From: Trevor Gamblin <tgamb...@baylibre.com>

The eagain patch is currently using G_IO_ERROR_BUSY as part of the check
to retry when the simul_read_thread test fails during ptests, but the
actual error code is 27, which corresponds to G_IO_ERROR_WOULD_BLOCK.
Change the check so that it looks for the right code.

Signed-off-by: Trevor Gamblin <tgamb...@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8574fb1371e2d83c1c7ee58067c50319a62a22ea)
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <st...@sakoman.com>
---
 meta/recipes-core/glib-networking/glib-networking/eagain.patch | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glib-networking/glib-networking/eagain.patch 
b/meta/recipes-core/glib-networking/glib-networking/eagain.patch
index ac6592ffef..ee5b6a7beb 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/glib-networking/glib-networking/eagain.patch
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/glib-networking/glib-networking/eagain.patch
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Index: glib-networking-2.74.0/tls/tests/connection.c
                                     MIN (TEST_DATA_LENGTH / 2, 
TEST_DATA_LENGTH - test->nread),
                                     NULL, &error);
 +
-+      if (g_error_matches (error, G_IO_ERROR, G_IO_ERROR_BUSY))
++      if (g_error_matches (error, G_IO_ERROR, G_IO_ERROR_WOULD_BLOCK))
 +          continue;
 +
        g_assert_no_error (error);
-- 
2.34.1

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#183853): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/183853
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99948855/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to