On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 2:16 PM Rasmus Villemoes via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
> On 19/04/2024 23.00, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> > This was already proposed, and rejected.
> > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/topic/104753355
> >
> > You need to fix the metadata that refers
On 19/04/2024 23.00, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> This was already proposed, and rejected.
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/topic/104753355
>
> You need to fix the metadata that refers to the old name.
So, how can a layer then be compatible with both nanbield and scarthgap?
This was already proposed, and rejected.
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/topic/104753355
You need to fix the metadata that refers to the old name.
Alex
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 22:31, Rasmus Villemoes via
lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
>
> From: Rasmus Villemoes
>
> This is
From: Rasmus Villemoes
This is very often a build dependency, such as in my case using a
class from meta-ptx, which fails with
ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'bmap-tools-native'. Close matches:
bmaptool-native
bpftool-native
mtools-native
due to the renaming.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes
