[OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3

2016-08-17 Thread Wang Xin
Upgrade gdk-pixbuf from 2.34.0 to 2.35.3. Signed-off-by: Wang Xin --- .../gdk-pixbuf/{gdk-pixbuf_2.34.0.bb => gdk-pixbuf_2.35.3.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/{gdk-pixbuf_2.34.0.bb => gdk-pixbuf_2.35.3.bb} (96%) diff

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3

2016-08-18 Thread Burton, Ross
On 18 August 2016 at 06:48, Wang Xin wrote: > Upgrade gdk-pixbuf from 2.34.0 to 2.35.3. > 2.35.x is a development release, so stick with 2.34.x until 2.36.0 is available. Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3

2016-08-18 Thread Khem Raj
> On Aug 18, 2016, at 4:33 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > On 18 August 2016 at 06:48, Wang Xin > wrote: > Upgrade gdk-pixbuf from 2.34.0 to 2.35.3. > > 2.35.x is a development release, so stick with 2.34.x until 2.36.0 is > available. perhaps recipe up

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3

2016-08-18 Thread Burton, Ross
On 18 August 2016 at 18:58, Khem Raj wrote: > perhaps recipe updater script should account for such presets ? > It does: http://recipes.yoctoproject.org/rrs/recipedetail/451/ says up-to-date as we have 2.34.0 despite there being 2.35.3. These upgrades have been done without reference to the to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3

2016-08-19 Thread Wang, Xin
There is no 2.36.x, so stick with 2.34.x. From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 1:58 AM To: Burton, Ross Cc: Wang, Xin/王 鑫; OE-core Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3 On Aug 18, 2016, at 4:33 AM, Burton, Ross mailto:ross.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3

2016-08-19 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 08/18/2016 09:11 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 18 August 2016 at 18:58, Khem Raj mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com>> wrote: perhaps recipe updater script should account for such presets ? It does: http://recipes.yoctoproject.org/rrs/recipedetail/451/ says up-to-date as we have 2.34.0 despite the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3

2016-08-19 Thread Khem Raj
> On Aug 19, 2016, at 5:41 AM, Alexander Kanavin > wrote: > > On 08/18/2016 09:11 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: >> >> On 18 August 2016 at 18:58, Khem Raj > > wrote: >> >>perhaps recipe updater script should account for such presets ? >> >> >> It does: http://recip

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3

2016-08-22 Thread Burton, Ross
On 19 August 2016 at 17:52, Khem Raj wrote: > good point, will this class give me some sort of parsing error, if I try > to update to odd version ? > No it simply sets the variables so that the recipe reporting service won't propose an upgrade to a development release. There may be a good reaso

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3

2016-08-22 Thread Khem Raj
On Aug 22, 2016 8:20 AM, "Burton, Ross" wrote: > > > On 19 August 2016 at 17:52, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> good point, will this class give me some sort of parsing error, if I try to update to odd version ? > > > No it simply sets the variables so that the recipe reporting service won't propose an up

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: 2.34.0 -> 2.35.3

2016-08-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 08/19/2016 07:52 PM, Khem Raj wrote: It does: http://recipes.yoctoproject.org/rrs/recipedetail/451/ says up-to-date as we have 2.34.0 despite there being 2.35.3. These upgrades have been done without reference to the tooling we've got. Also the recipe itself inherits upstream-version-i