On 6 June 2012 16:38, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Considering all future tarballs are going to be .xz, would it make
sense to default to .xz and fix the recipes where there isn't a .xz?
I think until we get a predominant number of the gnome packages updated
there is not much point
On 6 June 2012 06:34, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Upstream Gnome projects are starting to migrate to the .xz compress format,
so we need to add this to allow recipes to override the default of .bz2 as
the upstreams make the transition.
Considering all future tarballs are going to be
On 06/06/2012 03:46 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 6 June 2012 06:34, Saul Wolds...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Upstream Gnome projects are starting to migrate to the .xz compress format,
so we need to add this to allow recipes to override the default of .bz2 as
the upstreams make the transition.
Op 6 jun. 2012, om 17:38 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
On 06/06/2012 03:46 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 6 June 2012 06:34, Saul Wolds...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Upstream Gnome projects are starting to migrate to the .xz compress format,
so we need to add this to allow recipes to
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 19:51 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 6 jun. 2012, om 17:38 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
On 06/06/2012 03:46 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 6 June 2012 06:34, Saul Wolds...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Upstream Gnome projects are starting to migrate to the .xz
Upstream Gnome projects are starting to migrate to the .xz compress format,
so we need to add this to allow recipes to override the default of .bz2 as
the upstreams make the transition.
[YOCTO #2241]
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com
---
meta/classes/gnomebase.bbclass |3 ++-
1
