On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:35 AM Alex Kiernan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:07 PM Andre McCurdy wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 4:48 AM Alex Kiernan wrote:
> > >
> > > Let me have a look at that - what got me here was trying to get a
> > > static busybox so I could OSTree's tests
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:07 PM Andre McCurdy wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 4:48 AM Alex Kiernan wrote:
> >
> > Let me have a look at that - what got me here was trying to get a
> > static busybox so I could OSTree's tests to pass, which all turned out
> > to be way harder than I expected;
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 4:48 AM Alex Kiernan wrote:
>
> Let me have a look at that - what got me here was trying to get a
> static busybox so I could OSTree's tests to pass, which all turned out
> to be way harder than I expected; this was just one of the things I
> tripped over.
Busybox
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:02 PM Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 07:19 +, Alex Kiernan wrote:
> > Whilst glibc builds static binaries libxcrypt doesn't, without which
> > we
> > can't build, for example, a static busybox. Enable static libraries
> > here
> > so that anyone who
On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 07:19 +, Alex Kiernan wrote:
> Whilst glibc builds static binaries libxcrypt doesn't, without which
> we
> can't build, for example, a static busybox. Enable static libraries
> here
> so that anyone who needs a static binary using just basic libraries
> has
> one fewer
Whilst glibc builds static binaries libxcrypt doesn't, without which we
can't build, for example, a static busybox. Enable static libraries here
so that anyone who needs a static binary using just basic libraries has
one fewer dependencies to track down post libxcrypt being split out of
glibc.
