On 24 February 2017 at 20:54, Martin Jansa wrote:
> and I was pinging Ross about it few days ago as well, hopefully it will be
> included before pyro is branched.
>
It's in the current MUT, don't worry! :)
Ross
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
O
This was already sent to ML 2 weeks ago:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2017-February/132584.html
discussed few times since it was upgraded
and I was pinging Ross about it few days ago as well, hopefully it will be
included before pyro is branched.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017
This reverts commit 3632abd01abb8dfff230e18f828af705da488f97.
The commit upgraded flex and changed the way it was constructed. There
is a problem with either the upgrade or changes in construction mechanism
resulting in problems similar to:
../cil/src/cil_lexer.lo: In function `cil_lexer_setup':
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:13:08PM -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>> This reverts commit 3632abd01abb8dfff230e18f828af705da488f97.
>>
>> Multiple people have expressed issues with flex-2.6.2; personally I had
>> problems compiling libsepol from
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:13:08PM -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> This reverts commit 3632abd01abb8dfff230e18f828af705da488f97.
>
> Multiple people have expressed issues with flex-2.6.2; personally I had
> problems compiling libsepol from meta-selinux (for libselinux). I tried
> upgrading to flex-
This reverts commit 3632abd01abb8dfff230e18f828af705da488f97.
Multiple people have expressed issues with flex-2.6.2; personally I had
problems compiling libsepol from meta-selinux (for libselinux). I tried
upgrading to flex-2.6.3, but that caused binutils-cross_2.27 to fail.
The simplest for now
