Re: [OE-core] openssl: OpenSSL 1.1.x update

While this is not a fully authoritative answer, I believe what your wrote will be correct. Latest 1.0.2 in 2.2. Master (in future) will have both 1.0.2 and 1.1.0. > On Oct 13, 2016, at 12:36, Tan, Raymond wrote: > > Warm Regards, > > Raymond Tan > >>

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libnl: remove RREPLACES and RCONFLICTS for libnl-genl

GK > On Sep 2, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Robert Yang wrote: > > The libnl-genl.rpm provides libnl-genl2 and libnl-genl-3-200: > > $ rpm -qp --provides > tmp/deploy/rpm/core2_64/libnl-genl-3-200-3.2.28-r0.2.core2_64.rpm > elf(buildid) =

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] buildtools-tarball: Change the way the SDK is sanitized

: Monday, June 24, 2013 08:31 AM Pacific Standard Time To: Hatle, Mark Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] buildtools-tarball: Change the way the SDK is sanitized On Monday 24 June 2013 09:47:15 Mark Hatle wrote: + script=${1:-${SDK_OUTPUT}/${SDKPATH

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

Sorry to reply to myself but I forgot one thing.. On Apr 7, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Hatle, Mark mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote: On Apr 7, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Hatle, Mark mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote: I think

Re: [OE-core] [poky] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:29 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:47 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: I think most embedded systems would only use one lib. To take your lib/lib64 example: If I am developing for an embedded system I know whether

Re: [OE-core] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming

A few comments to the original proposal below... On Apr 5, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at least have some