Ok, I will re-do the patch and send it over
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 16:31 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On 14-08-25 17:57:47, Benjamin Esquivel wrote:
> > To Khem and Andreas,
> >
> > I would say that the proposed patch is based on the existing design, a
> > corner case was found and it deserves a fix
On 14-08-25 17:57:47, Benjamin Esquivel wrote:
> To Khem and Andreas,
>
> I would say that the proposed patch is based on the existing design, a
> corner case was found and it deserves a fix but not so sure about
> redesigning it
>
> By redesign I mean to modify also the part where the string is
To Khem and Andreas,
I would say that the proposed patch is based on the existing design, a
corner case was found and it deserves a fix but not so sure about
redesigning it
By redesign I mean to modify also the part where the string is thrown
into the conftest.c
Please let me know your thoughts
On 14-08-24 21:58:11, Benjamin Esquivel wrote:
> The pre-processed output of conftest.c contains an include dir
> and if the path of it contains a 'yes' it will cause some variables
> to be wrongly set to yes because of the way it greps for it.
> Fix is to egrep for yes$ instead.
> This has to be d
The pre-processed output of conftest.c contains an include dir
and if the path of it contains a 'yes' it will cause some variables
to be wrongly set to yes because of the way it greps for it.
Fix is to egrep for yes$ instead.
This has to be done at the configure and the configure.ac files given
the
