On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 14:41 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 22 May 2013 13:51, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote:
I had thought we had virtual-gconv-ENCODING providers but apparently
that's not the
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 22 May 2013 13:51, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote:
I had thought we had virtual-gconv-ENCODING providers but apparently
that's not the case. So I think the answer at the moment is probably
no. I guess we
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 12:00 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 10 May 2013 11:50, Phil Blundell ph...@brightsign.biz wrote:
Or you could replace the shell wrapper that create_wrapper() currently
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Bogdan Marinescu
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com wrote:
Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to the
latest version.
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com
---
.../flex/flex/avoid-FORTIFY-warnings.patch | 59
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 05/08/2013 06:33 AM, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
'fix_use_of_gcc.patch' was integrated in the main repository.
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com
---
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 05/08/2013 04:59 AM, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
'gdbserver-cflags-last.diff' was integrated into upstream.
Was it really? I note that the patch from Marcin still incorporates a
similar patch, please verify this should
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 05/07/2013 06:00 AM, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
A number of patches are now part of the upstream.
Tested by compiling and running core-image-minimal/qemux86.
This patch is not applying cleaning, please verify it. see
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 15:55 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
# nptl needs libgcc but dlopens it, so our shlibs code doesn't detect
this
-#RDEPENDS_${PN} += ${@['','libgcc']['nptl' in '${GLIBC_ADDONS}']}
+RDEPENDS_${PN} +=
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 05/07/2013 03:34 AM, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com
---
.../mpfr/{mpfr-3.1.1 = mpfr-3.1.2}/long-long-thumb.**patch |0
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 12:08:02PM +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
2013 was added in the 'Copyright' line in LICENSE.txt.
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com
---
...ons-native_2.2.0.bb =
? Is it in the RPM library or we really should not add that first
line to the /etc/rpm/platform file?
Thanks,
Bogdan
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Marinescu, Bogdan A
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com wrote:
Further investigation reveals the fact that the problem is connected to
the value returned
I've sent another patch that attempts to fix the same bug in a different
way ('rpm: change arch scoring items'). Please review it.
Thanks,
Bogdan
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Marinescu, Bogdan A
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com wrote:
I've investigated this issue further. /etc/rpm/platform
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.comwrote:
On 4/18/13 9:27 AM, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
For some platforms (for example emenlow) the RPM installer prefers
an invalid package architecture (for example i586 over core2) because
/etc/rpm/platform is not properly
anything else, I get
a score of 1 for arch core2 and a score of 3 for i586. So that line
definiteley matters, which should be a bug, if I understood Mark's e-mails
correctly.
Thanks,
Bogdan
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Marinescu, Bogdan A
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18
Sorry, hit reply instead of reply to all by mistake.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marinescu, Bogdan A bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com
Date: Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] smart: disable CHANNELSDIR
To: Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com
On Mon, Apr
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 14:58 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
From: Ioana Grigoropol ioanax.grigoro...@intel.com
Why?
Because she is the author of the patch, I've just added a signed-off-by
line.
Sorry, I didn't realize that v1 was already merged. New patch sent.
Thanks,
Bogdan
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:27:37PM +0200, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
---
.../gmp/{gmp-5.1.0 = gmp-5.1.0a}/187b7b1646ee.patch
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 13:53 +0200, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to the
latest version.
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu
Resending.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Bogdan Marinescu
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com
---
.../{python-dbus_1.1.0.bb = python-dbus_1.1.1.bb} |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename
Resending to list (hit reply instead of reply all by mistake).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marinescu, Bogdan A bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com
Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] autoconf: updated to 2.69
To: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com
On Fri
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is recipe renamed
Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to 3.4.3 ?
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012, Bogdan Marinescu bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com
wrote:
Tested by building core-image-sato-sdk.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is recipe renamed
Wasn't I supposed to do that when
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:23 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:25 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations
(which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 08:33 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com wrote:
I was able to build strace 4.7 with uclibc succesfully, but I'm unable
to build an uclibc image (even core-image-minimal) to do
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Bogdan Marinescu
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com wrote:
new version doesn't seem to use sigmask anymore.
You have to build it on uclibc to see if you can drop this patch or not.
I was able to
Apologies for the double From: line, will resend.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Bogdan Marinescu
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com wrote:
From: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
From: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
Otherwise it assumes / as sysroot on build host and starts
searching for directories
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Bogdan Marinescu
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com wrote:
new version doesn't seem to use sigmask anymore.
You have to build it on uclibc to see if you can drop this patch or not.
Thanks for
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tuesday 12 June 2012 18:13:35 Marinescu, Bogdan A wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
You have to build it on uclibc to see if you can drop this patch
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:05:24PM +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
Tested by compiling lighttpd
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com
---
.../libpcre/{libpcre_8.21.bb = libpcre_8.30.bb} | 10
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 05/22/2012 03:20 AM, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
Tested with 'lttv' on core-image-lsb.
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescubogdan.a.marine...@intel.com
---
.../{lttng2-ust_1.9.4.bb = lttng2-ust_2.0.2.bb} | 8
32 matches
Mail list logo
