Re: [OE-core] Using boost-program-options and native

2017-04-13 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
Am Donnerstag, den 13.04.2017, 08:53 +0200 schrieb Phil Wise: > On 13.04.2017 08:34, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 13:47 +, thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com wrote: > > > I want to build a tool which makes use of boost-program-options lib. As >

[OE-core] Using boost-program-options and native

2017-04-12 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
Hey all! I want to build a tool which makes use of boost-program-options lib. As long as I compile for the target, all is fine, but when I add > BBCLASSEXTEND += "native" to my recipe, I a bitbake error "Nothing Provides" ... :( > ERROR: Required build target 'mytool-native' has no buildable

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] added recipe for libdbus-c++

2016-11-15 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
Am Dienstag, den 15.11.2016, 14:23 + schrieb Burton, Ross: > > On 15 November 2016 at 13:46, Thilo Cestonaro > <thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Thilo Cestonaro <thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com> > > > > As Alex said, p

Re: [OE-core] libdbus-c++

2016-11-14 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
Am Montag, den 14.11.2016, 10:53 + schrieb Burton, Ross: > > On 14 November 2016 at 10:33, thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com > <thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > I wanted to build an executable using libdbus-c++ but OE-Core has no recipe > > providing lib

[OE-core] libdbus-c++

2016-11-14 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
Hey! I wanted to build an executable using libdbus-c++ but OE-Core has no recipe providing libdbus-c++, please correct me if I'm wrong here! Is there a reason, other than no one wanted a recipe for libdbus-c++ yet, against the usage of dbus-c++ implementation or why isn't there a recipe for

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-qt for specific image

2016-10-25 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
> Yes, `bitbake ` does only build your image and `bitbake > -c populate_sdk` does only build the SDK.  > Then I will give it a try! Thanks! Cheers, Thilo smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list

Re: [OE-core] Howto find the providing recipe for a specific package?

2016-10-25 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
> $ oe-pkgdata-util lookup-recipe kernel-module-xfrm6-mode-transport > Thanks! That is what I was looking for! Cheers, Thilo smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list

[OE-core] Howto find the providing recipe for a specific package?

2016-10-25 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
Hey! How can I programmatically reverse lookup the recipe which provides a specific package? e.g. kernel-module-xfrm6-mode-transport is produced via the recipe linux-mainline, in my case, but the packagename doesn't tell this anyhow. Is there a way to get the recipe? Cheers, Thilo smime.p7s

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-qt for specific image

2016-10-25 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
Hey > Well, have your image `inherit populate_sdk_qt5`, and then call > > `bitbake -c populate_sdk`. That'll give you the standard, > image-based SDK, with Qt5 in it. > Can the image and the sdk be build seperatly then? Or will a "bitbake " build the qt5 toolchain directly too? This is what I

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-qt for specific image

2016-10-20 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
> > what is the advantage of such a recipe? The only "advantage" what made me using such a recipe was, that I want to have the normal toolchain AND the qt5 toolchain in one installation package together. When you know another way to get both together, I would be thankful if you tell me how to

[OE-core] meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-qt for specific image

2016-10-19 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
Hey! I want to create such a nice toolchain installation package for my image recipe. The problem I currently hit is, that I need to do populate_sdk and populate_sdk_qt5 to have qt5 toolchain too. Now I had an idea to create a recipe for the SDK like: -- SUMMARY = "Meta package for

Re: [OE-core] Building for armv7athf-neon but toolchain is softfp

2016-07-28 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
at 07:11 +, thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com wrote: > On Mi, 2016-07-27 at 08:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 27, 2016, at 5:14 AM, thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com wrote: > > > > > > Hey Khem, > > > > >

Re: [OE-core] Building for armv7athf-neon but toolchain is softfp

2016-07-28 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
On Mi, 2016-07-27 at 08:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On Jul 27, 2016, at 5:14 AM, thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com wrote: > > > > Hey Khem, > > > > I figured, when I do the compile in 2 steps, so compile then link and > > change the link command

Re: [OE-core] Building for armv7athf-neon but toolchain is softfp

2016-07-27 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
: > > > > On Jul 26, 2016, at 2:39 AM, thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com wrote: > > > > Hey Khem, > > > > > > > > Seems steps are all ok. Can you upload your hello world somewhere. > > http://thilo.cestona.ro/~ephraim/public/helloworld.

Re: [OE-core] Building for armv7athf-neon but toolchain is softfp

2016-07-27 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
d. Cheers, Thilo On Mi, 2016-07-27 at 02:57 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On Jul 26, 2016, at 2:39 AM, thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com wrote: > > > > Hey Khem, > > > > > > > > Seems steps are all ok. Can you upload your hello world somewhere.

Re: [OE-core] Building for armv7athf-neon but toolchain is softfp

2016-07-26 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
Hey Khem, > Seems steps are all ok. Can you upload your hello world somewhere. http://thilo.cestona.ro/~ephraim/public/helloworld.zip Hope you can find out whats going on here :). Cheers, Thilo smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature --

Re: [OE-core] Building for armv7athf-neon but toolchain is softfp

2016-07-25 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
Hey Khem! Thanks for your answer! > >  > > I want to build my own dist and a sdk for it. The dist is working and is as > > expected by the DEFAULT_TUNE of "armv7athf-neon", hardfp. > > > > But the TARGET_SYS in the bitbake header always tells me, that the > > toolchain it uses is

[OE-core] Building for armv7athf-neon but toolchain is softfp

2016-07-22 Thread thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com
Hey all! Hopefully this is no dumb question but I can't find any solution currently. I want to build my own dist and a sdk for it. The dist is working and is as expected by the DEFAULT_TUNE of "armv7athf-neon", hardfp. But the TARGET_SYS in the bitbake header always tells me, that the