Re: [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH 1/2] iputils: splitting the ping6 as a package

Hi Steve On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 7:26 AM Steve Sakoman via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > I'm hesitant to take a packaging change in a stable branch. If others > would like to weigh in on this please speak up! > I look at this change as a bug fix for iputils to reflect the UI change they hav

Re: [OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH 1/2] iputils: splitting the ping6 as a package

I'm hesitant to take a packaging change in a stable branch. If others would like to weigh in on this please speak up! Steve On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 12:24 AM Bin Lan via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > From: Xiangyu Chen > > The iputils merged the ping4 and ping6 command into the ping since t

[OE-core][scarthgap][PATCH 1/2] iputils: splitting the ping6 as a package

From: Xiangyu Chen The iputils merged the ping4 and ping6 command into the ping since the commit ebad35fe[1], currently, iputils ping support being called using "ping -6" or "ping6" symlinks. In oe-core, there are two packages provide ipv6 ping, inetutils and iputils, the inetutils-ping6 doesn't