On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 11:55 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 20:00, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > Do you know why we wouldn't see this issue on the autobuilder tests?
> >
> > Also, do you plan to submit something upstream? Has this been discussed with
> > them? I'm starting
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 20:00, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Do you know why we wouldn't see this issue on the autobuilder tests?
>
> Also, do you plan to submit something upstream? Has this been discussed
> with
> them? I'm starting to become reluctant to taking pat
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 07:09 -0700, Oleksiy Obitotskyy via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
> Checksum depends on options that could be
> different from build to build, e.g. absolute patch.
> Remove checksum-options from
> executable checksum calculation.
>
> Change-Id: Ifa184febecd2d517826beee784ca5a
Checksum depends on options that could be
different from build to build, e.g. absolute patch.
Remove checksum-options from
executable checksum calculation.
Change-Id: Ifa184febecd2d517826beee784ca5ac7a1fb17fe
Signed-off-by: Oleksiy Obitotskyy
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-11.2.inc|
