind of error?
>
> Doesn't this change have issues about how newlines are handled?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorel
Yes, you are right.
The mistake was in local setting because DISTRO_VERSION was set to
"-${DATE}" and the minus created
the install error.
Locally solved, please discard the patch.
Thanks,
Giuseppe
2012/10/23 Martin Jansa
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 05:32:32PM +0200, Giuseppe CON
Fixed error in do_install_basefilesissue, printf is now replaced by echo.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli
---
meta/recipes-core/base-files/base-files_3.0.14.bb |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/base-files/base-files_3.0.14.bb
b
Fixed error in do_install_basefilesissue, printf is now replaced by echo.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli
---
meta/recipes-core/base-files/base-files_3.0.14.bb |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/base-files/base-files_3.0.14.bb
b
Update: removing ssp from DISTRO_FEATURES solve to build error but
(obviously) remove ssp support
from uclibc package.
Is there a way to avoid this?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/9/7 Giuseppe Condorelli
> This is a forward of the mail erroneously sent only to Khem.
>
>
> -- Forwa
This is a forward of the mail erroneously sent only to Khem.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Giuseppe Condorelli
Date: 2012/9/7
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Cannot find -lssp during uclibc package build
To: Khem Raj
Hi Khem,
many thanks for your reply (see below).
2012/9/7 Khem Raj
Any news?
2012/9/3 Giuseppe Condorelli
> Hi Khem, All
>
> I'm building an uclibc image using gcc 4.6.3 instead of the 4.7 version
> oe-core provides.
> I'm falling in the following linker error during uClibc package build:
>
> "Cannot find -lssp"
>
Hi Khem, All
I'm building an uclibc image using gcc 4.6.3 instead of the 4.7 version
oe-core provides.
I'm falling in the following linker error during uClibc package build:
"Cannot find -lssp"
Now, ssp support is enabled in the uClibc package and disabled in the
gcc-cross-initial package, so
ld
Many thanks Paul for the clarification.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/8/27 Paul Eggleton
> On Monday 27 August 2012 10:05:15 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > Is there a way to append (in private layer) the .inc files other than the
> > .bb (bbappend)?
>
> You can't - you can on
2012/8/21 Paul Eggleton
> On Tuesday 21 August 2012 15:52:17 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > > > []$ bitbake core-image-minimal
> > > > Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first before the
> > >
> > > main
> > >
> >
2012/8/21 Paul Eggleton
> On Tuesday 21 August 2012 15:15:42 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
Hi Paul,
many thanks for your quick reply.
> > today I restarted to work on my own OE meta layer and, after having
> pulled
> > last two months changes is
Hi All,
although the recipe of the package in subject selects npth for uclibc
systems, the configure script searchs always for
pth. I've created a personal patch to avoid this and to move to npth but
now I can see there are many sources that include pth.h
How can I build gnupg using npth? Creating
I confirm the USE_DEVFS is set to zero by default.
I'll investigate for a solution, thanks.
Giuseppe
2012/6/13 Khem Raj
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
> wrote:
> > Solved right now!
> > I was forced to re-run the oe-init-build-dev script, maybe s
pe
2012/6/13 Khem Raj
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
> wrote:
> > Hi Khem, Mark,
> >
> > I've not changed the location of the local repository since it was
> created
> > months ago.
> > This problem appeared yesterday and I can
Sorry guys, I forgot to reply that I'm using the bitbake 1.15.2.
Have I to update it? Since now I was based on the best so far archive file
for bitbake.
2012/6/12 Khem Raj
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
> wrote:
> > OSError: [Errno 1] Operat
Hi Mark,
many thanks for the explanation.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/6/12 Mark Hatle
> On 6/12/12 2:21 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>> this can be interesting for me. Please can you explain with an example
>> what
>> really this patch does?
>>
e.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/6/12 Mark Hatle
> On 6/12/12 8:57 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
>> wrote:
>>
>>> OSError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted:
>>> '/oelinux/condorg/**openembedded-core/stlinux-3.0
Hi Mark,
this can be interesting for me. Please can you explain with an example what
really this patch does?
Many thanks,
Giuseppe
2012/6/11 Mark Hatle
> Add functionality to RPM to directly query the packageorigin (path) from
> the resolver database, instead of having to do this via an indirec
et me know.
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
2012/6/1 Giuseppe Condorelli
> Hi Khem,
> 2012/6/1 Khem Raj
>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
>> wrote:
>> > Many thanks Khem,
>> >
>> > I've applied your patches to my local reposit
Hi All,
I'm wondering about sdk packaging and installation process.
My question is: is the sdk image installed as for core images?
I mean, core images are installed (as rpm, ipk) and then a tar file is also
provided.
Is sdk process the same?
Please let me know, I'm asking this before investigatin
4 Khem Raj
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
> wrote:
> > Solved,
> > I missed to set TARGET_OS = "eglibc" leaving it to "uclibc", my previous
> > build...
>
> thats wrong. If you are using OE-Core then the variable to set it
Solved,
I missed to set TARGET_OS = "eglibc" leaving it to "uclibc", my previous
build...
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/6/4 Giuseppe Condorelli
> Hi All,
>
> I'm falling in a circular dependency error between libiconv and gettext
> during eglibc build.
> libic
Hi All,
I'm falling in a circular dependency error between libiconv and gettext
during eglibc build.
libiconv (as set in tclibc-eglibc.inc) is set to "eglibc", so the recipe
for libiconv shouldn't be included
in the build list (it inherits gettext and gettext depends on libiconv).
Please can you c
Hi Khem,
2012/6/1 Khem Raj
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
> wrote:
> > Many thanks Khem,
> >
> > I've applied your patches to my local repository.
> > Unfortunately the uclibc setup I'm using doesn't provide support for
&
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
2012/6/1 Khem Raj
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
> wrote:
> > Have new suggestions?
>
> I found a bit of time and fixed rpm compilation on uclibc. Its only
> compiling though I don't know if it will r
;>
>> 2012/5/31 Khem Raj mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com>>
>>
>>
>>On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
>>> <mailto:giuseppe.condorelli@**gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>> Is there some difference for uclibc? Please let m
Thanks for the reply,
unfortunately I depend from rpm, I need just rpm packages.
So can you confirm the target rpm for uclibc is not building?
Thanks again,
Giuseppe
2012/5/31 Khem Raj
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
> wrote:
> > Is there some differenc
2012/5/31 Giuseppe Condorelli
> Hi Khem,
>
> 2012/5/30 Khem Raj
>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
>> wrote:
>> > It fails on undefined reference to xmalloc, xcalloc, etc... that
>> however are
>> > internally
Hi Khem,
2012/5/30 Khem Raj
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
> wrote:
> > It fails on undefined reference to xmalloc, xcalloc, etc... that however
> are
> > internally defined and used as wrapper for real malloc, etc...
> > Please, can somebod
Hi All,
I'm falling in error building rpm-5.4.0 for target.
It fails on undefined reference to xmalloc, xcalloc, etc... that however
are internally defined and used as wrapper for real malloc, etc...
Please, can somebody try to build this package for me?
NOTE: the rpm build inclusion is dued by th
inside the target fs I'll install via oe
system.
How can it help me if I query installed packages from host?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/5/29 Giuseppe Condorelli
> 2012/5/29 Paul Eggleton
>
>> On Tuesday 29 May 2012 15:20:14 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
>> > What I'm not un
2012/5/29 Paul Eggleton
> On Tuesday 29 May 2012 15:20:14 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > What I'm not understanding is how I can invoke my shell function. Do you
> > mean I have to invoke it as append function of populate_rootfs one?
>
> If you aren't including
Hi All,
building the default core-image-minimal image I obtain no error and all
seems to end right.
But if I look at the generated .../tmp/log.do_rootfs file I can see an
error that souds strange to me.
---
Building feeds for
[stlinux]..
./
./lib/
./lib/librt-0.9.32.so
./lib/libusb-1.0.so.0
2012/5/28 Paul Eggleton
> On Monday 28 May 2012 17:30:34 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > Well, I added ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND += "list_installed_packages ; "
> in
> > the image recipe I want to build.
> > Build went right but I don&#
Hi Paul,
first of all many thanks for your quick reply. :)
2012/5/28 Paul Eggleton
> On Monday 28 May 2012 15:14:32 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
> > I need to query, via rpm command, the packages installed building an own
> > image recipe.
> > I know the populate_rootfs ste
Hi All,
I need to query, via rpm command, the packages installed building an own
image recipe.
I know the populate_rootfs step for images uses rpm to install the packages
(if we set PACKAGE_CLASSES).
To do this it sets a dbpath and a root path for installing the packages.
I need to know how to que
Hi All,
just a question about core images rpm installation.
I have understood and verified that if PACKAGE_CLASSES is set to
package_rpm then the rootfs of the image we choose to build is filled with
the installation result of a sort of rpm -U command (accordingly tuned).
So I can think that, a
Hi All,
can I have an help about rpms installation, once they were built by oc-core?
I produced both .tgz and rpms, I'm wondering how to install them (maybe
using chroot, but I'm newbe
about it).
Please, have you suggestions?
Thanks,
Giuseppe
___
Openem
2/5/16 Khem Raj
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 16, 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli <
> giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm catching an error during my personal core-image build at do_package
> stage of libgcc.
> > The libgcc version (4.6.3) I&
Hi All,
I'm catching an error during my personal core-image build at do_package
stage of libgcc.
The libgcc version (4.6.3) I'm using comes from an own layer as well as the
compiler.
In past days I was able to successfully complete the personal core-image
build working against stable oe-core tar f
78 matches
Mail list logo
