On 5/3/24 11:18, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> When using multiple u-boot configurations in UBOOT_CONFIG, the helper
> function uboot_assemble_fitimage_helper() was not called with all
> combinations of type & binary, due to a copy-n-paste indexing error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ralph Siemsen
> ---
>
On 11/9/22 18:07, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/11/2022 13:54:18-0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> > That would result in a lot of messages on the mailing list and ends up
>> > being a lot of work for the maintainers as well.
>>
>> If you use a tool like b4 [1] it can automatically
On 11/1/22 14:02, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> [You don't often get email from alex.kana...@gmail.com. Learn why this is
> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 18:54, Sean Anderson via lists.openembedded.org
> wrote:
>> If y
On 11/1/22 13:44, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 13:40 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 11/1/22 13:29, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 12:14 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> > > On 10/28/22 11:37, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> > > > On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 11:29 -0400, Sean
On 11/1/22 13:29, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 12:14 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 10/28/22 11:37, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 11:29 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> > > On 10/28/22 11:09, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> > > > On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 13:21 -0400,
On 10/28/22 11:37, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 11:29 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 10/28/22 11:09, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 13:21 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> > > As noted in the cover letter, I ran
>> > >
>> > > oe-selftest -r
On 10/28/22 11:09, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 13:21 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 10/26/22 13:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 12:49 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 10/26/22 10:08, Richard Purdie wrote:
This looks like a pretty nice improvement, I've been
On 10/26/22 13:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 12:49 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 10/26/22 10:08, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> > This looks like a pretty nice improvement, I've been worried about how
>> > entangled all this was becoming. Is there anything better we could do
>> >
On 10/26/22 10:08, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 19:37 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> The U-Boot signing code is a bit of a mess. The problem is that mkimage
>> determines the public keys to embed into a device tree based on an image
>> that it is signing. This results in all sorts
The U-Boot signing code is a bit of a mess. The problem is that mkimage
determines the public keys to embed into a device tree based on an image
that it is signing. This results in all sorts of contortions: U-Boot has to
be available to the kernel recipe so that it can have the correct public
keys
In preparation for the next commit, split off several
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
meta/classes-recipe/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 25 +
meta/classes-recipe/uboot-config.bbclass| 3 +++
meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass | 19
3 files
uboot_fitimage_assemble is called from one place with the same
arguments. Instead of using shell variables as intermediaries, simplify
the function by using the bitbake variables directly. Removing a layer
of indirection makes it easier to determine what values are being
substituted in. Some
We have a specific variable for the path to the boot directory. Use it
instead of open-coding this path.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
meta/classes-recipe/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
This series reworks the uboot-sign and kernel-fitimage classes to cut their
intertwining web of dependencies. We do this by signing the kernel image
twice: once for real, and once to embed the keys into U-Boot's dtb. This
cuts two of the dependencies between U-Boot and Linux's recipes, and
moves
When generating our SPL-verifying certificate, we use FIT_KEY_REQ_ARGS,
which is intended for the U-Boot-verifying certificate. Instead, use
UBOOT_FIT_KEY_REQ_ARGS.
Fixes: 0e6b0fefa0 ("u-boot: Use a different Key for SPL signing")
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
Replacing sysroot_stage_all by a no-op recipe makes it difficult for
bbappends to stage files intentionally. Instead, just clear
SYSROOT_DIRS, allowing other bbappends to easily add new directories.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
meta/classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1
On 10/7/22 3:23 AM, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> [You don't often get email from michael.opdenac...@bootlin.com. Learn why
> this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> Hi Sean
>
> On 06.10.22 23:03, Sean Anderson via lists.openembedded.org wrote
On 10/6/22 5:02 PM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> I noticed the following warning from systemd-tmpfiles while booting:
>
> /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/dbus.conf:13: Line references path below legacy
> directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/dbus/containers
>
> The offending line [1] is
>
> d
I noticed the following warning from systemd-tmpfiles while booting:
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/dbus.conf:13: Line references path below legacy
directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/dbus/containers
The offending line [1] is
d @EXPANDED_RUNSTATEDIR@/dbus/containers 0755 @DBUS_USER@ - - -
We
Hi Luca,
On 6/1/22 3:13 AM, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> [You don't often get email from luca.ceres...@bootlin.com. Learn why this is
> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.]
>
> Hi Sean,
>
> Il giorno Tue, 31 May 2022 11:10:52 -0400
> "Sean Anderson
With CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS_ZSTD enabled, kernel modules will have a
.ko.zst extension. This fixes depmod not being run.
Fixes: 1b696a45ddb ("rootfs.py: Add check for kernel modules before running
depmod")
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
meta/lib/oe/rootfs.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
In order to build erofs filesystems, wic must have the erofs-utils
package installed into its sysroot.
Fixes: 30375ce97 ("Add support for erofs filesystems")
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
meta/classes/image_types_wic.bbclass | 2 +-
meta/recipes-core/meta/wic-tools.bb | 2 +-
On 4/5/22 11:02 AM, Mittal, Anuj wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 15:49 -0500, Sean Anderson via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>> libpcap looks for DPDK in the same way it looks for DAG. This can
>> poison
>> the build even if it doesn't find anything. Explicitly disabl
On 4/5/22 11:02 AM, Mittal, Anuj wrote:
> [You don't often get email from anuj.mit...@intel.com. Learn why this is
> important at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.]
>
> On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 15:49 -0500, Sean Anderson via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>> l
The condition for calling install_spl_helper when compiling multiple
configs does not match the condition for a single config. This causes
compilation failures when ${UBOOT_FITIMAGE_ENABLE} is 1 but
${SPL_SIGN_ENABLE} is not.
Fixes: 5af4dfe83c2 ("u-boot: Add infrastructure to SPL verified boot")
On 2/10/22 3:49 PM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> libpcap looks for DPDK in the same way it looks for DAG. This can poison
> the build even if it doesn't find anything. Explicitly disable dpdk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
> ---
>
> meta/recipes-connectivity/libpcap/libpcap_1.10.1.bb | 3 ++-
>
libpcap looks for DPDK in the same way it looks for DAG. This can poison
the build even if it doesn't find anything. Explicitly disable dpdk.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
meta/recipes-connectivity/libpcap/libpcap_1.10.1.bb | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
27 matches
Mail list logo
