On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 13 November 2014 20:23, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
>>
>> > Personally I'd prefer to see a working Python 3.4 integrated in one go
>> > instead of having a broken 3.4 integrated for an unknown about of time.
>> > Hopefully anyone else who is
On 13 November 2014 20:23, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> > Personally I'd prefer to see a working Python 3.4 integrated in one go
> > instead of having a broken 3.4 integrated for an unknown about of time.
> > Hopefully anyone else who is interested in 3.4 can step up and work on
> the
> > outstandin
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Hi Artur,
>
> On 12 November 2014 22:55, wrobell wrote:
>>
>> Replace Python 3.3.x with Python 3.4.2 (bug #6857)
>
>
> This patch has long lines so didn't survive SMTP, can you push it to a git
> repository somewhere?
I have attached it to b
Hi Artur,
On 12 November 2014 22:55, wrobell wrote:
> Replace Python 3.3.x with Python 3.4.2 (bug #6857)
>
This patch has long lines so didn't survive SMTP, can you push it to a git
repository somewhere?
> Despite further work needed, I hope this patch can be merged, so further
>
work on Pyth
From: Artur Wroblewski
Replace Python 3.3.x with Python 3.4.2 (bug #6857)
This also fixes issue with missing basic Python 3.x modules, see
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6831
The text of the license changed a little, it contains new dates.
This change enables Python 3.4
