The pre-processed output of conftest.c contains an include dir
and if the path of it contains a 'yes' it will cause some variables
to be wrongly set to yes because of the way it greps for it.
The fix is to use a more elaborated string instead of just 'yes'.
This has to be done at the configure and
On 02/23/2015 01:54 AM, Benjamin Esquivel wrote:
The pre-processed output of conftest.c contains an include dir
and if the path of it contains a 'yes' it will cause some variables
to be wrongly set to yes because of the way it greps for it.
The fix is to use a more elaborated string instead of ju
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 11:40 -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 02/23/2015 01:54 AM, Benjamin Esquivel wrote:
> > The pre-processed output of conftest.c contains an include dir
> > and if the path of it contains a 'yes' it will cause some variables
> > to be wrongly set to yes because of the way it greps
On 24 February 2015 at 22:17, Benjamin Esquivel <
benjamin.esqui...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > So the configure file does not get regenerated as part of the standard
> > auto-reconf?
> >
> No, if the fix is only applied at the configure.ac file the unwanted
> behavior still shows up from the conf
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 12:23 +, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 24 February 2015 at 22:17, Benjamin Esquivel
> wrote:
> > So the configure file does not get regenerated as part of
> the standard
> > auto-reconf?
> >
> No, if the fix is only applied at the con
On 25 February 2015 at 18:14, Benjamin Esquivel <
benjamin.esqui...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Saul, is there a specific part of the glibc's run.do_configure that
> should re-conf?
>
The glibc recipe explicitly avoids autoreconfig:
"# override this function to avoid the autoconf/automake/aclocal/
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Benjamin Esquivel
wrote:
> The pre-processed output of conftest.c contains an include dir
> and if the path of it contains a 'yes' it will cause some variables
> to be wrongly set to yes because of the way it greps for it.
> The fix is to use a more elaborated stri
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 25 February 2015 at 18:14, Benjamin Esquivel
> wrote:
>>
>> Saul, is there a specific part of the glibc's run.do_configure that
>> should re-conf?
>
>
> The glibc recipe explicitly avoids autoreconfig:
>
> "# override this function to av
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 08:18 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Benjamin Esquivel
> wrote:
> > The pre-processed output of conftest.c contains an include dir
> > and if the path of it contains a 'yes' it will cause some variables
> > to be wrongly set to yes because of the wa
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 08:17 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> >
> > On 25 February 2015 at 18:14, Benjamin Esquivel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Saul, is there a specific part of the glibc's run.do_configure that
> >> should re-conf?
> >
> >
> > The glibc rec
10 matches
Mail list logo
