On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 20:56 +0100, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2021, at 23:53, Khem Raj wrote:
> > With commit dc778c70449ee5401b5a24ad18b22b88338c47c5, dependency was
> > moved to openssl-bin which in itself was a fine change, but dropping
> > dependency on openssl too should have been
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021, at 23:53, Khem Raj wrote:
> With commit dc778c70449ee5401b5a24ad18b22b88338c47c5, dependency was
> moved to openssl-bin which in itself was a fine change, but dropping
> dependency on openssl too should have been kept along, dropping this
> meant that openssl binary wont be
On 4/18/21 11:40 PM, mikko.rap...@bmw.de wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 03:53:10PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
With commit dc778c70449ee5401b5a24ad18b22b88338c47c5, dependency was
moved to openssl-bin which in itself was a fine change, but dropping
dependency on openssl too should have been
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 03:53:10PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> With commit dc778c70449ee5401b5a24ad18b22b88338c47c5, dependency was
> moved to openssl-bin which in itself was a fine change, but dropping
> dependency on openssl too should have been kept along, dropping this
> meant that openssl
With commit dc778c70449ee5401b5a24ad18b22b88338c47c5, dependency was
moved to openssl-bin which in itself was a fine change, but dropping
dependency on openssl too should have been kept along, dropping this
meant that openssl binary wont be able to validate secure connections as
the CApath files
